Self-Concept in Children with Learning Disabilities: The Relationship between Global Self-Concept,Academic “Discounting,” Nonacademic Self-Concept,and Perceived Social Support
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 1994
Self-Concept in Children with Learning Disabilities: The Relationship between Global Self-Concept,Academic “Discounting,” Nonacademic Self-Concept,and Perceived Social Support
The purpose of this study was to explore how some children with learning disabilities maintain a positive self-concept despite academic difficulties. The study used Harter's model to investigate the relationship between global self-concept and perceived competence in general intellectual ability, specific academic subjects, athletics, behavior and appearance, and perceived social support. Data were collected on 72 elementary-school students with learning disabilities. Five hypotheses were tested: (a) children would vary in their global and academic self-concept; (b) children with high global self-concept would discount the importance of academics; (c) children with high global self-concept would perceive themselves as more intelligent; (d) children with high global self-concept would perceive themselves as more competent in other, nonacademic domains; and (e) children with high global self-concept would perceive higher levels of social support. Data supported all hypotheses except discounting. Implications for interventions with students with learning disabilities are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattleJ. (1979). Self-esteem of students in regular and special classes. Psychological Reports, 44, 212–214.
2.
BearG.C.CleverA.ProctorW.A. (1991). Self-perceptions of nonhandicapped children and children with learning disabilities in integrated classes. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 409–426.
3.
BryanT.H. (1986). Personality and situational factors in learning disabilities. In PavlidisG.T.FisherD.D. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Its neuropsychology and treatment (pp. 215–230). Chichester, England: Wiley.
4.
ByrneB.M. (1984). The general/academic nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427–456.
5.
ByrneB.M.SchneiderB.H. (1988). Perceived competence scale for children: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across age and ability. Applied Measurements in Education, 1, 171–187.
6.
California State Department of Education. (1988). California special education programs: A composite of laws (10th ed.). Sacramento: California State Department of Education, Special Education Division.
ChapmanJ.W.BoersmaF.J. (1979). Learning disabilities, locus of control, and mother attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 250–258.
9.
CooleyE.J.AyresR.R. (1988). Self-concept and success-failure attributions of nonhandicapped students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 174–178.
10.
DeFrancescoJ.J.TaylorJ. (1985). Dimensions of self-concept in primary and middle school learning disabled and nondisabled students. Child Study Journal, 15, 99–105.
11.
DeVellisR. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 26). Newberry Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
12.
ForemanE.A. (1988). The effects of social support and school placement on the self-concept of LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 115–124.
13.
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the Social Support Scale for Children. Denver: University of Denver.
14.
HarterS.RenickM.J. (1988). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Learning Disabled Students. Denver: University of Denver.
15.
HeymanW. (1990). The self-perception of a learning disability and its relationship to academic self-concept and self-esteem. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 472–476.
16.
HogeR.D.McSheffreyR. (1991). An investigation of self-concept in gifted children. Exceptional Children, 238–245.
KistnerJ.HaskettM.WhiteK.RobbinsF. (1987). Perceived competence and self-worth of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 37–44.
19.
LincolnA.ChazanS. (1979). Perceived competence and intrinsic motivation in learning disability children. Journal of Clinical and Child Psychology, 213–216.
20.
MarshH.W.GouvernetP.J. (1989). Multidimensional self-concepts and perceptions of control: Construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 57–69.
21.
PearlR.DonahueM.BryanT. (1986). Social relationships of learning-disabled children. In TorgesenJ.WongB. (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 193–223). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22.
PoplinM. (1984). Summary rationalizations, apologies and farewell: What we don't know about the learning disabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 130–134.
23.
PrielB.LeshemT. (1990). Self-perceptions of first- and second-grade children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 637–642.
24.
RenickM.J.HarterS. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631–638.
25.
RogersH.SaklofskeD.H. (1985). Self-concepts, locus of control and performance expectations of LD children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 273–278.
26.
ShavelsonR.J.J.J.StantonG.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
27.
TesserA.CampbellJ. (1983). Self-definition and self-evaluation maintenance. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA.G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
TorgesenJ.K.DiceC. (1980). Characteristics of research on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 531–535.
29.
WinneP.H.MarxR.W. (1981). Convergent and discriminant validity in self-concept measurement. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
30.
WinneP.H.WoodlandsM.J.WongB.Y.L. (1982). Comparability of self-concept among learning disabled, normal, and gifted students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 470–475.
