AaronP. G.PhillipsS.LarsenS. (1988). Specific reading disability in historically famous persons. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 523–538.
2.
AdelmanH. S. (1989). Introduction to the special series on Gerald Coles' “The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities.””Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 266–308.
3.
AdelmanK. A.AdelmanH. S. (1987). Rodin, Patton, Edison, Wilson, Einstein: Were they really learning disabled?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 270–279.
4.
AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ. R. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The over-sophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242–246.
5.
AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ. E. (1987). In defense of different numbers. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 53–56.
6.
AmesL. B. (1968). A low intelligence quotient often not recognized as the chief cause of many learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 735–739.
7.
AppleM. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
BatemanB. (1992). Learning disabilities: The changing landscape. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 29–36.
9.
BarschR. H. (1992). Prospectives on learning disabilities: The vectors of a new convergence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 6–16.
10.
BelmontI.BelmontL. (1980). Is the slow learner in the classroom learning disabled?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 496–499.
11.
BiklenD.ZollersN. (1986). The focus of advocacy in the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 579–586.
12.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
14.
CarrierJ. G. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. New York: Greenwood Press.
15.
ColesG. S. (1982). Learning disabilities theories and Soviet psychology: A comparison of basic assumptions. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 269–283.
16.
ColesG. S. (1983). The use of Soviet psychological theory in understanding learning dysfunctions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 619–628.
17.
ColesG. S. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities.”New York: Fawcett Columbine.
18.
CruickshankW. M. (1977). Myths and realities in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 51–58.
19.
DoehringD. G. (1982). Learning disabilities and Soviet psychology: A comparison of straw men and red herrings. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 285–289.
20.
FinlanT. G. (1994). Learning disability: The imaginary disease. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
21.
FisherC. T.RizzoA. A. (1974). A paradigm for humanizing special education. The Journal of Special Education, 8, 321–329.
22.
FornessS. R. (1972). The mildly retarded as casualties of the educational system. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 117–125.
23.
FornessS. R. (1985). Effects of public policy at the state level: California's impact on MR, LD, and SED categories. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 36–43.
24.
FornessS. R.KavaleK. A. (1997). Defining emotional or behavioral disorders in school and related services. In LloydJ. W.KameenuiE. J.ChardD. (Eds.), Educating students with disabilities (pp. 45–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
GirouxH. A. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
26.
GoldbergE. (1982). Learning disabilities and Soviet psychology: Are there basic assumptions?Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 291–295.
27.
GottliebJ.AlterM.GottliebB. W.WishnerJ. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. Journal of Special Education, 27, 453–465.
28.
GruenbergE. M. (1964). Epidemiology. In StevensH. A.HeberR. (Eds.), Mental retardation (pp. 259–306). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
HallahanD. P.KellerC. E.BallD. W. (1986). A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 8–14.
30.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11, 139–149.
31.
HammillD. D. (1993). A brief look at the learning disabilities movement in the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 295–310.
32.
HeberR. (1970). Epidemiology of mental retardation. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
33.
HeshusiusL. (1982). At the heart of the advocacy dilemma: A mechanistic world view. Exceptional Children, 49, 6–13.
34.
HeshusiusL. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403–415.
35.
IanoR. P. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 50–61.
36.
IllichI. (1970). Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Interagency Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities—A report to the U. S. Congress. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
38.
KavaleK. A. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 12–20.
39.
KavaleK. A. (1995). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: The tortuous path of ideology. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 145–152.
40.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
41.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1997). Defining learning disabilities: Consonance and dissonance. In LloydJ. W.KameenuiE. J.ChardD. (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 3–25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
KavaleK. A.FuchsD.ScruggsT. E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement. Implications for policy making. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 70–77.
44.
KavaleK. A.ReeseJ. H. (1991). Teacher beliefs and perceptions about learning disabilities: A survey of Iowa practitioners. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 141–160.
45.
KlattH. J. (1991). Learning disabilities: A questionable construct. Educational Theory, 41, 47–60.
46.
LallyM. J.LloydR. D.KulbergJ. M. (1987). Is intelligence stable in learning-disabled children?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 411–416.
47.
LaneP. (1976). Let's deal from a straight deck. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 8–10.
48.
LarryP. V. Riles. (1984). 793 F. 2nd 969 (9th Circuit, 1984).
49.
LewinT. (1996, February 13). College toughens its stance on learning-disabilities aid: The learning disabled find a new skepticism on college aid programs. The New York Times, p. A1, A12.
50.
LopezM. F.FornessS. R.BocianK. M.MacMillanD. L.GreshamF. M. (1996). Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and emotional or behavior disorders in primary grades: Inappropriate placement in the learning disability category. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 286–299.
51.
LyonG. R. (1995). Critical research needs in learning disabilities: A programmatic response from the NICHD. Thalamus, 15, 10–11.
52.
MacMillanD. L.BorthwickS. (1980). The new EMR population: Can they be mainstreamed?Mental Retardation, 18, 155–158.
53.
MacMillanD. L.GreshamF. M.SipersteinG. N. (1993). Conceptual and psychometric concerns about the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 325–335.
54.
MacMillanD. L.MeyersC. E. (1980). Larry P.: An educational interpretation. School of Psychology Review, 9, 136–148.
55.
MacMillanD. L.SipersteinG. M.GreshamF. M. (1996). A challenge to the viability of mild mental retardation as a diagnostic category. Exceptional Children, 62, 356–371.
56.
MannL. (1979). On the trail of process. New York: Grune & Stratton.
57.
MatherN.HealeyW. C. (1990). Deposing aptitude-achievement discrepancy as the imperial criterion for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 40–48.
58.
McKnightR. T. (1982). The learning disability myth in American education. Journal of Education, 164, 351–359.
59.
MeierJ. H. (1971). Prevalence and characteristics of learning disabilities found in second grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 1–16.
60.
MercerC. D.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.MercerA. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217–232.
61.
MillerJ. L. (1990). Apocalypse or renaissance or something in between? Toward a realistic appraisal of The Learning Mystique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 86–91.
62.
MinerM.SiegelL. S. (1992). William Butler Yeats: Dyslexic?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 372–375.
63.
MinskoffJ. G. (1973). Differential approaches to prevalence estimates of learning disabilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 205, 139–145.
64.
MoatsL. C.LyonG. R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282–294.
65.
MyklebustH. R.BoshesB. (1960). Psychoneurological learning disorders in children. Archives of Pediatrics, 77, 247–256.
66.
NicholsP. L.ChenT. C. (1981). Minimal brain dysfunction. A prospective study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
NormanC. A.ZigmondN. (1980). Characteristics of children labeled and served as learning disabled in school systems affiliated with Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 542–547.
68.
PollowayE. A.SmithJ. D. (1988). Current status of the mild mental retardation construct. Identification, placement, and programs. In WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C.WalbergJ. (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. II, pp. 1–22). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
69.
PoplinM. S. (1988a). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
70.
PoplinM. S. (1988b). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implication for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
71.
PoplinM. S. (1995). Looking through other lenses and listening to other voices: Stretching the boundaries of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 392–398.
72.
PopperK. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
73.
PopperK. R. (1968). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Harper.
74.
SarupM. (1978). Marxism and education: A study of phenomenological and Marxist approaches to education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
75.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1988). Legitimizing the field of learning disabilities: Does research orientation matter?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 219–222.
76.
SenfG. M. (1987). Learning disabilities as sociologic sponge: Wiping up life's spills. In VaughnS.BosC. (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions (pp. 87–101). Boston: Little, Brown/College-Hill.
77.
SharpR. (1980). Knowledge, ideology, and the politics of schooling: Towards a Marxist analysis of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
78.
ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M.EscobarM. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1008.
79.
ShepardL. A.SmithM. L.VojirC. P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309–331.
80.
SigmonS. B. (1987). Radical analysis of special education: Focus on historical development and learning disabilities. London: The Falmer Press.
81.
SkrticT. M. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver: Love.
82.
SleeterC. E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–54.
83.
SmithM. D.ColemanJ. M.DokeckiP. R.DavisE. E. (1977). Intellectual characteristics of school labeled learning disabled children. Exceptional Children, 43, 352–357.
84.
StraussA. A.LehtinenL. E. (1947). Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. New York: Grune & Stratton.
85.
SwansonH. L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196–209.
86.
ThompsonL. J. (1971). Language disabilities in men of eminence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 39–50.
87.
ThorndikeR. L. (1963). The concepts of over- and under-achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
88.
TorgesenJ. K. (1977). The role of non-specific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 27–35.
89.
WalzerS.RichmondJ. (1973). The epidemiology of learning disorders. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 20, 549–565.
90.
WarnerM. M. (1993). Objectivity and emancipation in learning disabilities: Holism from the perspective of critical realism. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 311–325.
91.
WiederholtJ. L. (1974). Historical perspectives on the education of the learning disabled. In MannL.SabatinoD. (Eds.), The second review of special education (pp. 103–152). Philadelphia, PA: JSE Press.
92.
WiederholtJ. L. (1975). Learning disabilities versus reading disabilities (Symposium No. 11). The Journal of Special Education, 9, 117–118.
93.
WozniakR. H. (1975). Psychology and education of the learning disabled child in the Soviet Union. In CruickshankW. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Perceptual and learning disabilities in children. Vol 1: Psychoeducational practices (pp. 407–479). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
94.
YoungM. F. D. (Ed.). (1971). Knowledge and control. New directions for the sociology of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
95.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB.ShinnM. R.McGueM. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.