This article reports on the ways in which one teacher led her special education students' cognitive development in their “zones of proximal development,” with a specific focus on her interactions with one preconventional writer. Our examination showed that she advanced the student's performance by involving him in literacy activities in advance of competence, using meaningful text representations to scaffold performance, modeling and apprenticing him in the social dialogue, and assisting his performance through social interactions with peers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplebeeA.N.LangerJ.A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60 (2), 168–175.
2.
CazdenC. (1981). Social context of learning to read. In GuthrieJ.T. (Eds.), Comprehension and teaching: Research view (pp. 118–139). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3.
DiazR.M.NealC.J.Amaya-WilliamsM. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In MollL.C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 127–154). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
EllisE.S.LenzB.K.SabornieE.J. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2, Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (2), 6–23.
5.
EnglertC.S.GarmonA.MariageT.V.RozendalM.TarrantK.L.UrbaJ. (1993). Beyond skills instruction: The effects of discourse communities in special education classrooms on literacy performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
6.
EnglertC.S.PalincsarA.S. (1991). Reconsidering instructional research in literacy from a sociocultural perspective. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 225–229.
7.
EnglertC.S.RaphaelT.E.MariageT.V. (1994). Developing a school-based discourse for literacy learning: A principled search for understanding. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17 (1), 2–32.
8.
EnglertC.S.RaphaelT.E.AndersonL.M.GreggS.L.AnthonyH.M. (1989). Exposition: Reading, writing, and the metacognitive knowledge of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research, 5 (1), 5–24.
9.
GallimoreR.TharpR.RuedaR. (1989). The social context of cognitive functioning in the lives of mildly handicapped persons. In SugdenD. (Ed.), Cognitive approaches in special education (pp. 51–81). London: Falmer Press.
10.
JacobsS.E. (1990). Scaffolding children's consciousness as thinkers. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12 (2), 70–75.
11.
KlenkL.WilsonA. (1992, December). Redesigning the context for literacy learning in a primary special education classroom: Examining activity from an emergent literacy perspective. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
12.
NewmanD.GriffinP.ColeM. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schoolCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
NodineB.F.BarenbaumE.NewcomerP. (1985). Story composition by learning disabled, reading disabled, and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 167–179.
14.
PalinscarA.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1&2), 73–98.
15.
PalinscarA.S.BrownA.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In BrophyJ.E. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 35–69). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16.
PalinscarA.S.EnglertC.S.RaphaelT.E.GavelekJ. (1989). Transforming the learning disabled into self-regulated learners: The construction, implementation, and validation of a sustainable early literacy curriculum (Grant No. H023C90076). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
17.
PalinscarA.S.KlenkL. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (4), 211–225.
18.
PalinscarA.S.StevensD.D.GavelekJ.R. (1988). Collaborating with teachers in the interest of student collaboration. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 41–53.
19.
PoplinM.S. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
20.
ReidD.K.StoneC.A. (1991). Why is cognitive instruction effective? Underlying learning mechanisms. Remedial and Special Education, 12 (3), 8–19.
21.
RosenshineB.MeisterC. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 26–33.
22.
SeidenbergP.L. (1989). Relating text-processing research to reading and writing instruction for learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5 (1), 4–12.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In MollL.C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 11–126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
WertschJ.V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
