We reviewed 27 published studies on spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities (LD) and coded them for the following variables: (a) student characteristics, (b) instructional activities, (c) nature of materials to be learned, and (d) criterial tasks (Jenkins, 1979). Most of the studies investigated the impact of instructional activities on the production of targeted spelling items by elementary-grade students with LD. We interpret the results of this review as suggesting that the following activities may enhance learning for some students with LD: (a) limiting the number of new words introduced each day, (b) facilitating student-directed and peer-assisted instruction, (c) directing students to name letters aloud as they are practiced, (d) including instruction in morphemic analysis, (e) providing immediate error imitation and correction, (f) using motivating reinforcers, and (g) providing periodic retesting and review. Only limited information is available on interventions that promote generalization of spelling knowledge to untrained words, use of trained vocabulary in a variety of writing activities, and maintenance of vocabulary across time. We discuss current research issues and future research directions in spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlemanC.McLaughlinT.F.BialozorR.C. (1990). Comparison of auditory/visual and visual/motor practice on the spelling accuracy of learning disabled children. Reading Improvement, 27, 261–268.
2.
AllredR.A. (1987). Spelling trends, content, and methods. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
3.
BeckS.MatsonJ.L.KazdinA.E. (1983). An instructional package to enhance spelling performance in emotionally disturbed children. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 4(2/3), 69–77.
4.
BendellD.TollefsonN.FineM. (1980). Interaction of locus-of-control orientation and the performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 32–35.
5.
BlauH.B.LovelessE.J. (1982). Specific hemispheric-routing-TAK/v to teach spelling to dyslexics: VAK and VAKT challenged. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 461–466.
6.
BradleyL. (1981). The organization of motor patterns for spelling: An effective remedial strategy for backward readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 83–91.
7.
BrownM. (1988). An investigation of a spelling intervention with learning disabled elementary school students. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 12 (1), 1–18.
8.
BryantN.D.DrabinI.R.GettingerM. (1981). Effects of varying unit size on spelling achievement in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 200–203.
9.
CarlisleJ.F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.
10.
CaseR.BereiterC. (1984). From behaviorism to cognitive behaviorism to cognitive development: Steps in the evolution of instructional design. Instructional Science, 13, 141–158.
11.
ChristensonS.L.ThurlowM.L.YsseldykeJ.E.McVicarR. (1989). Written language instruction for students with mild handicaps: Is there enough quantity to ensure quality?Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 219–229.
12.
DaltonB.WinburyN.E.MoroccoC.C. (1990). “If you could just push a button”: Two fourth grade boys with learning disabilities learn to use a computer spelling checker. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 177–191.
13.
DangelH.L. (1989). The use of student directed spelling strategies. Academic Therapy, 25 (1), 43–51.
14.
DarchC.SimpsonR.G. (1990). Effectiveness of visual imagery versus rule-based strategies in teaching spelling to learning disabled students. Research in Rural Education, 7 (1), 61–70.
15.
DelquadriJ.C.GreenwoodC.R.StrettonK.HallR.V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225–239.
16.
DenoS.L. (1990). Individual differences and individual difference: The essential difference in special education. Journal of Special Education, 24, 160–173.
17.
DenoS.L.MirkinP.K.LowryL.KuehnleK. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
18.
DeshlerD.D.FerrellW.R.KassC.E. (1978). Error monitoring of schoolwork by learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11 (7), 10–23.
19.
DixonR.C. (1991). The application of sameness analysis to spelling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 285–291.
20.
FosterK.TorgesenJ.K. (1983). The effects of directed study on the spelling performance of two subgroups of learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 252–257.
21.
FrankA.R.WackerD.P.KeithT.Z.SagenT.K. (1987). Effectiveness of a spelling study package for learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 110–118.
22.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD.HamlettC.L.AllinderR.M. (1991). The contribution of skills analysis to curriculum-based measurement in spelling. Exceptional Children, 57, 443–542.
23.
GerberM.M. (1985). Spelling as concept-governed problem solving: Learning disabled and normally achieving students. In HutsonB. (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research (Vol. 3, pp. 39–75). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
GerberM.M. (1986). Generalization of spelling strategies by learning disabled students as a result of contingent imitation, modeling, and mastery criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 530–537.
25.
GerberM.M.HallR.J. (1987). Information processing approaches to studying spelling deficiencies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 34–42.
26.
GettingerM.BryantN.D.FayneH.R. (1982). Designing spelling instruction for LD children: An emphasis on unit size, distributed practice and training for transfer. Journal of Special Education, 16, 439–448.
27.
GrahamS. (1987). Spelling disabilities. In ReynoldsC.MannL. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education (Vol. 3, pp. 1490–1491). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
GrahamS.FreemanS. (1985). Strategy training and teacher- vs. student-controlled study conditions: Effects on LD students' spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 267–274.
29.
GrahamS.MillerL. (1979). Spelling research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 12 (2), 1–16.
30.
GreeneH.A. (1954). The New Iowa Spelling Scale. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
31.
HammillD.LarsenS. (1978). Test of Written Language (rev. ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32.
HasselbringT.S. (1984). Using a microcomputer for imitating student errors to improve spelling performance. Computers, Reading and Language Art, 1 (4), 12–14.
33.
HoffmanF.J.SheldonK.L.MinskoffE.H.SnutterS.W.SeidleE.F.BakerD.P.BaileyM.B.EcholsL.D. C. (1987). Needs of learning disabled adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 43–52.
34.
JastakJ.E.JastakS.R. (1965). Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates.
35.
JenkinsJ.J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In CermakL.S.CraikF.I. M. (Eds.), Levels and processing in human memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
KauffmanJ.M.HallahanD.P.HaasK.BrameT.BorenR. (1978). Imitating children's errors to improve their spelling performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 33–38.
37.
KershnerJ.R. (1990). Self-concept and IQ as predictors of remedial success in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 368–374.
38.
KerchnerL.B.KistingerB.J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers, and LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
39.
LarsenS.HammillD. (1976). Test of Written Spelling. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
40.
LessenE.DudzinskiM.KarshK.Van AckerR. (1989). A survey of ten years of academic intervention research with learning disabled students: Implications for research and practice. Learning Disability Focus, 4, 106–122.
41.
McDermottP.A.WatkinsM.W. (1983). Computerized versus conventional instruction for learning disabled pupils. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 81–88.
42.
McGuiganC.A. (1975). The add-a-word spelling program (Working Paper No. 53). Seattle: University of Washington.
43.
MooreV.CalliasM. (1987). A systematic approach to teaching reading and spelling to a nine-year-old boy with severely impaired literacy skills. Educational Psychology, 7, 103–115.
44.
MurphyJ.F.HernC.L.WilliamsR.L.McLaughlinT.F. (1990). The effects of the copy, cover, compare approach in increasing spelling accuracy in learning disabled students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 378–386.
45.
NulmanJ.H.GerberM.M. (1984). Improving spelling performance by imitating a child's errors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 328–334.
46.
OllendickT.H.MatsonJ.L.Esveldt-DawsonK.ShapiroE.S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievement: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645–654.
47.
Pratt-StruthersJ.StruthersT.B.WilliamsR.L. (1983). The effects of the Add-A-Word spelling program on spelling accuracy during creative writing. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 277–283.
48.
ReadC.HodgesR.E. (1982). Spelling. In MitzelH.E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 1758–1767). New York: Free Press.
49.
RobinsonJ.W.HesseK.D. (1981). A morphemically based spelling program's effect on spelling skills and spelling performance of seventh grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 75 (1), 56–62.
50.
SalviaJ.HughesC. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught. New York: Macmillan.
51.
StevensK.B.SchusterJ.W. (1987). Effects of a constant time delay procedure on the written spelling performance of a learning disabled student. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 9–16.
52.
SummersE.G. (1986). The information flood in learning disabilities: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 49–60.
53.
Traynellis-YurekE. (1988). Providing an oral fluent model for spelling and reading success. Reading Improvement, 25, 105–109.
54.
VallecorsaA.L.ZigmondN.HendersonL.M. (1985). Spelling instruction in special education classrooms: A survey of practices. Exceptional Children, 52, 19–24.
55.
VaughnS.SchummJ.S.GordonJ.(in press-a). Early spelling acquisition: Does writing beat the computer?Learning Disability Quarterly.
56.
VaughnS.SchummJ.S.GordonJ.(in press-b). Which motoric condition is most effective for teaching spelling to students with and without learning disabilities?Journal of Learning Disabilities.
57.
VernonM.ColeyJ.D.DuBoisJ.H. (1980). Using sign language to remediate severe reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 46–51.
58.
WinterlingV. (1990). The effects of constant time delay, practice in writing or spelling, and reinforcement on sight word recognition in a small group. Journal of Special Education, 24, 101–116.
