Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using two modes of production, writing and dictation, this study compared the story production, coherence, and fluency of learning disabled (LD) children with that of normal-achieving and low-achieving subjects across three grade levels. Results indicated that: (a) mode of production had no effect upon story production or fluency for any of the subjects; (b) all children made more errors in coherence using dictation; (c) LD children produced fewer stories, were less fluent than the other subjects regardless of mode, and did not improve greatly with maturation; (d) third-grade children of all ability levels produced few stories; (e) there were few differences between the performance of the fifth- and seventh-grade students on all variables; and (6) story producers were more fluent than producers of other types of compositions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barenbaum

E.M.

Newcomer

P.L.

Nodine

B.F.

(1987). Children's ability to write stories as a function of variation in task, age, and developmental level. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 175–188.

Britton

J.F.

(1970). Language and learning. Hamonds-worth, England: Penguin Books.

Bryson

Siegel

(1986 June,). The development of written language production in normally achieving and learning-disabled children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto.

Deno

S.L.

Marston

Mirkin

(1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.

Garnham

Oakhill

Johnson-Laird

P.N.

(1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29–46.

Graham

(1982). Composition research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 14, 1–16.

Hindi

Hildyard

(1983). The comparison of oral and written productions of two discourse types. Discourse Processes, 6, 91–105.

Johnson-Laird

P.N.

(1983). The coherence of discourse. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Liles

B.Z.

(1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123–133.

10.

MacArthur

C.A.

Graham

(1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 22–43.

11.

Mandler

J.M.

(1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

12.

Nodine

B.F.

Barenbaum

E.M.

Newcomer

P.L.

(1985). Story composition by learning disabled, reading disabled, and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 167–179.

13.

Pappas

C.C.

(1981). The development of narrative capabilities within a synergistic, variable perspective of language development: An examination of cohesion harmony of stories produced in three contexts —retelling, dictating and writing. DAI, 42, 584-A.

14.

Poteet

J.A.

(1979). Characteristics of written expression of learning disabled and non-learning disabled elementary school students. Diagnostique, 4, 60–74.

15.

Rentel

King

(1983). Present at the beginning. In Mosenthal

Tamor

Walmsley

(Eds.), Research on writing principles and methods (pp. 139–176). New York: Longman.)

16.

Scardamalia

Bereiter

Goelman

(1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In Nystrand

(Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 173–210). New York: Academic Press.)

17.

Stein

N.L.

Glenn

C.G.

(1982). Children's concept of time: The development of a story schema. In Friedman

(Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 255–282). New York: Academic Press.)

18.

Stein

N.L.

Policastro

(1984). The concept of a story: A comparison between children's and teachers' viewpoints. In Mandl

Stein

N.L.

Trabasso

(Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.)

19.

Stein

N.L.

Trabasso

(1982). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In Glaser

(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.)

Comparison of the Story Production of LD,Normal-Achieving,and Low-Achieving Children under Two Modes of Production

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References