The results of this study suggest that the syntactic complexity of written mathematical problems influences the student's ability to solve the problems. Although the study used low-achieving eighth-grade students and a relatively small n, the implications for assessment and instructional planning for LD students are nevertheless apparent. The study stresses the importance of considering factors other than just a youngster's mathematical ability to explain below-average performance in arithmetic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikerL.R.Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 359–385.
2.
BalowI.H.Reading and computation ability as determinants of problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher, 1964, 11, 18–22.
3.
ChonR.Arithmetic and learning disabilities. In MyklebustH.R. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities, Vol. II. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1971, 332–389.
4.
DaleE.ChallJ.A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 1948, 27, 11–20.
5.
GronlundN.E.Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan, 1976.
6.
LinvilleW.J.The effects of syntax and vocabulary upon the difficulty of verbal arithmetic with fourth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Indianapolis, 1969.
7.
LobanW.D.The language of elementary school children. NCTE Research Report, No. 1. Champaign, IL: NCTE, 1963.
8.
LoftusE.SuppesP.Structural variables that determine problem-solving difficulty in computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 531–542.
9.
MillerJ.W.HintzmanC.A.Syntactic complexity of Newberry award winning books. The Reading Teacher, 1975, 28, 750–756.
10.
ReidJ.Sentence structure in reading. Research in Education, 1970, 16, 23–27.
11.
RuddellR.B.The effect of oral and written patterns of language structure on reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 1965, 18, 270–275.
12.
SearleB.W.Structural variables affecting computer assisted performance on arithmetic word problems of disadvantaged and deaf students. Report No. TR-213. Los Angeles, CA: Stanford University, California Institute for Mathematical Studies in Social Science, 1973 (ERIC-084-158).
13.
SemelE.M.WiigE.H.Comprehension of syntactic structures and critical verbal elements by children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 53–58.
14.
StricklandR.The language of elementary school children: Its relationship to the language of reading textbooks and the quality of reading of selected children. Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University, 1962, 38, No. 4.
15.
SuppesP.LoftusE.JermanM.Problem solving on a computer based teletype. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1969, 2, 1–15.
16.
VeldmanD.Fortran programming for the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1967.
