The performance instability of learning disabled (LD) and emotionally handicapped (EH) children was compared in two studies. In the first study, 50 LD and 37 EH children were measured on three third-grade reading passages in two ways: (a) they were administered a different reading passage once a week for three consecutive weeks; and (b) they were measured on all three passages in one sitting. In the second study, a subsample of 43 students (24 LD, 19 EH) were measured on instructional level reading passages 28 to 47 times within 18 school weeks. Analyses of covariance were run on a stability index calculated on numbers of (a) words read correctly during each administration of the third-grade reading passages and (b) correct words and errors for the instructional level reading passages. Results indicated no difference between the performance instability of the two groups of subjects. Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of LD and other exceptional students are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AviezerY.SimpsonS. (1980). Variability and instability in perceptual and reading functions of brain-injured children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 41–47.
2.
BorgW.R.GallM.D. (1979). Educational research. New York: Longman.
3.
ClementsS.D. (1966). Minimal brain dysfunction in children: Terminology and identification (NINDS Monograph No. 3, U.S. Public Health Service Publication No. 1415). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
DigateG.EpsteinM.H.CullinanD.SwitzkyH.N. (1978). Modification of impulsivity: Implications for improved efficiency in learning for exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 12, 459–467.
6.
Diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM III). (1980). New York: American Psychiatric Association.
7.
Dudley-MarlingC.C.KaufmanN.J.TarverS.G. (1981). WISC and WISC-R profiles of learning disabled children: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 307–319.
8.
EbersoleM.KephartN.C.EbersoleJ.B. (1968). Steps to achievement for the slow learner. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
9.
FuchsL.S. (1981). The concurrent validity of progress measures of basal reading material. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
10.
FuchsL.S.DenoS.L.MarstonD. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic achievement for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8 (3), 135–149.
11.
FuchsL.S.DenoS.L.MirkinP.K. (1982). The effect of continuous evaluation of student goals on reading achievement (Research Report No. 96). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 045)
12.
FuchsL.S.DenoS.L.MirkinP.K.(in press). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal.
13.
FuchsD.FuchsL.S. (1983). Teacher perceptions of performance instability in handicapped children. Unpublished raw data.
14.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD.DenoS.L. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 6–26.
15.
GuilfordJ.P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
HallahanD.P.KauffmanJ.M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and MR reconsidered. Journal of Special Education, 11, 139–149.
17.
KneedlerR.D.HallahanD.P. (Eds.). (1983). Research in learning disabilities: Summaries of the Institutes. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4.)
18.
KrupskiA. (1981). An interactional approach to the study of attention problems in children with learning handicaps. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 1–11.
19.
McKinneyJ.D. (1983). Contributions of the Institutes for Research on Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 129–144.
20.
MirkinP.K.DenoS.L.FuchsL.S.WessonC.TindalG.MarstonD.KuehnleK. (1981). Procedures to develop and monitor progress on IEP goals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
21.
New York State Education Department. (1982, March, 26). Subchapter P: Part 200—Handicapped Children. Regulations of the Commissioner of Education.
22.
NitkoA.J. (1983). Educational tests and measurement: An introduction. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
O'DonnellL.F. (1980). Intra-individual discrepancy in diagnosing specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 10–18.
24.
SmithC.R. (1983). Learning disabilities: The interaction of learner, task, and setting. Boston: Little Brown.
25.
StevensG.D.BirchJ.W. (1957). A proposal for clarification of the terminology used to describe brain-injured children. Exceptional Children, 23, 346–349.
26.
StraussA.LehtinenL. (1947). Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. New York: Grune & Stratton.
27.
SwansonH.L. (1982). In the beginning was a strategy: Or was it a constraint?Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, x-xiv.
28.
U.S. Government. (1976). Education of handicapped children. Federal Register, 41, 52105–52107.
