Twenty-four empirical investigations of tutoring interventions were evaluated. Although all authors favored their use, equivocal results were reported. Particularly weak were substantiated reports of social benefits to tutors or tutees. Methodological problems associated with such research in field settings are discussed, and implications for future research are given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenV.L. (1976a). Children as teachers. New York: Academic Press.
2.
AllenV.L. (1976b). The helping relationship and socialization of children: Some perspectives on tutoring. In AllenV.L. (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 9–25). New York: Academic Press.)
3.
ArgyleM. (1976). Social skills theory. In AllenV.L. (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 57–71). New York: Academic Press.)
4.
BalmerJ. (1972). Project tutor - Look, I can do something good.!Teaching Exceptional Children, 4, 166–175.
5.
BryanT.H.BryanJ.H. (1981). Some personal and social experiences of learning disabled children. In KeoghB. (Ed.), Advances in special education (Vol. 3) (pp. 147–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.)
6.
ChristoplosF. (1974). Keeping exceptional children in regular classes.!Exceptional Children, 39, 569–572.
7.
CsapoM. (1976). If you don't know it, teach it!Clearinghouse, 12, 365–367.
8.
DequinH.C.SmithJ. (1980). Learning disabled students can be tutors in library media skills.!Top of the News, 36, 352–356.
9.
Devin-SheehanL.FeldmanR.S.AllenV.L. (1976). Research on children tutoring children: A critical review. Review of Education of Research, 46, 355–385.
10.
EpsteinL. (1978). The effects of intraclass peer tutoring on the vocabulary development of learning disabled children.!Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 63–66.
11.
FeldmanR.S.Devin-SheehanL.AllenV.L. (1976). Children tutoring children: A critical review of research. In AllenV.L. (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 235–249). New York: Academic Press.)
12.
GerberM.KauffmannJ. (1981). Peer tutoring in academic settings. In StrainP. (Ed.), Utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents (pp. 155–187). New York: Plenum Press.)
13.
HaisleyF.B.TellC.A.AndrewsJ.A. (1981). Peers as tutors in the mainstream: Trained “teachers” of handicapped adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 224–226.
14.
HarrisJ.AldridgeJ. (1983). 3 for me is better than 2 for you.!Academic Therapy, 18, 361–365.
15.
HarrisonG.V. (1976). Structured tutoring: Antidote for low achievement. In AllenV.L. (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 169–176). New York: Academic Press.)
16.
HassingerJ.ViaM. (1969). How much does a tutor learn through teaching reading?Journal of Secondary Education, 44, 42–44.
17.
HigginsT.S. (1982). A comparison of two methods of practice on the spelling performance of learning disabled adolescents.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(8-B), 4021.
18.
JenkinsJ.R.MayhallU.R.PeschkaC.M.JenkinsL.M. (1974). Comparing small group and tutorial instruction in resource rooms.!Exceptional Children, 40, 245–250.
19.
JonesC.P. (1981). A descriptive study of cross-age peer tutoring as a strategy for reading improvement in two selected middle schools of the Highland Park, Michigan School System from 1970 to 1978. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47.
20.
KaneB.J.AlleyG.R. (1980). A peer-tutored, instructional management program in computational mathematics for incarcerated, learning disabled juvenile delinquents.!Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 39–42.
21.
KingR.T. (1982). Learning from a PAL.!The Reading Teacher, 35 (6), 682–685.
22.
LamportK.C. (1982). The effect of inverse tutoring on reading disabled students in a public school setting.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(03-A), 729.
23.
LandrumJ.W. (1970). When students teach others.!Educational Leadership, 27, 446–448.
24.
LaneP.PollackC.SherN. (1972). Remotivation of disruptive adolescents.!Journal of Reading, 15, 351–354.
25.
MandoliM.MandoliP.McLaughlinT.F. (1982). Effects of same-age peer tutoring on the spelling performance of a mainstreamed elementary LD student.!Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 85–189.
26.
McCrackenS.J. (1979). The effect of a peer tutoring program utilizing data-based instruction on the word recognition and reading comprehension skills of secondary age level handicapped students.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 40(08-A), 4516.
27.
McWhorterK.T.LevyJ. (1971). The influence of a tutorial program upon tutors.!Journal of Reading, 14, 221–224.
28.
MellbergD.B. (1981). The effect of the handicapped and nonhandicapped tutor on the academic achievement of the economically disadvantaged adolescent tutor and the elementary age tutee.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(02-A), 659.
29.
SinghR.K. (1982). Peer tutoring: Its effects on the math skills of students designated as learning disabled. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4793-A.
30.
StrainP. (Ed.). (1981). Utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents. New York: Plenum Press.)
31.
StrodtbeckF.L.RonchiD.HansellS. (1976). Tutoring and psychological growth. In AllenV.L. (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 199–218). New York: Academic Press.)
32.
SwensonS.H. (1975). Effects of peer tutoring in regular elementary classrooms on sociometric status, self-concept and arithmetic achievement of slow learning tutors and learners in a special education resource program.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(09-A), 6003.
33.
WattsW.J.CushionM.B. (1982). Enhancing self-concept of LD adolescents: One approach.!Academic Therapy, 18, 95–101.
34.
WeinerA.GoldmanR.LevR.ToledanoU.RosnerE. (1974). Applying the helper-therapy principle: A children-teacher-children project.!Child Welfare, 53, 445–451.
35.
WillisJ.W.MorrisB.CrowderJ. (1972). A remedial reading technique for disabled readers that employs students as behavioral engineers.!Psychology in the Schools, 9, 67–70.
36.
WingertD.A. (1981). The use of high school paraprofessional tutors with programmed tutorial materials to instruct elementary learners with handicaps.!Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4364-A.
