Abstract
Most definitions of reading disability and/or dyslexia involve assessment of a discrepancy between reading ability and measured intelligence. In this article, it is argued that the use of intelligence as an aptitude benchmark in defining dyslexia conceals unsupported assumptions about educational potential and makes it difficult to differentiate the cognitive characteristics of dyslexic children from those of other poor readers. The use of a more educationally relevant aptitude measure such as listening comprehension is suggested. However, it is argued that all discrepancy definitions predicated on mismatches between aptitude and achievement are threatened by findings that acquisition of literacy fosters the cognitive skills assessed on aptitude measures. These findings undermine the logic of discrepancy measurement by weakening the distinction between aptitude and achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
