This study investigated the generalizability of LD children's working memory deficits to naturalistic tasks. Tasks included questionnaire items about recall strategies and the recall of everyday features, early school information, consequential events, and misleading information; the working memory measure was Daneman and Carpenter's (1980) sentence span test. Results indicate that LD children are deficient on working memory and naturalistic measures, but their naturalistic memory deficits do not appear to relate to consequential or suggestible recall tasks. Weak intercorrelations were found between the memory measures, suggesting that working and naturalistic memory reflects independent memory systems. It was concluded that disabled children's deficient memory performance in a natural context is somewhat independent of working memory problems, except when the naturalistic measures (i.e., questionnaire items) assess intentional recall. Deficits in naturalistic memory were less apparent for salient and contextually meaningful information
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
2.
BanajiM. R.CrowderR. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1165–1193.
CeciS. J.RossD. F.TogliaM.P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 16, 38–49.
5.
CooneyJ. B.SwansonH. L. (1987). Memory and learning disabilities: An overview. In SwansonH. L. (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities (pp. 1–40). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
CrovitzH. F.CordoniC. N.DanielW.PerlmanJ. (1984). Everyday forgetting experiences: Real-time investigations with implications for the study of memory management in brain-damaged patients. Cortex, 20, 349–359.
7.
DallegoM.MoeleyB. (1980). Free recall in boys of normal and poor reading levels as a function of task manipulations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 62–78.
8.
DanemanM. (1987). Reading and working memory. In BeechJ. R.ColleyA. M. (Eds), Cognitive approaches to reading (pp. 57–86). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
DanemanM.CarpenterP.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
10.
DanemanM.BlennerhassettA. (1984). How to assess the listening comprehension of prereaders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1372–1381.
11.
EllisH. D.ThomasR. L.RodriquizI. A. (1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 432–470.
12.
Federal Register (1977). 42(250).
13.
FletcherJ. M. (1985). Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups. Analyses by selective reminding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 244–259.
14.
HerrmannD. J. (1982). Know thy memory: The use of questionnaires to assess and study memory. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 434–452.
15.
JormA. F.ShareD. L.MacLeanR.MatthewsR. (1986). Cognitive factors at school entry predictive of specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 27, 45–54.
16.
LoftusT. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
MassonM. E. J.MillerJ. A. (1983). Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 314–318.
18.
NeisserU. (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
19.
NickersonR. S.AdamsM. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 287–307.
20.
PaivioA.YuilleJ.MadiganS. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph Supplement, 76 (1), Part 2.
21.
SchmidtS. R.BohanonJ. N. (1988). In defense of flashbulb memory hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 332–335.
22.
ScruggsT.MastropieriM. (1989). Mnemonic instruction in LD students: A field based evaluation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 119–125.
23.
StanovichK. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading I: Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485–493.
24.
SunderlandA.HarrisJ. E.BaddeleyA. D. (1983). Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 341–357.
25.
SunderlandA.WattsK.BaddeleyA.HarrisJ. (1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 376–384.
26.
SwansonH. L. (1986). Do semantic memory deficiencies underlie disabled readers' encoding processes?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 461–488.
27.
SwansonH. L. (1987). Verbal coding deficits in the recall of pictorial information in learning disabled readers: The influence of a lexical system. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 143–170.
28.
SwansonH. L.CochranK. F.EwersC. A. (1989). Working memory in skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 145–156.
29.
TarverS.HallahanD.KaufmanJ.BallD. (1976). Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A development lag. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 375–385.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M. (1987). Linguistic coding and reading ability. In RosenbergS. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 69–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
ZaragozaM. S.KoshmiderJ. W. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 246–255.
