Detecting Predictive Bias: The WISC-R vs. Achievement Scores of Mexican-American and Non-Minority Students

Abstract

This study takes issue with the conventional application of regression analysis to the problem of detecting predictive bias of IQ tests toward minorities. Jensen (1968, 1980) and Reynolds (1982) rejected the hypothesis that IQ tests are unfair. However, the statistical techniques employed by these and other researchers in the analysis of this problem are of questionable sensitivity to predictive bias. In the present study, the predictive relationship between the WISC-R and PIAT and WRAT achievement scores of 125 Mexican-American and 125 non-minority students was analyzed using four separate methods of analysis. Conventional methods were found to be insensitive to and inappropriate for the detection of predictive bias. An alternative means of detecting predictive bias is proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bossard

Reynolds

Gutkin

T.B.

A regression analysis of test bias on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale . Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1980, 19, 52–54.

Cleary

R.A.

Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 115–124.

Cleary

R.A.

Humphreys

L.C.

Hendrick

S.A.

Wesman

Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 15–41.

Gordon

A. A.

A study of the applicability of the same minimum qualifying scores for technical schools to white males USAF and negro males. Lackland Air Force Base, TX: USAF Technical Report, 1953, 53–54.

Hook

The relationship of cognitive, affective, demographic and school-related variables to membership of community college students in 4 ethnic groups and their academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 36, 7294. (University Microfilms No. 11-A)

Jensen

A. R.

Basic processes in intellectual development. In Deutsch

(Ed.), Social class, race and psychological development. New York: Holt, 1968.

Jensen

A. R.

Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press, 1980.

Potthoff

R. F.

Statistical aspects of the problem of biases in psychological testing. Institute of statistics Mimeo. Series No. 479. Chapel Hill: Department of Statistics, 1966. (Mimeographed)

Public Law 94-142, 94th Congress, 89 Stat. 773 (1975) (codified at 20 U.S.C. 1401-1461 (1978).

10.

Reynolds

C. R.

Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In Berk

R. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

11.

Reynolds

C. R.

Gutkin

T. B.

A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980, 8(2), 237–243.

12.

Reynolds

Hartlage

A comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with black and white referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 589–591.

13.

Reynolds

C. R.

Nigl

A regression analysis of differential validity in intellectual assessment for black and white inner city children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1981, 10(3), 176–179.

14.

Schmidt

F. L.

Pearlman

Hunter

The validity and fairness of employment and educational tests for Hispanic Americans: A review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33(4), 705–724.

15.

Valdez

R. S.

Prediction of achievement on the PIAT and WRAT from the WISC-R for Mexican-American students referred for psychological evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1982, 43, 408. (University Microfilms No. DA 8215517)

16.

Warner

M. M.

Schumaker

Alley

Deshler

Learning disabled adolescents in the public schools: Are they different from other low achievers?

Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1980, 1(2), 27–36.