Based on a critical review of research on the human figure-drawing performance of learning disabled children, it is concluded that such research is sparse and suffers from methodological weaknesses, particularly vague and shifting sample selection criteria. As a result, it has contributed little to our understanding of learning disorders in children or added to current knowledge of specific relevance to the child clinician. Suggestions for future research directions and implications of this research for the child clinician are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresA.J. (1975). Southern California postrotary nystagmus test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
2.
AyresA.J. (1978). Learning disabilities and the vestibular system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 18–29.
3.
BacharaG.H.ZabaJ.N.RaskinL.M. (1975). Human figure drawings by children with learning and visual perceptual problems. Academic Therapy, 11, 217–222.
BenderL. (1968). Neuropsychiatric disturbances. In KeeneyA.H.KeeneyV.T. (Eds.), Dyslexia - Diagnosis and treatment of reading disorders (pp. 42–48). St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.)
6.
BlackF.W. (1976). The size of human figure drawings of learning disabled children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 736–741.
7.
ColliganR. (1967). Learning inhibitions in children related to their human figure drawings. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 328–330.
8.
ConnorsC.K. (1971). The effect of stimulant drugs on human figure drawings in children with minimal brain dysfunction. Psychopharmacologia, 19, 329–333.
9.
DeanR.S. (1984). Commentary on personality assessment in the schools: The special issue. School Psychology Review, 13, 95–98.
10.
EnoL.ElliottC.WoehlkeP. (1981). Koppitz emotional indicators in the human figure drawings of children with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 15, 459–470.
11.
EppsS.AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ.E. (1983). Impact of different definitions of learning disabilities on the number of students identified. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 341–352.
12.
FeherE.VandecreekL.TeglasiH. (1983). The problem of art quality in the use of human figure drawing tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 268–275.
13.
GittelmanR. (1980). Role of psychological tests for differential diagnosis in child psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 19, 413–438.
14.
GounardB.R.PrayR.C. (1975). Human figure drawings of learning disabled and normal children at three age levels. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 914.
15.
HarrisD.B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
16.
HartmanR.K. (1972). An investigation of the incremental validity of human figure drawings in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 9–16.
17.
IngramT.T.S.MasonA.W.BlackburnI.A. (1970). A retrospective study of 82 children with reading disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 12, 271–281.
18.
JohnsonD.J.MyklebustH.R. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.
19.
KoppitzE.M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children's human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
20.
KoppitzE.M. (1983). Projective drawings with children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 12, 421–427.
21.
LehmanE.B.LevyB.I. (1971). Discrepancies in estimates of children's intelligence: WISC and human figure drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 74–76.
22.
LubinB.LarsenR.M.MatarazzoJ.D. (1984). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935–1982. American Psychologist, 39, 451–454.
23.
MartinR.D. (1983). The ethical issues in the use and interpretation of the Draw-A-Person Test and other similar procedures. The School Psychologist, 38, 6; 8.
24.
McAninchM. (1966). Body image as related to perceptual-cognitive-motor disabilities. In HellmuthJ. (Ed.), Learning disorders: Vol. 2 (pp. 139–170). Seattle: Special Child Publications.)
25.
MillichapJ.AymatF.SturgisL.H.LarsenK.W.EganR.A. (1968). Hyperkinetic behavior and learning disorders: Battery of neuropsychological tests in controlled trials of methylphenidate. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 116, 235–244.
26.
MooreS.M. (1982). Diagnostic implications in the human figure drawings of learning disabled children, aged 6–12. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42 (11-B), 4596.
27.
NeeperR.LaheyB.B. (1984). Learning disabilities of children. In WalkerC.E.RobertsM.C. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical child psychology (pp. 680–696). New York: Wiley.)
28.
OttenbacherK.HaleyD.AbbottC.WatsonP. (1984). Human figure drawing ability and vestibular processing dysfunction in learning-disabled children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1084–1089.
29.
PageJ.G.BernsteinJ.E.JanickiR.S.MichelliF.A. (1974). A multiclinic trial of Pemoline in childhood hyperkinesis. In ConnorsK. (Ed.), Clinical use of stimulant drugs in children. The Hague, Netherlands: Excerpta Medica.)
30.
PalomboJ.FeigonJ. (1984). Borderline personality development in childhood and its relationship to neurocognitive deficits. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 1, 18–33.
31.
PattersonJ.G.JanzenH.L. (1984). Another reply to Martin: Projective procedures - an ethical dilemma. The School Psychologist, 38, 8–9.
32.
PikulskiJ.J. (1972). A comparison of figure drawings and WISC IQs among disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 156–159.
33.
ProutH.T. (1983). School psychologists and social-emotional assessment techniques: Patterns in training and use. School Psychology Review, 12, 377–383.
34.
RaskinL.M.BloomA.S. (1979). Kinetic family drawings by children with learning disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 4, 247–251.
35.
RaskinL.M.Pitcher-BakerG. (1977). Kinetic family drawings by children with perceptual-motor delays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 370–374.
36.
RourkeB. (1985). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
37.
SandersM. (1983, July). Assessing the interaction of learning disabilities and social-emotional development. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 37–47.
38.
ScottL.H. (1981). Measuring intelligence with the Goodenough-Harris drawing test. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 483–505.
39.
StaffenP.M.FriersonE.C. (1967). Terms associated with learning disabilities. In FriersonE.C.BarbeW.B. (Eds.), Educating children with learning disabilities (pp. 489–493). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.)
40.
SwensonC.H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.
41.
VukovichD.H. (1983). The use of projective assessment by school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 12, 358–364.
42.
WagnerR.F. (1980). Human figure drawings of learning disabled children. Academic Therapy, 16, 37–41.
43.
WatsonP.J.OttenbacherK.ShortM.A.KittrellJ.WorkmanE. (1981). Human figure drawings of learning disabled children with hyporesponsive postrotary nystagmus. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 1, 21–26.
