This paper examines recent developments in meta-study in sociology which involves metatheory, metamethod, and meta-data-analysis. It argues that the three branches of meta-study, though previously unrelated, are now rapidly converging, signaling, among other things, the existence of a sustained crisis in the discipline. It concludes that meta-study will continue to grow in sociology for some time to come.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Volume I. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
2.
AlexanderJeffrey C.GiesenBernhardMünchRichardSmelserNeil J., eds. 1987. The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
3.
BeckerHoward S.GeerBlanche. 1957. “Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison.”Human Organization16: 28–32
4.
BergerJosephZelditchMorrisJr.AndersonBo. 1990. Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
5.
BlalockHubert M.Jr.1969. Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
6.
BlumerHerbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
7.
BrewerJohnHunterAlbert. 1989. Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Style. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
8.
BrewerMarilynn B.CollinsBarry E., eds. 1981. Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
9.
BrownRichard. 1987. Society as Text: Essays on Rhetoric, Reason and Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10.
CampbellDonald T.FiskeDonald W., 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.”Psychological Bulletin56: 81–105
11.
CicourelAaron. 1964. Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: The Free Press
12.
ColemanJames. 1987. “Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior.” Pp. 153–173 in The Micro-Macro Link, edited by JeffreyC.AlexanderBernhard GiesenMünchRichardSmelserNeil J., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
13.
CollinsRandall. 1986. “Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?”American Journal of Sociology91: 1336–55
CookThomas D.ReichardtCharles S., eds. 1979. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
16.
CooperHarris M.1984. The Integrative Research Review: A Systematic Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
17.
DubinRobert. 1969. Theory Building. New York: The Free Press
18.
EckbergDouglas L.HillLesterJr.1979. “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review.”American Sociological Review44: 925–937
19.
EffratAndrew. 1972. “Power to the Paradigms: An Editorial Introduction.”Sociological Inquiry42: 3–33
20.
FieldingNigel G.FieldingJane L., 1986. Linking Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
21.
FiskeDonald W.SchwederRichard A., eds. 1986. Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralism and Subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
22.
FriedrichsRobert W.1970. A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press
23.
FuhrmanEllsworth R.SnizekWilliam. 1990. “Neither Proscience nor Antiscience: Metasociology as Dialogue.”Sociological Forum5: 17–36
24.
FurfeyPaul H. [1953] 1965. The Scope and Method of Sociology: A Metasociological Treatise. New York: Cooper Square
25.
GephartRobert P.Jr.1988. Ethnostatistics: Qualitative Foundations for Quantitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
26.
GibbsJack. 1972. Sociological Theory Construction. Hinsdale, IL.: The Dryden Press
27.
GlassGene V.1976. “Primary, Secondary and Meta-Analysis of Research.”Educational Researcher5: 3–8
28.
GouldnerAlvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books
29.
HageJerald. 1972. Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology. New York: Wiley
30.
HammersleyMartin. 1989. The Dilemma of Qualitative Method. New York: Routledge
31.
HarveyLee1987. “The Nature of ‘Schools' in the Sociology of Knowledge: The Case of the ’Chicago School.‘”Sociological Review35: 245–278
32.
KuhnThomas. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
33.
HomansGeorge C.1984. Coming to My Senses: The Autobiography of a Sociologist. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books
34.
HunterJohn E.SchmidtFrank L., 1989. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
35.
IanniFrancis A.J.OrrMargaret T., 1979. “Toward a Rapprochement of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies.” Pp. 87–97 in Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, edited by CookThomas D.ReichardtCharles S., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
36.
IrwinJohn. 1987. “Reflections on Ethnography.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography16: 41–48
37.
JacobyWilliam G.1991. Data, Theory and Dimensional Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
38.
KalbergStephen. 1983. “Max Weber's Universal-Historical Architechtonic of Economically-Oriented Action: A Preliminary Construction.” Pp. 253–288 in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 4, edited by McNallScott. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
39.
KirkJeromeMillerMarc L., 1986. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
40.
KraghHelge. 1987. An Introduction to the Historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
41.
McMullinErnan. 1970. “The History and Philosophy of Science: A Taxonomy.” Pp. 12–67 in Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, edited by StuewerRoger H., Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press
42.
MertonRobert K. [1957] 1964. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press
43.
MullinsNicholas C.1971. The Art of Theory Construction and Use. New York: Harper and Row
44.
MullinsNicholas C.1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper and Row
OakesGuy1975. “Introductory Essay.” Pp. 1–49 in WeberMax, Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics. Translated by OakesGuy.New York: Free Press
47.
OsterbergDag1988. Metasociology: An Inquiry into the Origins and Validity of Social Thought. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press
48.
ParsonsTalcott. [1937] 1968. The Structure of Social Action. New York: The Free Press
49.
ParsonsTalcott. 1979. “On Theory and Metatheory.”Humboldt Journal of Social Relations7: 5–16
50.
PawsonRay1989. A Measure for Measures: A Manifesto for Empirical Sociology. London and New York: Routledge
51.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
52.
ReynoldsPaul D.1971. A Primer in Theory Construction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
53.
RichmanHoward P.1983. The Adventure of Reason. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
54.
RitzerGeorge. [1975] 1980. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
55.
RitzerGeorge. 1980. “Sociological Metatheory: A Defense of a Subfield by a Delineation of its Parameters.”Sociological Theory6: 187–200
56.
RitzerGeorge. 1990a. “Metatheorizing in Sociology.”Sociological Forum5: 3–15
57.
RitzerGeorge, ed. 1990b. Frontiers of Sociological Theory: The New Syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press
58.
RitzerGeorge. 1991a. “Explaining the Recent Coming of Age of Metatheorizing in Sociology.” In Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age, edited by RitzerGeorge. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Forthcoming
59.
RitzerGeorge. 1991b. Metatheorizing in Sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
60.
RitzerGeorge. 1991c. Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Forthcoming
61.
RosenbergAlexander. 1988. Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
62.
RosenthalRobert. 1984. Meta-Analytic Procedure for Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
63.
SkocpolTheda. 1987. “The Dead End of Metatheory.”Contemporary Sociology16: 10–12
64.
StinchcombeArthur L.1968. Constructing Social Theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
65.
TiryakianEdward A.1979. “The Significance of Schools in the Development of Sociology.” Pp. 211–223 in Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research, edited by SnizekW.FuhrmanE.R.MillerM.K., Westport CT: Greenwood Press
66.
TrendMartin. G.1978. “On the Reconciliation of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis: A Case Study.”Human Organization37: 345–354
67.
TudorAndrew. 1982. Beyond Empiricism: Philosophy of Science in Sociology. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul
68.
TurnerJonathan H.1986. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Fourth edition. Chicago, IL.: The Dorsey Press
69.
TurnerJonathan H.1989. Theory Building in Sociology: Assessing Theoretical Cumulation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
70.
TurnerJonathan H.1990. “The Misuse and Use of Metatheory.”Sociological Forum5: 37–54
71.
TurnerStephen P.1980. Sociological Explanation as Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
72.
TurnerStephen P.TurnerJonathan H., 1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
73.
VincentMyers. 1977. “Toward A Synthesis of Ethnographic and Survey Methods.”Human Organization36: 244–251
WallaceWalter. 1971. The Logic of Science in Sociology. Chicago: Aldine
76.
WebbEugene J.CampbellDonald T.SchwartzRichard D.SechrestLeeGroveJanet Belew. [1966] 1981. Non-reactive Measures in the Social Sciences. Second edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
77.
WeinsteinDeenaWeinsteinMichael. 1991. “The Postmodern Discourse of Metatheory.” In Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age, edited by RitzerGeorge. Newbury Park: Sage. Forthcoming
78.
WileyNorbert. 1979. “The Rise and Fall of Dominating Theories in American Sociology.” Pp. 47–79 in Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research, edited by SnizekW.FuhrmanE.R.MillerM.K., Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
79.
WileyNorbert. 1988. “The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory.”Sociological Theory6: 254–261
80.
WilierDavid. 1967. Scientific Sociology: Theory and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
81.
WolfFrederic. M.1986. Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
82.
ZetterbergHans L.1963. On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster
