The current debates on metatheory in sociology do not account for the fact that metatheorizing, as a distinct intellectual activity, is unequally distributed throughout the sciences. As a reflexive and critical subspecialty, metatheory and metasociology are more likely to routinely accompany work in loosely coupled and highly controversial disciplines. The theory of scientific organizations explains the propensity for metatheorizing as the outcome of weak and conversational fields that rely mostly on texts to support their discourse.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1982–1983. Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Four volumes. Berkeley: University of California Press
2.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1987. “The Centrality of the Classics.” Pp. 11–57 in Social Theory Today, edited by GiddensAnthonyTurnerJonathan. Cambridge: Polity Press
3.
AshmoreMalcolm. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
4.
BazermanCharles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
5.
Ben-DavidJosephCollinsRandall. 1966. “Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology.”American Sociological Review31: 451–465
6.
BijkerWiebe E.HughesThomas P.PinchTrevor J., eds. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press
7.
BloorDavid. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
8.
BloorDavid. 1983. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press
9.
BrownRichard H.1987. Society as Text. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10.
CallonMichel. 1986. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network. The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” Pp. 19–34 in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, edited by CallonMichelLawJohnRipArie. London: Macmillan
11.
CallonMichelLawJohnRipArie, eds. 1986. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan
12.
ColeJonathan R.ColeStephen. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13.
CollinsH.M.1985. Changing Order. London: Sage
14.
CollinsH.M.PinchTrevor J., 1982. Frames of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
15.
CollinsRandall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press
16.
CollinsRandall. 1986. “Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?”American Journal of Sociology91: 1336–1355
17.
CollinsRandall. 1989a. “Toward a Theory of Intellectual Change. The Social Causes of Philosophies.”Science, Technology and Human Values14: 107–140
18.
CollinsRandall. 1989b. “Sociology: Proscience or Antiscience?”American Sociological Review54: 124–139
19.
CollinsRandallRestivoSal. 1983. “Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science.”Canadian Journal of Sociology8: 199–227
20.
CraneDiana. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
21.
DouglasMary. 1970. Natural Symbols. New York: Pantheon
22.
EdmondsonRicca. 1984. Rhetoric in Sociology. London: Macmillan
23.
Evans-PritchardEdward E.1976. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon
24.
FiskeDonald W.ShwederRichard A., eds. 1986. Metatheory in Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
25.
FuchsStephan. 1986. “The Social Organization of Scientific Knowledge.”Sociological Theory4: 126–142
26.
FuchsStephan. 1991. “Toward a General Theory of Scientific Change.” Under Review
27.
FuchsStephan. 1992a. The Professional Quest for Truth. A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany: SUNY Press. In press
28.
FuchsStephan. 1992b. “Relativism and Reflexivity in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” in Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age. edited by RitzerGeorge. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Forthcoming
29.
FuchsStephan. 1992c. “Hermeneutics as Organizational Politics.”Current Perspectives in Social Theory. Forthcoming
30.
FuchsStephanTurnerJonathan. 1986. “What Makes a Science Mature?”Sociological Theory4: 143–150
31.
FuchsStephanWardSteven C., 1991. “Legal Case- and Scientific Fact Building.” Forthcoming
32.
FuhrmanEllsworthSnizekWilliam. 1990. “Neither Proscience nor Antiscience. Metasociology as Dialogue.”Sociological Forum5: 17–36
33.
GarfinkelHaroldLynchMichaelLivingstonEric. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences11: 131–158
34.
GibbsJack P.1989. Control: Sociology's Central Notion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
35.
GilbertG. NigelMulkayMichael. 1984. Opening Pandora's Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36.
HargensLowell. 1988. “Scholarly Consensus and Rejection Rates.”American Sociological Review53: 139–151
37.
Knorr-CetinaKarin D.1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press
38.
KuhnThomas S.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
39.
KuhnThomas S.1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
40.
LatourBruno. 1987. Science in Action. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
41.
LatourBruno. 1988a. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
42.
LatourBruno. 1988b. “The Politics of Explanation.” Pp. 155–176 in Knowledge and Reflexivity, edited by WoolgarSteve. London: Sage
43.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve. 1986. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Second edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press
44.
LawJohn. 1986. “Laboratories and Texts.” Pp. 35–50 in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, edited by CallonMichelLawJohnRipArie. London: Macmillan
45.
LevineDonald. 1986. “The Forms and Functions of Social Knowledge.” Pp. 271–283 in Metatheory in Social Science, edited by FiskeDonaldShwederRichard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
46.
MannheimKarl. 1939. Ideology and Utopia. New York: HBJ
47.
MertonRobert K.ZuckermanHarriet. 1973. “Institutionalized Patterns of Evaluation in Science.” Pp. 460–496 in MertonRobert, The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
48.
OveringtonMichael. 1979. “Doing What Comes Rationally. Some Developments in Metatheory.”American Sociologist14: 2–12
49.
PickeringAndrew. 1984. Constructing Quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
50.
PriceDerek J. deSolla. 1986. Little Science, Big Science … And Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press
RitzerGeorge. 1990. “Metatheorizing in Sociology.”Sociological Forum5: 3–15
53.
RitzerGeorge. 1991. Metatheorizing in Sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
54.
ShwederRichard A.FiskeDonald. 1986. “Introduction: Uneasy Social Science.” Pp. 1–18 in Metatheory in Social Science, edited by FiskeDonaldShwederRichard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
55.
SkocpolTheda. 1987. “The Dead End of Metatheory.”Contemporary Sociology16: 10–12
56.
TraweekSharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
57.
TurnerBryan S.1989. “Commentary: Some Reflections on Cumulative Theorizing in Sociology.” Pp. 131–147 in Theory Building in Sociology, edited by TurnerJonathan. London: Sage
58.
TurnerJonathan. 1985. “In Defense of Positivism.”Sociological Theory3: 24–30
59.
TurnerJonathan. 1990. “The Misuse and Use of Metatheory.”Sociological Forum5: 37–53
60.
TurnerJonathan H.1991. “Developing Cumulative and Practical Knowledge Through Metatheorizing.”Sociological Perspectives34: 249–268
61.
TurnerStephenTurnerJonathan H., 1990. The Impossible Science. London: Sage
62.
WeinsteinDeenaWeinsteinMichael. 1991. “The Postmodern Discourse of Metatheory.” In Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age, edited by RitzerGeorge. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Forthcoming
63.
WellmanBarryBerkowitzS.D., eds. 1988. Social Structures. A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
64.
WhitleyRichard. 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon
65.
WoolgarSteve, ed. 1988. Knowledge and Reflexivity. London: Sage
66.
ZuckermanHarriet. 1977. The Scientific Elite. New York: Free Press
67.
ZuckermanHarriet. 1988. “The Sociology of Science.” Pp. 511–574 in Handbook of Sociology, edited by SmelserNeil J., Newbury Park: Sage
