Sociologists have been unusually reluctant to incorporate into their explanatory systems the theoretical insights of evolutionary biology, behavioral ecology, and population genetics. This skepticism toward genuinely evolutionary approaches is expressed, to varying degrees, in the reactions of Freese and Maryanski to my essay on neo-Darwinian sociology. In this brief response to their comments, I suggest that these general reservations are grounded in an unnecessary fear of resurgent Social Darwinism, unwarranted concerns regarding determinism and reductionism, unjustified allegations of teleology and tautology, and/or general misconceptions of the logic and principles of neo-Darwinian theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderRichard D.1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
2.
BarkowJerome H.1989. Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
BrownDonald E.1991. Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
CaldwellJohn C.1976. “Toward a Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory.”Population and Development Review2: 321–366.
5.
CareyArlenLopreatoJoseph. 1994. “Sociobiology and the Wayward Critic.”Sociological Perspectives37(3): 403–430.
6.
ChangeauxJean-Pierre. 1985. Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
CountEarl. 1958. “The Biological Basis of Human Sociality.”American Anthropologist60: 1049–1085.
8.
CrippenTimothy. 1994. “Toward a Neo-Darwinian Sociology: Its Nomological Principles and Some Illustrative Applications.”Sociological Perspectives37(3): 309–335.
9.
CroninHelena. 1991. The Ant and the Peacock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DawkinsRichard. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeglerCarl N.1991. In Search of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
HamiltonWilliam D.1964. “The Genetical Theory of Social Behaviour. I and II.”Journal of Theoretical Biology7: 1–52.
13.
KonnerMelvin. 1982. The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
LenskiGerhard. 1966. Power and Privilege. New York: McGraw-Hill.
LopreatoJoseph. 1984. Human Nature and Biocultural Evolution. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
17.
MaryanskiAlexandraTurnerJonathan. 1992. The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
MillsSusan K.BeattyJohn H., 1984. “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.” Pp. 34–57 in Conceptual Issues in Biology, edited by SoberE., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
NamboodiriKrishnan. 1988. “Ecological Demography: Its Place in Sociology.”American Sociological Review53: 619–633.
20.
NielsenFrancois. 1994. “Sociobiology and Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology20: 267–303.
21.
SmithEric AldenWinterhalderBruce. 1992. “Natural Selection and Decision-Making: Some Fundamental Principles.” Pp. 25–60 in Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, edited by SmithE. A.WinterhalderB., New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
SymonsDonald. 1992. “On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior.” Pp. 137–159 in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ., New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
TriversRobert. 1971. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.”Quarterly Review of Biology46: 35–47.
24.
ToobyJohnCosmidesLeda. 1989. “Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture,” Part I: “Theoretical Considerations.”Ethology and Sociobiology10: 29–49.
25.
van den BerghePierre L.1981. The Ethnic Phenomenon. New York: Elsevier.
26.
WilliamsGeorge C.1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
WilsonEdward O.1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28.
WilsonEdward O.1978. On Human Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
