Much of the research on voluntary associations has argued that commitment to the group determines member participation and persistence. In this framework, highly committed members participate to a greater degree than less committed members, and maintain their connection with the group over longer periods of time. Less committed members, on the other hand, participate sporadically, and tend to drop their memberships easily. This commitment thesis implies a positive relationship between participation and persistence: the more the member participates, the longer the duration of membership. We argue that this individual level thesis should be supplanted by a system level understanding, in which the competition among social groups for individual resources determines persistence and participation. This competition thesis predicts a negative relationship between persistence of membership and participation in group activities: the more the member participates, the shorter the average duration of membership. We use event history analysis to test these opposing hypotheses on a sample of 1587 membership spells covering a fifteen year time period. We find strong and consistent support for the competition thesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerHoward S.1960. “Notes on the Concept of Commitment.”American Journal of Sociology66:32–40.
2.
BoothAlanBabchukNicholas. 1969. “Personal Influence Networks and Voluntary Association Affiliation.”Sociological Inquiry39:179–188.
3.
CoxD.R.1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.”Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietyB34:187–220.
CressDaniel M.1991. Federated Structures, Centralized Structures and Membership Duration: An Examination of the McCarthy and Zald Thesis. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ.M.1959. “Cognitive Consequences of Force Compliance.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology58:203–210.
7.
FernandezRobertoMcAdamDoug. 1988. “Social Networks and Social Movements: Multiorganizational Fields and Recruitment to Mississippi Freedom Summer.”Sociological Forum3:357–382.
8.
FreedmanDeborahThorntonArlandCamburnDonaldAlwinDuaneYoung-DeMarcoLinda. 1982. “The Life History Calendar: A Technique for Collecting Retrospective Data.”Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
GouldRoger V.1990. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.”American Sociological Review56:716–729.
10.
GranovetterMark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
HallJohn R.1988. “Social Organization and Pathways of Commitment: Types of Communal Groups, Rational Choice Theory, and the Kanter Thesis.”American Sociological Review53:679–692.
12.
HeiderF.1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
13.
JohnsonNorman L.KotzSamuel. 1970. Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14.
KanterRosebeth. 1968. “Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities.”American Sociological Review33:499–517.
15.
KieferNicholas M.1988. “Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions.”Journal of Economic Literature26:646–679.
16.
KnokeDavid. 1990. Organizing for Collective Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
KnokeDavid. 1988. “Incentives in Collective Action.”American Sociological Review53:311–329.
18.
KnokeDavidWoodJames R.1981. Commitment in Voluntary Associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19.
KnokeDavidThomsenRandall. 1977. “Voluntary Association Membership Trends and the Family Life Cycle.”Social Forces56:48–65.
20.
KornhauserWilliam. 1962. “Social Bases of Political Commitment.” In Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by RoseH.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
MachalekRichardSnowDavid A.1992. “Conversion to New Religious Movements.” In Handbook of Cults and Sects in America, edited by BromelyD.HaddenJ.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
McAdamDoug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
McAdamDoug. 1989. “The Biographical Consequences of Activism.”American Sociological Review54:744–760.
24.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer. 1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
25.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82:1212–1242.
26.
McPhersonJ. Miller. 1981. “A Dynamic Model of Voluntary Affiliation.”Social Forces59:705–728.
27.
McPhersonJ. Miller. 1982. “Hypernetwork Sampling: Duality and Differentiation Among Voluntary Associations.”Social Networks3:225–249.
28.
McPhersonJ. Miller. 1983. “An Ecology of Affiliation.”American Sociological Review48:519–532.
McPhersonJ. MillerWestElizabethBarronDavid. 1989. The Market for Members: Competition, Facilitation and Inhibition in Voluntary Affiliation. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
31.
McPhersonJ. MillerRotoloThomas. 1995. “Testing a Dynamic Model of Social Composition: Diversity and Change in Voluntary Groups.”American Sociological Review.
32.
MoscoviciSergi. 1985. “Social Influence and Conformity.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by LindzeyG.AronsonE.New York: Random House.
33.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
OppKarl-Dieter. 1986. “Soft Incentives and Collective Action: Participation in the Anti-Nuclear Movement.”British Journal of Political Science16:87–112.
35.
OrumAnthony M.1966. “A Reappraisal of the Social and Political Participation of Negroes.”American Journal of Sociology72:32–46.
36.
PopielarzPamelaMcPhersonJ. Miller. 1995. “On the Edge: Niche Position and Membership Duration in Voluntary Associations.”American Journal of Sociology101:698–721.
37.
PutnamRobert. 1995. “Bowling Alone.”Journal of Democracy6:65–78.
38.
RosenblattP.C.1977. “Needed Research on Commitment in Marriage.” In Close Relationships: Perspectives on the Meaning of Intimacy, edited by LevingerG.RauschH.Amhurst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
39.
RotoloThomas. 1995. Occupational Ecology: An Evolutionary Theory of the Structure and Dynamics of the Social Composition of Occupations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
40.
SimmelGeorg. 1950. “Types of Social Relationships by Degrees of Reciprocal Knowledge of their Participants.” In The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by WolffK.New York: Free Press.
41.
SmithConstanceFreedmanAnne. 1972. Voluntary Associations: Perspectives on the Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
SnowDavid A.ZurcherLouis A.Ekland-OlsonSheldon. 1980. “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Micro-Structural Approach to Differential Recruitment.”American Sociological Review45:787–801.
43.
StarkR.BainbridgeW.S.1980. “Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects.”American Journal of Sociology85:1376–1395.
44.
StrykerSheldonStathamAnne. 1985. “Symbolic Interactionism and Role Theory.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by LindzeyG.AronsonE.New York: Random House.
TumaNancy B.HannanMichael T.1984. Social Dynamics: Model and Methods. New York: Academic Press.
47.
WilliamsJ. AllenJr.BabchukNicholasJohnsonDavid R.1973. “Voluntary Associations and Minority Status: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo, Black, and Mexican Americans.”American Sociological Review38:637–646.
48.
WrightCharles R.HymanHerbert H.1958. “Voluntary Association Memberships of American Adults: Evidence from National Sample Surveys.”American Sociological Review23:284–294.
49.
ZurcherLouisSnowDavid A.1981. “Collective Behavior: Social Movements.” In Social Psychology, edited by RosenbergM.TurnerR.New York: Basic Books.
