In comparative studies of language proficiency and grades, Filipino second generation youth look relatively successful and assimilated, echoing what we know about their parents: post-1965 Filipino immigrants are predominantly middle-class, college-educated, English-speaking professionals who have integrated easily into U.S. society. Based on fieldwork in two California sites, this paper examines some of the issues and problems confronting second generation Filipino youth. “The family” seems to offer an extremely magnetic and positive basis of Filipino identity for many children of immigrants, yet it is also a deep source of stress and alienation, which for some, has led to internal struggles and extreme despair as manifested by rates of depression and suicidal thoughts. More specifically, by focusing on the gap between family ideology and practices, this paper suggests that many Filipino second generation youth struggle with an emotional transnationalism which situates them between different and often conflicting generational and locational points of reference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaschLindaSchillerNina GlickBlancCristina Szanton. 1995. Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.
2.
AmadoCabezasShinagawaLarry HajimeKawaguchGary. 1986. “New Inquiries into the Socioeconomic Status of Pilipino Americans in California.”Amerasia13:1–21.
3.
CampomanesOscar V.1995. “Filipinos in the United States and their Literature of Exile.” Pp.159–192 in Discrepant Histories: Translocal Essays on Filipino Cultures, edited by RafaelVincent. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Ciria-CruzRene P. October 1994. “How Far Have We Come.”Filipinas3:40–44.
5.
EspirituYen Le. 1994. “The Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, and Class: The Multiple Identities of Second-Generation Filipinos.”Identities1:249–273.
6.
GuarnizoLuis Eduardo. (in press) “Transnationalism From Below: Social Transformation and the Mirage of Return Migration Among Dominican Transmigrants.”Identities.
7.
HirtzFrank. 1995. Managing Insecurity: State Social Policy and Family Networks in the Rural Philippines. Saarbrucken: Verlag fur Entwicklungspolitik.
8.
IletoReynaldo C.1979. Pasyon and Revolution: Popular Movements in the Philippines, 1840–1910. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
9.
KannLauraWarrenCharlesHarrisWilliamCollinsJanetDouglasKathyCollinsMary ElizabethWilliamsBarbaraRossJamesKolbeLloyd State, and Local YRBSS Coordinators. 1995. “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States 1993.”Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report44:1–56.
10.
KaoGrace. 1995. “Asian Americans as Model Minorities? A Look at Their Academic Performance of Immigrant Youth.”Social Science Quarterly76:1–19.
11.
KaoGraceTiendaMarta. 1995. “Optimism and Achievement: The Educational Performance of Immigrant Youth.”Social Science Quarterly76:1–19.
12.
KaplanAmy. 1990. “Romancing the Empire.”American Literary History3:659–690.
13.
KibriaNazli. 1993. Family Tightrope: The Changing Lives of Vietnamese Americans. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
KuoWen. 1984. “Prevalence of Depression among Asian-Americans.”The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease172:449–457.
15.
LauAngela. 1995a. “Filipino Girls Think Suicide at Number One Rate.”San Diego Union-Tribune, February 11: A-1.
16.
LauAngela. 1995b. “For Filipino Girls Who Have Considered Suicide.”Filipinas4:38–40.
17.
LynchFrankde GuzmanAlfonsoII eds. 1981. Four Readings on Philippine Values. Quezon City: Institute of Philippine Culture.
18.
McCoyAlfred W.1993. “An Anarchy of Families: The Historiography of State and Family in the Philippines.” Pp. 1–32 in An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines, edited by McCoyAlfred W.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19.
MertonRobert K.FiskeMarjorieKendallPatricia. 1990. The Focused Interview. New York: The Free Press.
20.
MorrisLydia. 1990. The Workings of the Household. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
OliverJ. EricGeyFredrickStilesJonBradyHenry. 1995. Pacific Rim States Asian Demographic Data Book. Oakland: University of California, Office of the President.
22.
OngAihwa. 1996“Citizenship as Subject-Making: Immigrants Negotiate Racial and Cultural Boundaries in the United States.”Cultural Anthropology37 (5):717–762.
23.
PortesAlejandro. 1995. “Segmented Assimilation Among New Immigrant Youth: A Conceptual Framework.” Pp. 71–76 in California's Immigrant Children, edited by RumbautRubén G.CorneliusWayne. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
24.
PortesAlejandro. 1996. “Introduction: Immigration and its Aftermath.” Pp. 1–17 in The New Second Generation, edited by PortesAlejandro. New York: Russell Sage.
25.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.1990. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
RumbautRubén G.1995. “The New Californians: Comparative Research Findings on the Educational Progress of Immigrant Children.” Pp. 17–70 in California's Immigrant Children, edited by RumbautRubén G.CorneliusWayne A.La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
27.
RumbautRubén G.1996. “The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-Esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants.” Pp. 119–170 in The New Second Generation, edited by PortesAlejandro. New York: Russell Sage.
28.
RumbautRubén G.1997. “Ties that Bind: Immigration and Immigrant Families in the United States.” Pp. 3–46 in Immigration and the Family: Research and Policy on U.S. Immigrants, edited by BoothAlanCrouterAnn C.LandaleNancy. Mahwah.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
RumbautRubén G.CorneliusWayne A. eds. 1995. California's Immigrant Children: Theory, Research, and Implications for Educational Policy. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
30.
SueStanleyMorishimaJames. 1988. The Mental Health of Asian Americans. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
TakakiRonald. 1989. Strangers From A Different Shore: A History of Asian Americans. Boston: Little, Brown.
32.
Tompar-Tiu*AuroraSustento-SenerichesJuliana. 1995. Depression and Other Mental Health Issues: The Filipino American Experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
University of California. 1995. “Final Report for New Students.” Oakland, CA: University of California, Office of the President.
34.
VegaWilliamRumbautRubén G.1991. “Ethnic Minorities and Mental Health.”Annual Review of Sociology17:351–383.
35.
WolfDiane Lauren. 1992. Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics and Rural Industrialization in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
WolfDianeHoffmanLisa. 1996. “Filipino Invisibility in the American Landscape.” Paper presented at Pacific Sociological Association, Seattle.
37.
WongMorrison G.HirschmanCharles. 1983. “Labor Force Participation and Socioeconomic Attainment of Asian American Women.”Sociological Perspectives26:423–446.
38.
WooDeborah. 1985. “The Socioeconomic Status of Asian American Women in the Labor Force: An Alternative View.”Sociological Perspectives28:307–338.
39.
YengoyanAramMakilPerla eds. 1984. Philippine Society and the Individual. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.
