Can democratic transitions be predicted? The elite-negotiation literature claims that the process is so complicated and contingent that the timing and process is unpredictable. The class-compromise framework, however, identifies structural conditions that make stabilization unlikely, specifying who will oppose the authoritarian regime and why. A “triggering” event—a collapse in export demand—also is identified that intensifies and extends opposition, making a transition likely within 1–3 years. To demonstrate the usefulness of the class-compromise framework, two very different authoritarian regimes are compared. In the Brazilian regime (1964–1985), the military ruled as an institution and pursued state-led development; the Chilean regime (1973–1989) was dominated by one general and was radically neo-liberal. Despite these differences, structural conditions pushed both regimes toward export-led growth and wage constraint, hurting workers and capitalists producing for the local market. When exports collapsed in the early 1980s, opposition spread and forced democratic transitions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderRobert J.1978. The Tragedy of Chile. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
2.
Anuário Estatístico do Brasil.Various years. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatístico.
3.
BaerWerner. 1983. The Brazilian Economy. NY: Praeger.
4.
BaloyraEnrique A.1987. “Democratic Transition in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 9–52 in Comparing New Democracies edited by BaloyraE.A.Boulder: Westview.
5.
BarreraManuelValenzuelaJ. Samuel. 1986. “The Development of Labor Movement Opposition to the Military Regime.” Pp. 230–269 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
BlockFred. 1977. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State.”Socialist Revolution May-June: 6–28.
7.
BlockFred. 1980. “Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects.” Pp. 227–242 in The Socialist Register, edited by SavilleJ.London: Merlin Press.
8.
CamperoGuillermo. 1991. “Entrepreneurs and the Military Regime.” Pp. 128–158 in The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990 edited by DrakeP.W.JaksícI.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
CardosoFernando Henrique. 1971. Ideologías de la burguesía industrial en sociedades dependientes (Argentina y Brasil). Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
10.
CardosoFernando Henrique. 1986. “Entrepreneurs and the Transition Process: The Brazilian Case.” Pp. 137–153 in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule Comparative Perspectives edited by O'DonnellG.SchmitterP.C.WhiteheadL.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
CardosoFernando HenriqueFalletoEnzo. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
CardosoElianaHelwegeAnn. 1992. Latin America's Economy: Diversity, Trends, and Conflicts. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
13.
CohenBernard P.1989. Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
14.
CohenYoussef. 1989. The Manipulation of Consent: The State and Working-Class Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
CohenYoussef. 1994. Radicals, Reformers, and Reactionaries: The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Collapse of Democracy in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CollierRuth BerinsCollierDavid. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
CollinsRandall. 1995. “Prediction in Macrosociology: The Case of the Soviet Collapse.”American Journal of Sociology100:1552–93.
18.
DayRichard B.1976. “The Theory of the Long Cycle: Kondratiev, Trotsky, Mandel.”New Left Review (Sept.-Oct.):67–82.
19.
DrakePaul W.SilvaEduardo. 1986. “Introduction: Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980–85.” Pp. 1–7 in Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980–85 edited by DrakeP.W.SilvaE.San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies; Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies; Institute for the Americas University of California at San Diego.
20.
EdwardsSebastianCox EdwardsAlejandra. 1987. Monetarism and Liberalization: The Chilean Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
21.
Encyclopedia Britannica Book of the Year. 1986. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc..
22.
EvansPeter. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
FaucherPhilippe. 1981. “The Paradise That Never Was: The Breakdown of the Brazilian Authoritarian Order.” Pp. 11–40 in Authoritarian Capitalism: Brazil's Contemporary Economic and Political Development edited by BruneauT.C.FaucherP.Boulder: Westview Press.
24.
Ffrench-DavisRicardo. 1986. “Import Liberalization: The Chilean Experience, 1973–1982.” Pp. 51–84 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
FlynnPeter. 1978. Brazil: A Political Analysis. Boulder: Westview Press.
26.
FoxleyAlejandro. 1983. Latin American Experiments in Neo-conservative Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
FoxleyAlejandro. 1986. “The Neoconservative Economic Experimentin Chile.” Pp. 13–50 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
FurtadoCelso. 1970. Obstacles to Development in Latin America. New York: Doubleday.
29.
GarretónManuel Antonio. 1986a. “The Political Evolution of the Chilean Military Regime and Problems in the Transition to Democracy.” Pp. 95–122 in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule Latin America edited by O'DonnellG.SchmitterP.C.WhiteheadL.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
GarretónManuel Antonio. 1986b. “Political Processes in an Authoritarian Regime: The Dynamics of Institutionalization and Opposition in Chile, 1973–1980.” Pp. 144–183 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
GarvyGeorge. 1943. “Kondratiev's Theory of Long Cycles.”The Review of Economic StatisticsXXV:203–20.”
32.
GasiorowskiMark J.1996. “An Overview of the Political Regime Change Data Set.”Comparative Political Studies29:469–483.
33.
GrugelJean. 1991. “Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Lessons from Latin America.”Political StudiesXXXIX:363–68.
34.
HechterMichael. 1995. “Introduction: Reflections on Historical Prophecy in the Social Sciences.”American Journal of Sociology100:1520–27.
35.
HoffmanHelga. 1989. “Poverty and Prosperity: What is Changing?” Pp. 197–232 in Social Change in Brazil, 1945–1985: The Incomplete Transition edited by BachaE.L.KleinH.S.Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
36.
HopkinsJack W.1983. Latin American and Caribbean Contemporary Record. NY: Holmes and Meier.
37.
KahilRaouf. 1973. Inflation and Economic Development in Brazil 1946–1963. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38.
KaufmanRobert K.1986. “Liberalization and Democratization in South America: Perspectives from the 1970s.” Pp. 85–107 in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives edited by O'DonnellG.SchmitterP.C.WhiteheadL.Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
39.
KayCristóbal. 1989. Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge.
40.
KiserEdgar. 1995. “What Can Sociological Theories Predict: Comment on Collins, Kuran, and Tilly.”American Journal of Sociology100:1611–15.
41.
KiserEdgarBarzelYoram. 1991. “The Origins of Democracy in England.”Rationality and Society3:396–422.
42.
KuczynskiPedro-Pablo. 1988. Latin American Debt. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
KuranTimur. 1995. “The Inevitability of Future Revolutionary Surprises.”American Journal of Sociology100:1528–51.
44.
LaclauErnesto. 1971. “Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America.”New Left Review67:19–38.
45.
LarrainFelipe. 1991. “The Economic Challenges of Democratic Development.” Pp. 276–301 in The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990 edited by DrakeP.W.JaksícI.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
46.
LiebersonStanley. 1992. “Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some Thoughts about Evidence in Sociology.”American Sociological Review57:1–15.
47.
LiebersonStanley. 1991. “Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Explanation of the Reasoning Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.”Social Forces81:34–61.
48.
LinzJuan J.StepanAlfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
LipsetSeymour M.BenceGyorgyi. “Anticipations of the Failure of Communism.”Theory and Society23:169–210.
50.
LovemanBrian. 1979. Chile The Legacy of Hispanic Capitalism. NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
MartzJohn D.1987. Petroleum and Politics in Ecuador. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
52.
MericleKenneth Scott. 1974. Conflict Regulation in the Brazilian Industrial Relations System. Wisconsin: Ph.D. dissertation.
53.
AlvesMoreiraHelenaMaria. 1985. State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.
54.
AlvesMoreira. 1988. “Dilemmas of the Consolidation of Democracy from the Top in Brazil: A Political Analysis.”Latin American Perspectives15:47–63.
55.
MorelMário1989. Lula o Metalúrgico: Anatomia de uma Liderança. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira.
56.
NeuhouserKevin. 1992. “Democratic Stability in Venezuela: Elite Consensus or Class Compromise?”American Sociological Review57:117–35.
57.
NeuhouserKevin. 1993. “Foundations of Class Compromise: A Theoretical Basis for Understanding Diverse Patterns of Regime Outcomes.”Sociological Theory11:96–116.
58.
NeuhouserKevin. 1996. “Limits on Authoritarian Imposition of Policy: Failed Ecuadoran Military Populism in Comparative Perspective.”Comparative Political Studies29:635–659.
59.
NorthDouglas C.WeingastBarry R.1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.”The Journal of Economic HistoryXLIX:803–832.
60.
O'DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhillipe C.1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
61.
OppenheimLois Hecht. 1993. Politics in Chile: Democracy, Authoritarianism, and the Search for Development. Boulder: Westview Press.
62.
PetrasJamesLeivaFernando Ignacio. 1988. “Chile: The Authoritarian Transition to Electoral Politics.”Latin American Perspectives15:97–114.
63.
PoulantzasNicos. 1976. The Crisis of the Dictatorships. London: New Left Books.
64.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1986. “Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy.” Pp. 47–63 in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O'DonnellG.SchmitterP.C.WhiteheadL.Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
66.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1991. “Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America.”Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
67.
RaginCharles C.1994. Constructing Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
68.
RemmerKaren L.1995. “New Theoretical Perspectives on Democratization.”Comparative Politics28:103–22.
69.
RootHilton L.1989. “Tying the King's Hands: Credible Commitments and Royal Fiscal Policy During the Old Regime.”Rationality and Society. 1:240–58.
70.
RueschemeyerDietrichStephensEvelyne HuberStephensJohn D.1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
SALA. See Statistical Abstract of Latin America.
72.
SilvaEduardo. 1991. “The Political Economy of Chile's Regime Transition: From Radical to ‘Pragmatic’ Neo-liberal Policies.” Pp. 98–127 in The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990 edited by DrakeP.W.JaksícI.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
73.
SingerPaul. 1985. “Capital and National State: A Historical Interpretation.” Pp. 17–42 in Capital and Labour in the Urbanized World edited by WaltonJ.Beverly Hills: Sage.
74.
SmithBrian H.TurnerFrederick C.1984. “Survey Research in Authoritarian Regimes: Brazil and the Southern Cone of Latin America since 1970.” Pp. 795–814 in Statistical Abstract of Latin AmericaVol. 23. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Studies Center.
75.
SmithWilliam C.1987. “The Political Transition in Brazil: Liberalization and Elite Conciliation to Democratization.” Pp. 179–240 in Comparing New Democracies edited by BaloyraE.A.Boulder: Westview Press.
76.
SpoonerMary Helen. 1994. Soldiers in a Narrow Land: The Pinochet Regime in Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.
77.
Statistical Abstract of Latin America. Various years. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Studies Center.
78.
StepanAlfred. 1971. The Military in Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
79.
StepanAlfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
80.
SummersRobertHestonAlan. 1984. “Improved International Comparisons of Real Product and Its Composition: 1950–1980.”The Review of Income and Wealth30:207–262.
81.
ValenzuelaArturo. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, Chile. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
82.
ValenzuelaArturoValenzuelaJ. Samuel. 1986. “Party Opposition under the Chilean Authoritarian Regime.” Pp. 184–229 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
83.
Veja. April 18, 1984.
84.
Veja. October 1, 1986.
85.
VergaraPilar. 1986. “Changes in the Economic Functions of the Chilean State under the Military Regime.” Pp. 85–116 in Military Rule in Chile edited by ValenzuelaJ.S.ValenzuelaA.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
86.
Visão. September 7, 1967.
87.
Visão. August 30, 1971.
88.
PeterWinn. 1986. Weavers of Revolution: The Yarur Workers and the Chilean Road to Socialism. NY: Oxford University Press.
89.
Yearbook of International Trade Statistics. Various years. NY: United Nations.
90.
Yearbook of Labour Statistics. Various years. Geneva: International Labor Office.
