The study of exchange in networks has been extremely fruitful, generating much theory and empirical analysis and uncovering basic structural principles governing the distribution of power in exchange networks. However, exchange is only one type of fundamental relation between actors. Willer's “Theory of Elementary Relations” proposes two others: coercion and conflict. There are several empirical studies of coercive relations but virtually no studies of conflict relations in networks. We propose a modified definition of conflict relations that we believe facilitates their experimental study. We then describe two experimental protocols designed to implement conflict relations as theoretical defined. Finally, we report on a study intended to evaluate the technical merits of each design and to provide a “proof of concept,” namely, that conflict relations in networks can be studied experimentally.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlalockHubert M.1987. “A Power Analysis of Conflict Processes,” edited by LawlerEdward J.MarkovskyBarry. Advances in Group Processes., Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
BrennanJohn. 1981. “Some Experimental Structures.” Pp. 189–204 in Networks Exchange and Coercion. The Elementary Theory and Its Applications, edited by WillerDavidAndersonBo. New York: Elsevier.
3.
HeckathornDouglas. 1980. “A Unified Model for Bargaining and Conflict.”Behavioral Science25:261–84.
4.
HeckathornDouglas. 1983. “Extensions of Power-Dependence Theory: The Concept of Resistance.”Social Forces61:1248–59.
5.
LovagliaMichaelSkvoretzJohnWillerDavidMarkovskyBarry. 1995. “Negotiated Exchanges in Social Networks.”Social Forces74:123–55.
6.
MarkovskyBarrySkvoretzJohnWillerDavidLovagliaMichael J.ErgerJeffrey. 1993. “The Seeds of Weak Power: An Extension of Network Exchange Theory.”American Sociological Review58:197–209.
7.
MarkovskyBarryWillerDavidPattonTravis. 1988. “Power Relations in Exchange Networks.”American Sociological Review53:220–36.
8.
MarkovskyBarry1990. “Theory, Evidence, and Intuition. (Reply to Yamagishi and Cook).”American Sociological Review55:300–05.
9.
NashJohn F.1950. “The Bargaining Problem.”Econometrica18:155–62.
SkvoretzJohnLovagliaMichael J.1995. “Who Exchanges with Whom: Structural Determinants of Exchange Frequency in Negotiated Exchange Networks.”Social Psychology Quarterly58:163–77.
12.
SkvoretzJohnWillerDavid. 1991. “Power in Exchange Networks: Setting and Structural Variations.”Social Psychology Quarterly54:224–38.
13.
SkvoretzJohn1993. “Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks.”American Sociological Review58:801–18.
14.
SkvoretzJohnWillerDavidFararoTom. 1993. “Toward Models of Power Development in Exchange Networks.”Sociological Perspectives36:95–115.
15.
SzmatkaJacekMazurJoanna. 1996. “Power Distribution in Conflict Networks.” First International Conference on Theory and Research in Group Processes. Krakow, Poland, June 18–21.
16.
SzmatkaJacekSozanskiTadMazurJoannaSkvoretzJohn. 1996. “Methodological Considerations in the Study of Conflict in Networks.” American Sociological Association Meetings. New York, 16–20 August.
17.
SzmatkaJacek1995. “Coercion, Confrontation, and Conflict. Further Steps Toward a Network Conflict Theory.” Eight Annual Group Processes Conference. Washington, D.C., August 19–23.
18.
SzmatkaJacekWillerDavid. 1995. “Exclusion, Inclusion, and Compound Connection in Exchange Networks.”Social Psychology Quarterly58:123–32.
19.
WellmanBarryBerkowitzS.D. Editors. 1988. Social Structures: A Network Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
WillerDavid. 1981. “The Basic Concepts of Elementary Theory.” Pp. 25–53 in Networks, Exchange and Coercion, edited by WillerDavidAndersonBo. New York: Elsevier.
21.
WillerDavid. 1984. “Analysis and Composition as Theoretic Procedures.”The Journal of Mathematical Sociology10:241–70.
22.
WillerDavid. 1987. Theory and Experimental Investigation of Social Structures. New York: Gordon and Breach.
23.
WillerDavid. 1992. “Predicting Power in Exchange Networks: A Brief History and Introduction to the Issues.”Social Networks14:187–211.
24.
WillerDavidAndersonBo Editors. 1981. Networks, Exchange and Coercion. The Elementary Theory and Its Applications. New York: Elsevier.
25.
WillerDavidMarkovskyBarry. 1993. “The Theory of Elementary Relations: Its Development and Research Program.” Pp. 323–63 in Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in Theory Growth, edited by BergerJosephMorrisZelditchJr.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
WillerDavidMarkovskyBarryPattonTravis. 1989. “Power Structures: Derivations and Applications of Elementary Theory.” Pp. 313–53 in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, edited by BergerJosephMorrisZelditchJr.Newbury Park: Sage.
27.
WillerDavidSzmatkaJacek. 1993. “Cross-national Experimental Investigations of Elementary Theory: Implications for the Generality of the Theory and the Autonomy of Structure.” Pp. 37–81 in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 10, edited by LawlerEdward J.MarkovskyBarryHeimerKarenO'BrienJodi. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
