To address the question of whether ideology or technology has been the more powerful force shaping societies and their development, log-linear models are used to assess the association of typologies based on religious beliefs and on subsistence technology with indicators of: (1) community size, (2) political complexity, (3) stratification, (4) marital patterns, and (5) premarital sex norms. Using data derived from Murdock's Ethnographic Atlas, the analysis suggests that, although ideology is significantly associated with a number of important societal variables, the effects of technology are generally more powerful, more widespread, and more robust.
BlalockHubert M.1979. Social Statistics. 3d edition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
CloggClifford C.EliasonScott1988. “Some Common Problems in Log-Linear Analysis.” Pp. 226–257 in Common Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, edited by LongJ. ScottBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
DavisJames A.1974. “Hierarchical Models for Significance Tests in Multivariate Contingency Tables: An Exegesis of Goodman's Recent Papers.” Pp. 189–231 in Sociological Methodology 1973–74, edited by CostnerHerbertSan Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5.
DuncanBeverlyDuncanOtis Dudley1978. Sex Typing and Social Roles: A Research Report. New York: Academic.
6.
EliasonScott R.1988. The Categorical Data Analysis System 3.0. University Park, PAScott R. Eliason.
7.
GoodmanLeo A.1972. “A Modified Multiple Regression Approach to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables.”American Sociological Review37: 28–46.
8.
HarrisMarvin1974. Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches: The Riddles of Culture. New York: Random House.
9.
HarrisMarvin1979. Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for the Science of Culture. New York: Random House.
10.
HeiseDavidLenskiGerhardWardwellJohn1976. “Further Notes on Technology and the Moral Order.”Social Forces55: 316–337.
11.
KnokeDavidBurkePeter J.1980. Log-Linear Models. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07–020. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
LeavittGregory C.1986. “Ideology and the Materialist Model of General Evolution: A Cross-Cultural Test of Subsystem Relationships.”Social Forces65: 525–553.
13.
LenskiGerhardLenskiJeanNolanPatrick1991. Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. 6th edition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
LenskiGerhardNolanPatrick1984. “Trajectories of Development: A Test of Ecological-Evolutionary Theory.”Social Forces63: 1–23.
SchwartzT. P.1975. Societal Energy Consumption: An Evolutionary Theory and a Preliminary Empirical Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
17.
SimpsonJohn H.1979. “Sovereign Groups, Subsistence Activities, and the Presence of a High God in Primitive Societies.” Pp. 299–310 in The Religious Dimension: New Directions in Quantitative Research, edited by WuthnowRobertNew York: Academic Press.
18.
SwansonGuy1960. Birth of the Gods. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
19.
WhiteLeslie1959. The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill.
