Hindu women's restrictions to the home and limited interactions with their husbands disadvantage Hindu women. These macro gender structures are constituted through microinteraction rituals. The article examines Hindu men's and women's microinteractions as a way of understanding Indian gender structure. Hindu men recognize their self-interest in these interaction rituals—they know that they benefit from women's subordination. Women's strategies of pursuing power and security in their husbands' families, moreover, often lead women into “bargains with patriarcy” that also contribute to the reconstitution of gender inequality in India.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BasuAmrita. 1992. Two Faces of Protest: Contrasting Modes of Women's Activism in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
BennettLynn. 1983. Dangerous Wives and Sacred Sisters: Social and Symbolic Roles of High-Caste Women in Nepal. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BerremanGerald D.1972. Hindus of the Himalayas: Ethnography and Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BerremanGerald D.1981. The Politics of Truth. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.
5.
BéteilleAndré.1991. “The Reproduction of Inequality: Occupation, Caste, and Family”. Contributions to Indian Sociology25: 3–28.
6.
CaimanLeslie J.1992. Toward Empowerment: Women and Movement Politics in India. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
CaplanPatricia. 1985. Class and Gender in India: Women and Their Organizations in a South Indian City. London: Tavistock.
8.
CarstairsG. Morris. 1967[1957]. The Twice-Born: A Study of a Community of High-Caste Hindus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
ChadhaAditi. 1986. “Eve-Teasing Analysed”. Hindustan Times, July 10.
10.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1990. Gender Equity: An Integrated Theory of Stability and Change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
CollierJane Fishburne. 1974. “Women in Politics”. Pp. 89–96 in Woman, Culture, and Society, edited by RosaldoM.Z.LamphereL.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
CollinsRandall. 1971. “A Conflict Theory of Sexual Stratification”. Social Problems19: 3–21.
13.
CollinsRandall. 1975. Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Social Science. New York: Academic Press.
14.
CollinsRandall. 1981. “On the Microfoundation of Macrosociology”. American Journal of Sociology86: 984–1014.
15.
CollinsRandall. 1987. “Interaction Ritual Chains, Power and Property: The Micro-Macro Connection as an Empirically Based Theoretical Problem”. Pp. 193–206 in The Micro-Macro Link, edited by AlexanderJ.C.GiesenB.MunchR.SmelserN.J.Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
ConnellR.W.1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Committee on the Status of Women in India. 1974. Toward Equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India. New Delhi: Government of India.
18.
DasVeena. 1976a. “Masks and Faces: An Essay on Punjabi Kinship”. Contributions to Indian Sociology10:1–30.
19.
DasVeena. 1976b. “Indian Women: Work, Power and Status.” Pp. 129–145 in Indian Women from Purdah to Modernity, edited by NandaB.R.New Delhi: Vikas.
20.
DernéSteve. 1992. “Beyond Institutional and Impulsive Conceptions of Self: Family Structure and the Socially Anchored Real Self”. Ethos20 (3): 259–288.
21.
DernéSteve. 1993. “Equality and Hierarchy Between Adult Brothers: Culture and Sibling Relations in North Indian Urban Joint Families”. Pp. 165–189 in Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and Sisters in Cultural Context, edited by NuckollsC.New York: Guilford.
22.
DernéSteve. 1994a. “Arranging Marriages: How Fathers' Concerns Limit Women's Educational Achievements”. In Women, Education, and Family Structure in India, edited by MukhopadhyayC.SeymourS.Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
DernéSteve. 1994b. “Violating the Hindu Norm of Husband-Wife Avoidance”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies25:249–267.
24.
DouglasMary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger.
25.
GaneshKamala. 1989. “Seclusion of Women and the Structure of Caste”. Pp. 75–96 in Gender and the Household Domain: Social and Cultural Dimensions, edited by KrishnarajM.ChananaK.New Delhi: Sage.
26.
HarlanLindsey. 1992. Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
HartmannHeidi. 1976. “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex”. Signs1 (Part 2): 137–169.
28.
HollandDorothy C.EisenhartMargaret A.1990. Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement and College Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
HomansGeorge C.1964. “Bringing Men Back In”. American Sociological Review29: 809–818.
30.
JacobsonDoranne. 1982. “Purdah and the Hindu Family in Central India”. Pp. 81–109 in Separate Worlds: Studies of Purdah in South Asia, edited by PapanekH.MinaultG.Delhi: Chanakya.
31.
JadwinLisa. 1992. “The Seductiveness of Female Duplicity in Vanity Fair”. Studies in English Literature32: 663–687.
32.
KakarSudhir. 1981. The Inner World: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Childhood and Society in India. 2nd edn.Delhi: Oxford University Press.
33.
KandiyotiDeniz. 1988. “Bargaining With Patriarchy”. Gender & Society2: 274–289.
34.
KishwarMadhu. 1991. “Introduction”. Pp. 1–49 in In Search of Answers: Indian Women's Voices from Manushi, edited by KishwarM.VanitaR.New Delhi: Horizon India Books.
35.
KishwarMadhuVanitaRuth, eds. 1991. In Search of Answers: Indian Women's Voices from Manushi. New Delhi: Horizon India Books.
36.
KolendaPauline. 1967. “Region, Caste, and Family Structure: A Comparative Study of The Indian ‘Joint’ Family”. Pp. 339–396 in Structure and Change in Indian Society, edited by SingerM.CohnB.Chicago: Aldine.
37.
KolendaPauline. 1978. Caste in Contemporary India: Beyond Organic Solidarity. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
38.
KolendaPauline. 1987“Marked Regional Differences in Family Structure in India”. Pp. 214–288 in Regional Differences in Family Structure in India, edited by KolendaP.Jaipur: Rawat.
39.
KolendaPauline. 1993. “Sibling Relations and Marriage Practices: A Comparison of North, Central, and South India”. Pp. 103–141 in Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and Sisters in Cultural Context, edited by NuckollsC.New York: Guilford.
40.
KumarNita. 1986. “Open Space and Free Time: Pleasure for the People of Banaras”. Contributions to Indian Sociology20:41–60.
41.
KumarNita. 1988. The Artisans of Banaras: Popular Culture and Identity, 1880–1986. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
KumarNita. 1992. Friends, Brothers, and Informants: Fieldwork Memoirs of Banaras. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
LiddleJoannaJoshiRama. 1986. Daughters of Independence: Gender, Caste and Class in India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44.
LuschinskyMildred Stroop. 1962. “The Life of Women in a Village of North India: A Study of Role and Status”. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
45.
MandelbaumDavid G.1970. Society in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
MandelbaumDavid G.1988. Women's Seclusion and Men's Honor: Sex Roles in North India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
47.
MarxKarlEngelsFrederick. 1970[1845–1846]. The German Ideology, Part One. New York: International Publishers.
48.
MinturnLeigh. 1993. Sita's Daughters: Coming Out of Purdah. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
MukhopadhyayCarolSeymourSusan. 1993. “Introduction”. Pp. 1–33 in Women, Education, and Family Structure in India, edited by MukhopadhyayC.SeymourS.Boulder, CO: Westview.
50.
NaderLaura. 1974. “Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying Up”. Pp. 284–311 in Reinventing Anthropology, edited by HymesD.New York: Vintage.
51.
ObeyesekereGananath. 1984. The Cult of the Goddess Pattini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
OmvedtGail. 1980. We Will Smash this Prison: Indian Women in Struggle. London: Zed.
53.
OrtnerSherry BWhiteheadHarriet. 1981. “Introduction: Accounting for Sexual Meanings”. Pp. 1–27 in Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, edited by OrtnerS.B.WhiteheadH.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
PandeyGyanendra. 1990. The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
55.
PapanekHanna. 1989. “Family Status-Production Work: Women's Contribution to Social Mobility and Class Differentiation”. Pp. 97–116 in Gender and the Household Domain: Social and Cultural Dimensions, edited by KrishnarajM.ChananaK.New Delhi: Sage.
56.
RahejaGloria GoodwinGoldAnn Grodzins. 1994. Listen to the Heron's Words: Reimagining Gender and Kinship in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57.
RaoV.V. PrakasaRaoV. Nandini. 1982. Marriage, The Family, and Women in India. New Delhi: Heritage.
58.
ReskinBarbara. 1988. “Bringing the Men Back In: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women's Work”. Gender & Society2: 58–81.
59.
RolandAlan. 1988. In Search of Self in India and Japan: Toward a Cross-Cultural Psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
ScheffThomas J.1990. Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
SeghalCharu. 1985. “Handicapped—by Gender or by Men's Attitudes”. Manushi (No. 29): 21–22.
62.
ShahAM. 1973. The Household Dimension of the Family in India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
63.
SharmaUrsula. 1978. “Women and their Affines: The Veil as Symbol of Separation”. Man13: 218–233.
64.
SharmaUrsula. 1980a. Women, Work and Property in North-west India. London: Tavistock.
65.
SharmaUrsula. 1980b. “Purdah and Public Space”. Pp. 213–239 in Women in Contemporary India and South Asia edited by DeSouzaA. New Delhi: Manohar.
66.
SharmaUrsula. 1989. “Studying the Household: Individuation and Values”. Pp. 35–54 in Society From the Inside Out: Anthropological Perspectives on the South Asian Household, edited by GrayJ.N.MearnsD.J.New Delhi: Sage.
67.
StandingHilary. 1991. Dependence and Autonomy: Women's Employment and the Family in Calcutta. New York: Routledge.
68.
SrinivasM.N.1969. Social Change in Modern India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
VatukSylvia. 1982. “Purdah Revisited: A Comparison of Hindu and Muslim Interpretations of the Central Meaning of Purdah in South Asia”. Pp. 54–78 in Separate Worlds: Studies of Purdah in South Asia, edited by PapanekHMinaultG.Delhi: Chanakya.
70.
VatukSylvia. 1989. “Making New Homes in the City: Urbanization and the Contemporary Indian Family”. Pp. 187–202 in Contemporary Indian Tradition, edited by BordenC. M.Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
