This paper gives an overview of Durkheim's ideas concerning knowledge in the broad sense in the period indicated It shows that the notion of collective consciousness was abandoned, and the principle of morphological determinism was retained, largely for rhetorical purposes. Durkheim's contradictory statements attest to a slow drift away from the conception which divides society into two parts, one determining the other. It is shown that the notion of collective representation replaces earlier conceptualizations. Durkheim considered collective representations as constituting a realm of social facts—indeed, the social sphere par excellence. The notion of collective representations played a crucial role in Durkheim's attempts to demonstrate the independence of sociology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Vol. 2: The Antinomies of Classical Thought Marx and Durkheim. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
BeillevairePatrick-Alban Bensa1984. “Mauss dans la tradition Durkheimienne. De l'individu à la personne” (Mauss in the Durkheimian Tradition: From the Individual to the Person). Critique40 (June-July): 532–541.
3.
BirnbaumPierre1969. “Cadres sociaux et représentations collectives dans l'oeuvre de Durkheim: L'exemple du Socialisme” (Social Conditions and Collective Representations in the Work of Durkheim: The Case of Socialism). Revue Française de Sociologie10: 3–11.
4.
DurkheimÉmile [1897] 1951. Suicide. Translated by SpauldingJohnSimpsonGeorge. New York: Free Press.
5.
DurkheimÉmile [1928] 1962. Socialism. Translated by SattlerCharlotte. New York: Collier Books.
6.
DurkheimÉmile [1925] 1963. L'Éducation Morale (Moral Education). New edition.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
7.
DurkheimÉmile [1898] 1965. “Individual and Collective Representations.” Pp. 1–34 in Sociology and Philosophy, translated by PocockD. F.London: Cohen & West. (Originally published in Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale6: 273–302.).
8.
DurkheimÉmile [1897] 1969a. “Antonio Labriola: Essais sur la conception matrialiste de l'histoire” (Antonio Labriola: Essays on the Materialist Conception of History). Pp. 245–254 in Journal Sociologique. Paris: PUF. (Originally published in Revue Philosophique44: 645–651.).
9.
DurkheimÉmile [1898] 1969b. “La Prohibition de l'Inceste et ses Origines” (The Prohibition of Incest and Its Origins). Pp. 245–254 in Journal Sociologique. Paris: PUF. (Originally published in Année Sociologique1:1–70.).
10.
DurkheimÉmile [1899] 1969c. “Morphologie Sociale” (Social Morphology). Pp. 181–182 in Journal Sociologique. Paris: PUF. (Originally published in Année Sociologique 2: 520–521.).
11.
DurkheimÉmile [1887] 1975. “Guyau M.: L'irréligion de l'avenir. Etude de Sociologie” (Guyau M.: The Future Irreligion, Sociological Study). Pp. 149–165 in Textes, Vol. 2: Religion, Morale, Anomie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit. (Originally published in Revue Philosophique 23: 299–311.).
12.
DurkheimÉmile1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. Translated by HallsW. D.New York: Free Press.
13.
DurkheimÉmile [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by HallsW. D.New York: The Free Press.
14.
DurkheimÉmile [1895] 1988a. Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique (The Rules of Sociological Method). New edition.Paris: Flammarion.
15.
DurkheimÉmile [1901] 1988b. “Préface” to the 2nd edition. Pp. 75–91 in Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique. New edition. Paris: Flammarion.
16.
DurkheimÉmile [1897] 1991. Le Suicide. Étude de Sociologie (Suicide: A Study in Sociology). 6th edition.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
17.
FauconnetPaulMaussMarcel [1901] 1969. “Sociologie.” Pp. 139–177 in Oeuvres, Vol. 3: Cohésion Sociale et Divisions de la Sociologie (Social Cohesion and the Subdivisions of Sociology), edited by MaussMarcelParis: Les Editions de Minuit. (Originally published in Grande Encyclopédie, Vol. 30, pp. 165–176.).
18.
FillouxJean-Claude1977. Durkheim et le Socialisme (Durkheim and Socialism). Geneva: Librairie Droz.
19.
HirstPaul Q.1975. Durkheim, Bernard and Epistemology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. LaCapra, Dominick. 1972. Émile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
20.
LalandeAndré.1960. Vocabulaire Technique et Critique de la Philosophie (Technical and Critical Dictionary of the Philosophy). 8th edition. (1st edition1902–1923). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21.
LenkKurt1972. Marx in der Wissensoziologie. Studien zur Rezeption der Marxschen Ideologiekritik (Marx in the Sociology of Knowledge: Studies in the Reception of the Marxian Critic of Ideology). Berlin: Luchterhand.
22.
LittréÉmile1968. Dictionnaire de la Langue Française (Dictionary of the French Language). Full edition. (1st edition1873). Paris: Gallimard-Hachette.
23.
DénesNémedi1991. “Durkheim and Hamelin.”Szociológiai Figyelô (Sociological Review, Budapest) 7(2): 101–118.
24.
NisbetRobert1974. The Sociology of Émile Durkheim. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
ParsonsTalcott1949. The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. 2nd edition.New York: The Free Press.
26.
StrenskiIvan1989. “Durkheim, Hamelin and the ‘French Hegel’”Historical Reflections16: 135–170.
27.
TurnerStephen P.1983–1984. “Durkheim as a Methodologist.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences13:425–450; 14:51–71.
