Many observers have lamented the fact that sociology continues to fragment into a number of allegedly incompatible theoretical camps. To countervail such sectarian tendencies, I suggest that we return to the writings of key thinkers in our field—here specifically Erving Goffman—and search for those findings, observations, concepts, or analyses which have found purchase across the discipline and which seemingly defy the forces of theoretical balkanization. This interparadigmatic dialogue on Goffman can be realized only if a concerted effort is made to bring together representatives of sociology's major theory groups to discuss their possibly varying interpretations of Goffman. Problems associated with launching such a unification project are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggerBen. 1991. “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance.”Annual Review of Sociology17: 105–131.
2.
BockP.K.1988. “The Importance of Erving Goffman to Psychological Anthropology.”Ethos16: 3–20.
3.
BurnsTom. 1992. Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge.
4.
ChrissJames J.1993a. “Durkheim's Cult of the Individual as Civil Religion: Its Appropriation by Erving Goffman.”Sociological Spectrum13: 251–275.
5.
ChrissJames J.1993b. “Looking Back on Goffman: The Excavation Continues.”Human Studies16: 469–483.
6.
ChrissJames J.1995a. “Testing Gouldner's Coming Crisis Thesis: On the Waxing and Waning of Intellectual Influence.” Pp. 33–61 in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 15, edited by AggerB.Greenwich: JAI Press.
7.
ChrissJames J.1995b. “Some Thoughts on Recent Efforts to Further Systematize Goffman.”Sociological Forum10 (1): 177–187.
8.
ChrissJames J.1995c. “Habermas, Goffman, and Communicative Action: Implications for Professional Practice.”American Sociological Review60: 545–565.
9.
ChrissJames J. In press. “Role Distance and the Negational Self.” In Goffman's Patrimony, edited by SmithG.W.H.London: Routledge.
10.
CloughPatricia T.1992. The End(s) of Ethnography: From Realism to Social Criticism. Newbury Park: Sage.
11.
CrookStephen. 1991. Modern Radicalism and Its Aftermath. London: Routledge.
EisenstadtS.N.1986. “Current Theoretical Developments, Research, and Controversies in Sociology.” Pp. 37–49 in Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980: What, Who, Where, How? edited by DeutschK.W.MarkovitsA.S.PlattJ.Lanham: University Press of America.
14.
FararoThomas J.1989. “The Spirit of Unification in Sociological Theory.”Sociological Theory7 (2): 175–190.
15.
FullerSteve. 1994. “Teaching Thomas Kuhn to Teach the Cold War Vision of Science.”Contention4 (1): 81–106.
16.
GoffmanErving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.”American Sociological Review48: 1–17.
17.
GouldnerAlvin W.1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic.
18.
HabermasJurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, translated by McCarthyT.Boston: Beacon Press.
19.
HabermasJurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, translated by McCarthyT.Boston: Beacon Press.
20.
HartlandN.G.1994. “Goffman's Attitude and Social Analysis.”Human Studies17: 251–266.
21.
JamesonFrederic. 1991. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
22.
JayMartin. 1988. “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on the Habermas-Gadamer Debate.” Pp. 17–36 in his Fin de Siecle Socialism. New York: Routledge.
23.
KuhnThomas S.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
ManningPhilip. 1992. Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27.
MullinsNicholas C.1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper and Row.
28.
NashBradleyJr.WardellMark. 1993. “The Control of Sociological Theory: In Praise of the Interregnum.”Sociological Inquiry63: 276–292.
29.
OppKarl-Dieter. 1970. “Theories of the Middle Range as a Strategy for the Construction of a General Sociological Theory.”Quality and Quantity4 (2): 243–253.
30.
OromanerMark. 1980. “Erving Goffman and the Academic Community.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences10: 287–291.
31.
PsathasGeorge. 1977. “Goffman's Image of Man.”Humanity and Society1: 84–94.
32.
PsathasGeorge. 1980. “Early Goffman and the Analysis of Face- to-Face Interaction in Strategic Interaction.” Pp. 52–79 in The View from Goffman, edited by DittonJ.New York: St. Martin's Press.
33.
PsathasGeorgeWakslerFrances C.1973. “Essential Features of Face-to-Face Interaction.” Pp. 159–183 in Phenomenological Sociology, edited by PsathasG.New York: Wiley.
34.
RigginsStephen (ed.) 1990. Beyond Goffman: Studies on Communication, Institution, and Social Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35.
RitzerGeorge. 1991. Metatheorizing in Sociology. Lexington: Lexington Books.
SmithGregory W.H. (ed.) In press. Goffman's Patrimony. London: Routledge.
40.
TraversAndrew. 1991. “From ‘Normal Appearances’ to ‘Simulation’ in Interaction.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior21: 297–337.
41.
TraversAndrew. 1992. “The Conversion of Self in Everyday Life.”Human Studies15: 169–238.
42.
TraversAndrew. 1994. “The Unrequited Self.”History of the Human Sciences7: 121–140.
43.
TseelonEfrat. 1992a. “Is the Presented Self Sincere? Goffman, Impression Management and the Postmodern Self.”Theory, Culture & Society9: 115–128.
44.
TseelonEfrat. 1992b. “Self-Presentation through Appearances: A Manipulative vs. a Dramaturgical Approach.”Symbolic Interaction15: 501–513.
45.
TurnerJonathan H.1989. “The Disintegration of American Sociology.”Sociological Perspectives32: 419–433.
46.
TurnerStephen P.TurnerJonathan H.1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park: Sage.
47.
WallaceWalter L.1994. A Weberian Theory of Human Society. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
48.
WileyNorbert. 1985. “The Current Interregnum in American Sociology.”Social Research52: 179–207.
49.
WileyNorbert. 1994. The Semiotic Self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
WilliamsRobin. 1988. “Understanding Goffman's Method.” Pp. 64–88 in Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, edited by DrewP.WoottonA.Cambridge: Polity Press.
