Initiated during the 1970s as a critique of mainstream stratification analysis, Neo-Marxist class-structure analysis seems to have reached an impasse by the late 1980s. In order to develop class analysis further, many analysts have called for a shift in orientation from the drawing of a static class structure map to the study of class struggle dynamics. Responding to this call, this paper develops a class struggle analysis for the study of politics and history. This analysis has three components: (1) The conditions of class struggle, focusing on class structure, protoclass, and movement organization; (2) The processes of class struggle, examining the struggles over class, consciousness, organization, goals, strategy, and boundary; and (3) The consequences of class struggle, investigating both the micro-level of subjective experience and the macro-level of class and structure. By bringing class struggle back into stratification theory, this new emphasis opens new research frontiers and sharpens the power of class analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerUwe1989. “Class Theory and the Social Sciences: Erik Olin Wright on Classes.”Politics and Society17: 67–88
2.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
3.
BourdieuPierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.”Sociological Theory7: 14–25
4.
BurawoyMichael. 1987. “The Limits of Wright's Analytical Marxism and Alternative.”Berkeley Journal of Sociology32: 51–72
5.
BurrisVal1987. “The Neo-Marxist Synthesis of Marx and Weber on Class.” Pp. 67–90 in The Marx-Weber Debate, edited by WileyNorbert. Newbury Park: Sage Publication
6.
CarchediGuglielmo. 1975. “Reproduction of Social Classes at the Level of Production Relationships.”Economy and Society4: 361–417
7.
CarchediGuglielmo. 1986. “Two Models of Class Analysis.”Capital and Class29: 194–215
8.
DahrendorfRalf. 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press
9.
DawsonMichael. 1990. “Revamping the Sociology of Class.”Sociological Perspectives33: 419–422
10.
De Ste. CroixGeoffrey. 1984. “Class in Marx's Conception of History, Ancient and Modern.”New Left Review146: 94–111
11.
DurkheimEmile. 1972. Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings, edited, translated, and with an introduction by GiddensAnthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12.
FriedmanSamuel R.1983. “Game Theory and Labor Conflict.”Sociological Perspectives26: 375–397
13.
GiddensAnthony. 1982. “Class Structuration and Class Consciousness.” Pp. 157–174 in Classes, Power, and Conflict, edited by GiddensAnthonyHeldDavid. Berkeley: University of California Press
14.
GiddensAnthony. 1985. “In Place of Emptiness.”New Society74: 383–384
15.
KamolnickPaul. 1988. Classes: A Marxist Critique. New York: General Hall
16.
MannMichael. 1986. “Classes, Swedes and Yanks.”Contemporary Sociology15: 837–839
17.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich. 1936. The German Ideology. New York: International Publishers
18.
MeiksinsPeter. 1987. “New Classes and Old Theories: The Impasse of Contemporary Class Analysis.” Pp. 64–95 in Recapturing Marxism, edited by LevineRhondaLembckeJerry. New York: Praeger
19.
MeiksinsPeter. 1988. “A Critique of Wright's Theory of Contradictory Class Locations.”Critical Sociology15: 73–82
20.
McNallScott G.1987. “Thinking about Social Class: Structure, Organization, and Consciousness.” Pp. 223–246 in Recapturing Marxism, edited by LevineRhondaLembckeJerry. New York: Praeger
O'ConnorJames. 1990. “The Second Contradiction of Capitalism: Causes and Consequences.” Paper presented to the conference on “New Economic Analysis,” Iniciativa per Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, December
23.
OffeClaus. 1985. Disorganized Capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press
24.
PoulantzasNicholas. 1973. “On Social Class.”New Left Review78: 27–54
25.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1977. “From Proletarian into Class: The Process of Class Formation from Karl Kautsky's The Class Struggle to Recent Debates.”Politics and Society7: 343–401
26.
ScottJoan. 1988. “Women in The Making of the Working Class.” Pp. 68–90 in Gender and the Politics of History, edited by ScottJoan. New York: Columbia University Press
27.
SoAlvin Y.HikamMuhammad. 1989. “Class in the Writings of Wallerstein and Thompson: Toward a Class Struggle Analysis.”Sociological Perspectives32: 453–468
28.
StolzmanJamesGambergHerbert. 1973. “Marxist Class Analysis versus Stratification Analysis as an General Approach to Social Inequality.”Berkeley Journal of Sociology78: 105–125
29.
SyzmanskiAlbert. 1972. “Trends in the American Class Structure.”Socialist Revolution10: 101–122
30.
TakakiRonald. 1983. Pau Hana: Plantation Life and Labor in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
31.
TherbornGoran. 1986. “Class Analysis: History and Defense.” Pp. 96–132 in The Sociology of Structure and Action, edited by HimmelstrandUlf. Newbury Park: Sage Publications
32.
ThompsonE. P.1978. “Eighteenth-Century English Society: Class Struggle Without Class?”Social History4: 133–165
33.
ThompsonE. P.1983. “Class Consciousness.” Pp. 114–142 in History and Class, edited by NealeR. S., Oxford: Basil Blackwell
34.
WrightErik. O.1976. “Class Boundary in Advanced Capitalist Societies.”New Left Review98: 3–41
35.
WrightErik. O.1985. Classes. London: Verso
36.
WrightErik. O.1989. “Rethinking, Once Again, the Concept of Class Structure.” Pp. 269–348 in The Debate on Classes, edited by WrightErik O., London: Verso
