This paper introduces the reader to this special issue. It briefly outlines some of the predicaments faced by those who practice critical theory in a social scientific context. It argues that the essence of critical theory lies in its method, and, in a stylized account, describes how that method works. The paper closes with a discussion of some of the pitfalls which critical theory encounters in its evolving dialogue with sociology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoTheodor. 1973. Negative Dialectics. New York: Seabury
2.
AntonioRobert J.1981. “Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: Its Origins and Developments in Hegel, Marx and Contemporary Thought.”British Journal of Sociology32: 330–345
3.
BrownJames. [1950] 1988. “Beech Creek: The Social Organization of an Isolated Kentucky Mountain Neighborhood.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University. Berea College Press (forthcoming)
4.
Buck-MorssSusan. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin and the Frankfurt Institute. New York: The Free Press
5.
HabermasJurgen. 1973. Legitimation Crisis. Translated by McCarthyThomas. Boston: Beacon
6.
HabermasJurgen. 1986. Autonomy and Solidarity, Interviews with Jurgen Habermas. Edited and with an Introduction by DewsPeter. London: Verso