Abstract
A review of sociologists' excuses for not developing laws or principles that are the equivalent to those in the natural sciences is undertaken. This review is placed in the context of the vision of sociology's early masters who believed that laws of social organization could be articulated. The failure of modern theorists to build on this vision over the last 50 years is highlighted by an examination of some of the basic principles of social organization that the early masters articulated. These principles, it is argued, constitute sociological laws that are equivalent to those in the natural sciences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
