Abstract
Increasing numbers of sociologists are showing interest in biosocial theories. We present three central criteria for a balanced biosocial theory, i.e., a theory which provides a balanced integration of both genetic and environmental determinants of behavior. Ethology and sociobiology do not possess the properties of balanced theories; and Type II errors make it unlikely that they will reject the key assumptions which make them unbalanced. There are at least four alternatives through which sociologists can pursue balanced biosocial theories and research. As sociologists expand and refine their discipline, it is only logical that balanced biosocial theories will be incorporated to guard against genetic and environmental extremes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
