Drawing on equity theory, this study examines the effect of spouses' relative incomes (wife's income/ husband's income) on wives' perceptions of the extent to which their husbands should share housekeeping labor. Multiple regression analysis revealed that spouses' relative income has an appreciable positive effect (wives become more egalitarian in their perceptions as their income becomes more equal to their husbands') which persists with controls for eleven variables thought to be relevant to the formation of sex-role expectations. This finding, which is consistent with the equity theory notion that actors expect differerences in outcomes to correspond with differences in inputs, suggests that equity considerations play an important role in shaping wives' expectations concerning the distribution of housekeeping labor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. S.1965“Inequity in social exchange,” pp. 267–299 in BerkowitzL. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Volume II. New York: Academic
2.
AdamsJ. S.FreedmanS.1976“Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography,” pp. 43–90 in BerkowitzL.WalsterE. (eds.) Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction. New York: Academic
3.
BalkwellC.BalswickJ.BalkwellJ. W.1978“On black and white family patterns in America: Their impact on the expressive aspect of sex-role socialization”. J. of Marriage and Family40 (November): 743–747
4.
BarthE.A.T.WatsonW. B.1967“Social stratification and the family in mass society”. Social Forces45 (March): 392–402
5.
BayerA.1975“Sexist students in American colleges: A descriptive note”. J. of Marriage and Family37 (May): 391–397
6.
BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr.AndersonB.CohenB. P.1972“Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status-value formulation,” pp. 119–146 in BergerJ. (eds.) Sociological Theories in Progress. Volume II. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
7.
BerheideC. W.BerkS. F.BerkR. A.1976“Household work in the suburbs: The job and its participants”. Pacific Soc. Rev.19 (October): 491–517
8.
BernardJ.1972The Future of Marriage. New York: Bantam
9.
BloodR. O.HamblinR. L.1958“The effects of the wife's employment on the family power structure”. Social Forces36 (May): 347–352
10.
BurchinalL. G.1964“The rural family of the future,” pp. 161–168 in CoppJ. H. (ed.) Our Changing Rural Society. Ames; IO. Iowa State Univ. Press
11.
BurrW. R.1971“An expansion and test of a role theory of marital satisfaction”. J. of Marriage and Family33 (May): 368–372
12.
DuncanO. D.1961“A socioeconomic index for all occupations,” pp. 109–138 in ReissA. J. (eds.) Occupations and Social Status. New York: Macmillan
13.
FerreeM. M.1976“Working class jobs: Housework and paid work as sources of satisfaction”. Social Problems23 (April): 431–441
14.
HawkinsJ. L.JohnsonK.1969“Perception of behavioral conformity, imputation of consensus, and marital satisfaction”. J. of Marriage and Family31 (August): 507–511
15.
HobartC. N.1958“Disillusionment in marriage and romanticism”. Marriage and Family Living20 (May): 156–162
16.
HolmstromL.1972The Two Career Family. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman
17.
HomansG. C.1961Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (also published in 1974)
18.
IchilovO.RubineckB.1977“The relationship between girls' attitudes concerning the family and their perception of the patterns existing in the family of origin”. J. of Marriage and Family39 (May): 417–422
KomarovskyM.1962Blue-Collar Marriage. New York: Vintage
21.
KotlarS. L.1965“Middle-class marital role perceptions and marital adjustment”. Soc. and Soccial Research49 (April): 283–293
22.
LeslieG. R.1973The Family in Social Context. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
23.
LevanthalG. S.1976“Fairness in social relationships,” pp. 211–239 in ThibautJ. W. (eds.) Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
StuckertR. P.1963“Role perception and marital satisfaction: A configurational approach”. Marriage and Family Living25 (November): 415–419
41.
TomehA. K.1979“Sex role orientation and structural correlates”. Soc. Q. 20 (Summer): 345–358
42.
VanekJ.1974“Time spent in housework”. Scientific Amer. 231 (November): 116–120
43.
VanfossenB. E.1977“Sexual stratification and sex-role socialization”. J. of Marriage and Family39 (August): 563–574
44.
WalkerK. E.1969“Homemaking still takes time,”J. of Home Economics61 (October): 621–624
45.
WalkerK. E.1973“Household work time; its implications for family decisions”. J. of Home Economics65 (October): 7–11
46.
WalsterE.BerscheidE.WalsterG. W.1973“New directions in equity research”. J. of Personality and Social Psychology25: 151–176
47.
WalsterE.WalsterG. W.BerscheidE.1978Equity Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
48.
WiegardE.1954Use of Time by Full-time and Part-time Homemakers in Relation to Home Management. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univ. Agricultural Experimental Station
49.
WilsonM.1929Use of Time by Oregon Farm Homemakers. Corvallis: Oregon State College Agricultural Station
