AbrahamsonMark1967The Professional in the Organization. New York: Rand McNally.
2.
American Men of Science–Physical and Biological Sciences Section. 1968New York: Jacques Cottell Press.
3.
AveryRobert1960“Enculturation in industrial research”. IRE Trans-Actions on Engineering Management7 (March): 22–26.
4.
Ben-DavidJ.1958“The professional role of the physician in bureaucratized medicine: A study in role conflict”. Human Relations11: 255–274.
5.
BennisWarren G.1955“The social scientist as research entrepreneur: A case study”. Social Problems3 (July): 44–49.
6.
BrehmJ. W.CohenA. R.1962Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: John Wiley.
7.
ClarkBurton R.1963“Faculty organization and authority,” pp. 37–51 in LunsfordTerry F. (ed.) The Study of Academic Administration. Boulder, Colorado: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
8.
EtzioniAmitai1969The Semi-Professionals and Their Organization. New York: Free Press.
9.
FestingerLeon1957A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Row, Peterson.
10.
GlaserBarney1963“The local-cosmopolitan scientist”. Amer. J. of Sociology69: 249–259.
11.
GoldnerFred H.RittiR. R.1967“Professionalization as career immobility”. Amer. J. of Sociology72 (March): 489–502.
12.
GouldnerAlvin1957“Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles”. Administrative Sci. Q. 2 (December): 281–306.
13.
HallRichard H.1968“Professionalization and bureaucratization”. Amer. Soc. Rev.33 (February): 92–104.
14.
HirschWalter1968Scientists in American Society. New York: Random House.
15.
HymanHerbert1955Survey Design and Analysis. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
16.
KaplanNorman1965“Professional Scientists in industry: An essay in review”. Social Problems13 (Summer): 88–97.
17.
KornhauserWilliam1962Scientists in Industry: Conflict and Accommodation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
18.
La PorteTodd1965“Conditions of strain and accommodation in industrial research organizations”. Administrative Sci. Q. 10 (June): 21–38.
19.
Le BoldWilliam K.1966“The engineer in industry and government”. J. of Engineering Education56 (March): 237–273.
20.
LuszkiMargaret1958Interdisciplinary Team Research Methods and Problems. New York: New York Univ. Press.
21.
MarcsonSimon1960The Scientists in American Industry: Some Organization Determinants in Manpower Utilization. New York: Harper Bros.
22.
MillerGeorge A.1967“Professionals in Bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers”. Amer. Soc. Rev.32 (October): 755–768.
23.
OrlansHarold1967“Ethical problems in the relations of research sponsors and investigators,” pp. 3–24 in SjobergGideon (ed.) Ethics, Politics and Social Research. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman.
24.
ReissmanLeonard1949“A study of role conceptions in bureaucracy”. Social Forces27 (March): 305–310.
25.
ShepardHerbert A.1958“The dual hierarchy in research”. Research Management1 (Autumn): 177–187.
26.
ShepherdClovis1961“Orientations of scientists and engineers”. Pacific Soc. Rev.4 (Fall): 79–83.
StraussAnselm L.RainwaterLee1962The Professional Scientist: A Study of the American Chemist. Chicago, Ill.: Aldine.
29.
VollmerHoward1965Work Activities and Attitudes of Scientists and Research Managers: Data From a National Survey. Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute.
30.
VollmerHoward1966“Entrepreneurship and professional productivity among research scientists,” pp. 276–282 in VollmerHoward M.MillsDonald L. (eds.) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
31.
WilenskyHarold L.1956Intellectuals in Labor Unions: Organizational Pressures on Professional Roles. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
32.
ZeiselHans1957Say It With Figures. New York: Harper & Row.