Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Photo elicitation has become an important method to produce data in qualitative research. There is quite an extensive literature indicating the benefits of photo elicitation in order to facilitate collaboration in meaning making between researcher and the interviewee. This article addresses dilemmas associated with using photo elicitation in a comparative research project focusing on kindergartens in Norway and in China. The article discusses dilemmas associated with the process of taking photos and selecting those to be used in the interview. Furthermore, the article reflects upon dilemmas in relation to positioning of the researcher, the interpreter and the kindergarten teachers in the interviews. Finally the dilemma of the agency of the pictures is discussed. The article argues for the importance of discussing these dilemmas specifically in cross-cultural research with presumably large cultural differences as China and Norway. Furthermore the article emphasises the importance of using both insider teachers and outsider teachers in interpretation of the photos in comparative research in order to disturb the taken for granted interpretations.

References

Alexander

R.J.

Broadfoot

Phillips

(1999) Learning from Comparing: New directions in comparative educational research. Oxford: Symposium.

Bakhtin

Holquist

Emerson

(1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Banks

(2007) Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Berger

(1972) Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.

Birkeland

Å.

(2012) Barnehagens vegger som danningsagenter, in Ødegaard

E.E.

(Ed.) Barnehagen som danningsarena, pp. 157–180. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Bresler

(2013) Seeing As ‘versus’ Seeing More: Cultivating connections in arts-based research, in Smilan

Miraglia

(Eds) Inquiry in Action: Paradigms, methodologies and perspectives in art education research. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

Cheng

(1998) Can Education Values be Borrowed? Looking into Cultural Differences, Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 11–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7302_1

Collier

(1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

Crossley

Watson

(2003) Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, context and difference. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203452745

10.

Dahlberg

Moss

(2005) Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

11.

Dewey

(1934) Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.

12.

Gadamer

H.G.

(2004) Truth and Method. London: Continuum.

13.

Gulløv

Højlund

(2003) Feltarbejde blandt børn: Metodologi og etik i etnografisk børneforskning. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.

14.

Harper

(2012) Visual Sociology: An introduction. London: Taylor & Francis.

15.

Heimer

Thøgersen

(2006) Doing Fieldwork in China. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.

16.

Hurworth

R.E.

(2008) Teaching Qualitative Research: Cases and issues. Rotterdam: Sense.

17.

Lapenta

(2011) Some Theoretical and Methodological Views on Photo-elicitation, in Margolis

Pauwels

(Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

18.

Margolis

Pauwels

(Eds) (2011) The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

19.

Moss

(2007) Meetings across the Paradigmatic Divide, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 229–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00325.x

20.

Ødegaard

E.E.

(2012a) Barnehagen som danningsarena. Bergen: Fagbokforl.

21.

Ødegaard

E.E.

(2012b). Meningsskaping i bruk av artefakter, in Ødegaard

E.E.

(Ed.) Barnehagen som danningsarena, pp. 91–112. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

22.

Pink

(2007) Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London: Sage.

23.

Rose

(2012) Visual Methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Los Angeles: Sage.

24.

Spodek

Saracho

O.N.

(2005) International Perspectives on Research in Early Childhood Education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

25.

Tilley

(2006) Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage.

26.

Tobin

(2005) Quality in Early Childhood Education: An anthropologist's perspective, Early Education and Development, 16(4), 421–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1604_3

27.

Tobin

J.J.

Hsueh

Karasawa

(2009) Preschool in Three Cultures Revisited: China, Japan and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226805054.001.0001

28.

Tobin

J.J.

D.Y.H.

Davidson

D.H.

(1989) Preschool in Three Cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

29.

Wang

J.C.S.

(2007) John Dewey in China: To teach and to learn. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

30.

Winther-Jensen

(2004) Komparativ pædagogik: Faglig tradition og global udfordring. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

31.

Wollons

(2000) Kindergartens and Cultures: The global diffusion of an idea. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Research Dilemmas Associated with Photo Elicitation in Comparative Early Childhood Education Research

Abstract

References