Testing to Rank,Testing to Learn,Testing to Improve: An Introduction and Overview

Abstract

References

ASER (2013) Annual Status of Education Report. Delhi: ASER. http://www.asercentre.org/

Ball

(2008) The Education Debate. London: Routledge.

Barber

(2012) Foreword, in The Learning Curve: lessons in country performance in education. http://thelearningcurve.pearson.com/about

Bieber

& Martens

(2011) The OECD PISA Study as a Soft Power in Education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US, European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01462.x

Bonal

(2003) The Neoliberal Educational Agenda and the Legitimation Crisis: old and new state strategies, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 159–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425690301897

Breakspear

(2012) The Policy Impact of PISA: an exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Paper, 71. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Brenner

(2001) The Limits to Scale? Methodological Reflections On Scalar Structuration, Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959

Carnoy

& Rothstein

(2013) What Do International Tests Really Show About U.S. Student Performance? Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Clarke

Gewirtz

& McLaughlin

(Eds) (2000) New Managerialism, New Welfare? London: Sage.

10.

Dale

(2001) Constructing a Long Spoon for Comparative Education: charting the career of the ‘New Zealand model’, Comparative Education, 37(4), 493–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050060120091274

11.

Darling-Hammond

(2010) What We Can Learn from Finland's Successful School Reform, NEA Today. http://www.nea.org/home/40991.htm

12.

Dronkers

& de Heus

(2013) Immigrant Children's Academic Performance: the influence of origin, destination and community, in Meyer

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

13.

Elmore

(1996) Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice, Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 1–26.

14.

Emerson

& Chabbott

(2003) Understanding Others; Educating Ourselves: getting more from international comparisons in education. Washington DC: National Research Council.

15.

Engel

L.C.

(2012) Europe's Quest for Quality: transnational policy steering through hard measures. Paper presented at the Globalizing Education in the 21st Century: The Bologna Reform and Beyond conference, University of Illinois.

16.

Ertl

(2006) Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany, Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320

17.

Commission

European

(2013) European Education Benchmarks. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/benchmarks_en.htm

18.

Feuer

M.J.

(2012) Validity Issues in International Large-scale Assessments: truth and consequences. Paper presented at Educational Testing Service/Columbia University Conference, 28–29 March 2011, New York.

19.

Gorard

(2001) International Comparisons of School Effectiveness: the second component of the ‘crisis account’ in England? Comparative Education, 37(3), 279–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050060120067785

20.

Grek

(2009) Governing by Numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe, Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669

21.

Haahr

J.H.

with Nielsen

T.K.

Hansen

M.E.

& Jakobsen

S.T.

(2005) Explaining Student Performance: evidence from the international PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS surveys. Danish Technological Institute. http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/doc/basic_en.pdf

22.

Hood

(1991) A Public Management for All Seasons, Public Administration, 69, 3–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

23.

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (n.d.) Countries participating: TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/pirls-timss.html.

24.

Kamens

(2013) Globalization and the Emergence of an Audit Culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets, in Meyer

H.D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

25.

Kamens

D.H.

& Benavot

(2011) Trends in Assessment, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300.

26.

Kamens

D.H.

& McNeely

(2010) Globalization and the Growth of International Educational Testing and National Assessment, Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/648471

27.

Lillis

K.M.

(1992). Improving Basic Education: preconditions for successful inspection and supervision – implications for training. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.

28.

Lyotard

J.F.

(1984) The Postmodern Condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

29.

Marginson

(1997) Steering from a Distance: Power Relations in Australian Higher Education, Higher Education, 34(1), 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003082922199

30.

Martens

& Niemann

(2010) Governance by Comparison: how ratings and rankings impact national policy-making in education. Transtate Working Papers, 139). Bremen: Sn597, Staatlichkeit im Wandel.

31.

Meyer

H.D.

& Benavot

(2013) PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

32.

Mirazchiyski

(2013) Providing School-level Reports from International Large-scale Assessments: methodological considerations, limitations, and possible solutions. Hamburg: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

33.

Mullis

Martin

Foy

& Arora

(2012) TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

34.

Mullis

Martin

Ruddock

O'Sullivan

& Preuschoff

(2009) TIMSS 2011 Assessment Frameworks. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

35.

National Center on Education and the Economy (n.d.) Center on International Education Benchmarking: learning from the world's high performing education systems. http://www.ncee.org/programs-affiliates/center-on-international-education-benchmarking/

36.

Noah

H.J.

& Eckstein

M.A.

(1969) Toward a Science of Comparative Education. New York: Macmillan.

37.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (n.d.) PISA 2012 participants. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/participatingcountrieseconomies/pisa2012participants.htm

38.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) PISA 2009 at a Glance. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46660259.pdf

39.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) How Your School Compares Internationally: OECD test for schools (based on PISA) pilot trial. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-basedtestforschools/OECD%20Test%20for%20Schools%20-%20Herndon%20High%20School.pdf

40.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013a) Education Today 2013: the OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.

41.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013b) PISA-based Test for Schools. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-basedtestforschools/

42.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013c) PISA for Development. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisafordevelopment/

43.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013d) PISA in Focus. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisainfocus/

44.

Papanastasiou

Plomp

& Papanastasiou

E.C.

(2011) IEA 1958-2008: 50 years of experiences and memories. Nicosia, Cyprus: Cultural Center of the Kykkos Monastery.

45.

Pereyra

Kotthoff

H.G.

& Cowen

(2011) PISA Under Examination: changing knowledge, changing tests and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

46.

Phillips

& Ochs

(2003) Processes of Policy Borrowing in Education: some explanatory and analytical devices, Comparative Education, 49(4), 451–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305006032000162020

47.

Popkewitz

(2011) Numbers, Standardizing Conduct, and the Alchemy of School Subjects, in Pereyra

M.A.

Kotthoff

H.G.

& Cowen

(Eds) PISA Under Examination: changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

48.

Porter

R.W.

& Hicks

(1997) Knowledge Utilization and the Process of Policy Formation: towards a framework for action, in Chapman

D.W.

Mahlck

L.A.

& Smulders

A.E.M.

(Eds) From Planning to Action: government initiatives for improving school-level practice, pp. 32–66. Oxford: Pergamon.

49.

Postlethwaite

N.T.

(1999) International Studies of Educational Achievement: methodological issues. Hong Kong: Comparative Educational Research Centre.

50.

Power

(1997) The Audit Society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

51.

Ritzen

(2012) International Large-scale Assessments as Change Agents, in von Davier

Gonzalez

Kirsch

& Yamamoto

(Eds) The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments: perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. New York: Springer

52.

Rizvi

& Lingard

(2009) Globalizing Education Policy. London, Routledge.

53.

Rotberg

I.C.

(2010) Balancing Change and Tradition in Global Education Reform (2nd edn). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

54.

Rutkowski

Gonzalez

Joncas

& von Davier

(2010) International Large-scale Assessment Data: issues in secondary analysis and reporting, Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10363170

55.

Sadler

(1900) How Far Can We Learn Anything of Practical Value from the Study of Foreign Systems of Education? Reprinted in 1964, Comparative Education Review, 7, 307–314.

56.

Sahlberg

(2011) Finnish Lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press.

57.

Sielatycki

(2011) Poland: successes and challenges, educational reforms. Paper presented at the 14th OECD Japan Seminar ‘Strong Performers, Successful Reformers in Education’. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/39/48357781.ppt

58.

Simola

(2005) The Finnish Miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education, Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810

59.

Stewart

(2013) PISA's tests could get curiouser and curiouser, Times Education Supplement, 21 June. http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6340761

60.

Takayama

(2007) A Nation at Risk Crosses the Pacific: transnational borrowing of the U.S. crisis discourse in the debate on education reform in Japan, Comparative Education Review, 51(4), 423–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/520864

61.

Takayama

(2009) Politics of Externalization in Reflexive Times: reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through ‘Finnish PISA success’, Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 51–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/644838

62.

Teodoro

& Estrela

(2010) Curriculum Policy in Portugal (1995–2007): global agendas and regional and national reconfigurations, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(5), 621–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220271003735728

63.

Tolofari

(2005) New Public Management and Education, Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11

64.

Tröhler

(2013) The OECD and Cold War Culture: thinking historically about PISA, in Meyer

H.D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

65.

Tucker

M.S.

(2011) Surpassing Shanghai: an agenda for American education built on the world's leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

66.

US Department of Education (2012) Succeeding Globally through International Education and Engagement. Washington, DC: Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/internationaled/international-strategy-2012-16.pdf

67.

Välijärvi

Kupari

Linnakylä

(2002) The Finnish Success in PISA – and some reasons behind it: PISA 2000. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä. https://ktl.jyu.fi/img/portal/8302/PISA_2003_screen.pdf

68.

von Davier

Gonzalez

Kirsch

& Yamamoto

(2013) The Role of International Large-scale Assessments: perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4629-9

69.

Wagner

(2011) Smaller, Quicker, Cheaper: improving learning assessments for developing countries. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.

70.

Williams

& Cummings

W.K.

(2005) Policy-making for Education Reform in Developing Countries: contexts and processes. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

71.

Willms

J.D.

(2010) School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes, Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1008–1037.

72.

Wiseman

A.W.

(2010) The Impact of International Achievement Studies on National Education Policy. International Perspectives on Education and Society Series, Vol. 13. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

73.

Wiseman

A.W.

(2013) Policy Responses to PISA in Comparative Perspective, in Meyer

H.D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

74.

Bank

World

(2013) World Bank Classification of Country and Lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups