The challenge of student engagement has been recognised as a serious issue in both Australian and Canadian education. This empirical and qualitative study seeks to understand the experiences of two groups of students; the first beginning their high school years and the second reflecting back on successful university and less than successful high school experiences. Students are traditionally objectified and omitted from the discourse on student engagement. Providing a forum for student voice in both continents, we compare and contrast the various and sometimes contested understandings of what an authentic or generative student engagement might mean for both school leadership and classroom practice. Adopting a critical pedagogical perspective, this descriptive article seeks to compare answers to the following question: How is engagement defined and enacted by students within these different environments?
References
1.
AndersonG.L.HerrK. (1993) The Micro-politics of Students' Voices: Moving from diversity of bodies to diversity of voices in schools, in MarshallC. (Ed.) The New Politics of Race and Gender, 58–68. Washington: Falmer Press.
2.
AppleM. (1993) Official Knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
3.
AppleM.BeaneJ. (1999) Democratic Schools: Lessons from the chalk face. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
ArmstrongD.McMahonB. (2002) Engaged Pedagogy: Valuing the strengths of students on the margins, Journal of Thought, 37(1), 53–66.
5.
BooksS. (1998) Speaking of and against Youth. In BooksS. (Ed.) Invisible Children in the Society and in the Schools, 183–199. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BourdieuP.WacquantL.J.D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ChávezR.C.O'DonnellJ. (1998) Speaking the Unpleasant: The politics of (non)engagement in the multicultural education terrain. Albany: State University of New York Press.
DeiG. (2003) Schooling and the Dilemma of Youth Disengagement, McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 241.
10.
DeiG.HolmesL.MazzucaJ.McIsaacE.CampbellR. (1997) Reconstructing 'Drop-Out': A critical ethnography of the dynamics of Black students' disengagement from school. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11.
EmmerE.T.GerwelsM.C. (2002) Cooperative Learning in Elementary Classrooms: Teaching practices and lesson characteristics, The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499716
FinnJ.D. (1989) Withdrawing from School, Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
14.
FredricksJ.BlumenfeldP.ParisA. (2004) School Engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence, Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
15.
FredricksJ.BlumenfeldP.FriedelJ.ParisA. (2003) School Engagement. Paper presented at the Indicators of Positive Development Conference, Washington DC, 11–13 March.
16.
FreireP. (1998) Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
FullartonS. (2002) Student Engagement with School: Individual and school-level influences (No. 27, Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report). Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
18.
GaleT. (2006) How Did We Ever Arrive at the Conclusion that Teachers are the Problem? A Critical Reading in the Discourses of Australian Schooling, in DoeckeB.HowieM.SawyerW. (Eds) ‘Only Connect…’: English teaching, schooling, and democracy. Kent Town: AATE & Wakefield Press.
19.
GaleT.DensmoreK. (2000) Just Schooling: Explorations in the cultural politics of teaching. London: Open University Press.
20.
GillbornD.YoudellD. (2000) Rationing Education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
21.
GirouxH.A. (1994) Education in the Age of Slackers, International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 210–215.
22.
GitlinA.RussellR. (1994) Alternative Methodologies and the Research Context, in GitlinA. (Ed.) Power and Method: Political activism and educational research, 181–202. New York: Routledge.
23.
GlassR. (2005) What is Democratic Education? in HareW.PortelliJ. (Eds) Key Questions for Educators, 83–86. Halifax, NS: EdPhil.
24.
GoodmanJ. (1992) Elementary Schooling for Critical Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
25.
HabermanM. (1991) The Pedagogy of Poverty versus Good Teaching, Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290.
26.
HattieJ. (2003) Teachers Make a Difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the ACER Research Conference, Carlton Crest Hotel, Melbourne Australia, 19–21 October.
27.
HooksB. (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
28.
HooksB. (2003) Teaching Community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.
29.
KanpolB. (1997) Issues and Trends in Critical Pedagogy. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
30.
KingA. (2004) Double Cohort Study: Phase 3 report. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Education.
31.
LeeE. (2002) Still at the Bottom. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for Studies in Education Conference, Toronto, May.
32.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2000) The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Conditions and Student Engagement with School, Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
33.
LingardB. (2006) Pedagogies of Indifference: Research policy and practice. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide University, 27–30 November.
34.
LingardB.LadwigJ.MillsM. (2001) Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: Final report, vol. 1. Brisbane: Report prepared for Education Queensland by the School of Education, The University of Queensland.
35.
LongM. (2007) How Young People are Faring. Glebe: Monash University – ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training (CEET) Dusseldorp Skills Forum.
36.
LukeA. (1996) Text and Discourse in Education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis, Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48.
37.
LuseP.L. (2002) Speedwriting: A teaching strategy for active student engagement, The Reading Teacher, 56(1), 20.
McFaddenM.MunnsG. (2002) Student Engagement and the Social Relations of Pedagogy, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000015409
40.
McMahonB. (2002) Beyond a Discourse of Deficit: The role of educational administrators in conceptions of risk and resilience, Values in Educational Leadership Conference (VEEA), Toronto, ON, October 8–11.
41.
McMahonB. (2003) Putting the Elephant in the Refrigerator: Student engagement, critical pedagogy and antiracist education, McGill Journal of Educational Research, 38(2), 257–273.
42.
McMahonB. (2004) Small Steps and Quiet Circles: Student transformations through the enactment of resilience processes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
43.
McMahonB.J. (2007) (Im)moral Praxis: Configuring theory and practice of students at risk, International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 11(2).
44.
McMahonB.J.ArmstrongD.E. (2003) Racism, Resistance, Resilience: The 3Rs of educating Caribbean students in a Canadian context, in BastickT.EzenneA. (Eds) Teaching Caribbean Students: Research on social issues in the Caribbean and abroad, 249–284. Kingston: University of the West Indies.
45.
McMahonB.J.PortelliJ. P. (2004) Engagement for What? Beyond Popular Discourses of Student Engagement, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/lpos.3.1.59.27841
46.
MitraD. (2003) Student Voice in School Reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships, McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 279–304.
47.
MitraD. (2005) Adults Advising Youth: Leading while getting out of the way, Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 520–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269620
48.
MitraD. (2006) Youth as a Bridge between Home and School: Comparing student voice and parent involvement as strategies for change, Education and Urban Society, 38(4), 455–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124506287911
49.
MoodleyK.A. (1992) Ethnicity, Power, Politics and Minority Education, in MoodleyK.A. (Ed.) Beyond Multicultural Education: International perspectives, 79–93. Calgary: Detselig.
50.
NewmannF. (1986) Priorities for the Future: Towards a common agenda, Social Education, 50, 240–250.
NewmannF.M.BrykA.S.NagaokaJ.K. (2001) Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict or coexistence?Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
53.
NewmannF.WehlageG.LambornS. (1992) The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement, in NewmannF. (Ed.) Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, 11–39. New York: Teachers' College Press.
PortelliJ.P.VibertA. (2001) Beyond Common Educational Standards: Towards a curriculum of life, in PortelliJ.P.SolomonR.P. (Eds) The Erosion of Democracy in Education: From critique to possibilities, 63–82. Calgary: Detselig.
57.
QuinnD.M. (2002) The Impact of Principal Leadership Behaviors on Instructional Practice and Student Engagement, Journal of Educational Administration, 40(4/5), 447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440294
58.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968) Pygmalion in the Classroom; teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
59.
RoweK.J. (2004) The Importance of Teaching: Ensuring better schooling by building teacher capacities that maximize the quality of teaching and learning provision – implications of findings from the international and Australian evidence-based research. Paper presented at the Making Schools Better conference: A summit conference on the performance, management and funding of Australian schools, University of Melbourne, 26–27 August.
60.
RudduckJ.DemetriouH. (2003) Student Perspectives and Teacher Practices: The transformative potential, McGill Journal of Education, 38, 274–288.
61.
RuddockJ.FlutterJ. (2000) Pupil Participation and Pupil Perspective: ‘carving a new order of experience’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057640050005780
62.
SarraC. (2003) Young and Black and Deadly: Strategies for improving outcomes for indigenous students. Deakin West, ACT: Australian College of Educators.
63.
SchlechtyP.C. (2002) Working on the Work: An action plan for teachers, principals, and superintendents, 1st edn.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SeidmanI. (1998) Interviewing as Qualitative Research, 2nd edn.New York: Teachers College Press.
65.
ShorI. (1992) Empowering Education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
ShorI. (1996) When Students have Power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
SingM.LukeA. (1996) Introduction, in BernsteinB. (Ed.) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, research, critique, xiv, 216. London: Taylor & Francis.
68.
SmithW.Butler-KisberL.LaRocqueL.PortelliJ.ShieldsC.SparkesC.VibertA. (1998) Student Engagement in Learning and Life: National project report. Montreal, QC: Office of Research on Educational Policy, McGill University.
69.
SolomonR.P. (1996) Creating an Opportunity Structure for Blacks and Other Teachers of Colour, in BrathwaiteK.S.JamesC.E. (Eds) Educating African Canadians, 216–133. Toronto: James Lorimer & Co.
70.
SmithW.Butler-KisberL.LaRoqueL. (2001) Student Engagement in Learning and School Life. National Project Report, vol. 1. Montreal: Faculty of Education, McGill University.
71.
TaylorA. (2001) The Politics of Educational Reform in Alberta. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
72.
TeeseR.PoleselJ. (2003) Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Publishing.
73.
TeeseR.LambS.Duru-BellatM.HelmeS. (2007) International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
74.
VibertA.B.ShieldsC. (2003) Approaches to Student Engagement: Does ideology matter?McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 221–240.
75.
VibertA.PortelliJ.ShieldsC.LaRoqueL. (2002) Critical Practice in Elementary Schools: Voice, community, and a curriculum of life, Journal of Educational Change, 3, 93–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016555028133
76.
ZyngierD. (2003) ‘Hanging Out – Hanging On – Hanging In’ or is it ‘Elect Out, Drift Out and Driven Out.’ What Works for At-risk Students – how a connected or generative pedagogy improves student educational outcomes for all but in particular for marginalised students. Paper presented at the Australian Curriculum Studies Association Biennial National Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.
77.
ZyngierD. (2005) Listening to Teachers – listening to students. Substantive Conversations about Resistance, Empowerment and Engagement. Translation of Research into Practice (Praxis). Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions, Paramatta, NSW, 27 November-1 December.
78.
ZyngierD. (2007) Listening to Teachers – listening to students: Substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement, Teachers and Teaching, 13(4), 327–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540600701391903
79.
ZyngierD. (2008) (Re)Conceptualising Student Engagement: Doing education not doing time, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1765–1776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004
80.
ZyngierD.GaleT. (2003) Non-systemic and Non-traditional Educational Programs in FMP Secondary Schools: Final report. Frankston: Frankston Mornington Peninsula Local Learning Employment Network.
81.
ZyngierD.MayW. (2004) Key-Makers: Advancing student engagement through changed teaching practice. Final Report. Frankston: Monash University & Frankston Mornington Peninsula Local Learning Network.
