In the United States, charter schools have been proclaimed as the potential solution for a host of problems for inner-city education, particularly as a cure-all for marginal achievement scores on high-stakes standardized testing. Several US states and cities (most prominently Texas, New York, Atlanta and Washington, DC) have embraced this neo-liberal vision of educational reform as a ‘miracle’ panacea and injected business-derived principles into schools to much fanfare and few authentic positive results. This article focuses on the rhetoric of market-driven solutions for school reform as exemplified in Davis Guggenheim's 2010 documentary Waiting for ‘Superman’. Contextualizing the film within a milieu of recent reform and ‘miracle’ solutions, the article attempts to highlight the inherent narrative character of the educational reform movement in the United States and its perpetual willingness to ignore previous structural failures in search of new solutions which typically mirror previous innovations in their fictive type.
References
1.
AnagnostopoulosD. (2000) Raising Standards, Failing Students: A case study of merit promotion in two Chicago high schools. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
2.
AnagnostopoulosD. (2003) Testing and Student Engagement with Literature in Urban Classrooms: A multi-layered perspective, Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 177–212.
3.
AppleM.W. (1980) The Other Side of the Hidden Curriculum: Correspondence theories and the labor process, Journal of Education, 162(1), 50–51.
4.
AppleM.W. (1995) Education and Power, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
5.
AppleM.W. (2000) Official Knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
6.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
ColesG. (2007) Forging ‘Facts’ to Fit an Explanation: How to make reading research support skills-emphasis instruction, in LarsonJ. (Ed.) Literacy as Snake Oil: Beyond the quick fix, 27–48. New York: Peter Lang.
10.
CooperR.JordanW.J. (2005) Cultural Issues in Comprehensive School Reform, in FasholaO.S. (Ed.) Educating African American Males, 1–18. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
FergusenR.F. (2005) Teachers' Perceptions and Expectations and the Black–White Test Score Gap, in FasholaO.S. (Ed.) Educating African American Males, 79–128. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
12.
GattoL.A. (2007) Success Guaranteed Literacy Programs: I don't buy it! In LarsonJ. (Ed.) Literacy as Snake Oil: Beyond the quick fix, 73–90. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
GibbsJ.T., (Ed.) (1988) Young, Black, and Male in America: An endangered species. Dover, MA: Auburn House.
14.
GirouxH. (1994) Disturbing Pleasures: Learning popular culture. New York: Routledge.
15.
GoddardR. (2009) Not Fit for Purpose: The national strategies for literacy considered as an endeavour of government, Power and Education, 1(1), 30–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/power.2009.1.1.30.
16.
GrissmerD.FlanaganA.WilliamsonS. (1998) Why Did the Black–White Test Score Gap Narrow in the 1970s and 1980s? In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds) The Black–White Test Score Gap, 401–427. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
HallS. (1988) The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the theorists, in NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 35–57. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
18.
HallS.JacquesM. (1983) Introduction, in HallS.JacquesM. (Eds) The Politics of Thatcherism, 9–16. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
19.
HaneyW. (2000) The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/.
20.
HeiligJ.V.Darling-HammondL. (2008) Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110.
21.
HopkinsR. (1997) Educating Black Males: Critical lessons in schooling, community and power. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
HurshD. (2007) Exacerbating Inequality: The failed promise of No Child Left Behind, Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 295–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13613320701503264.
23.
IrvineJ.J. (1990) Black Students and School: Policies, practices and prescriptions. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
24.
JencksC.PhillipsM., (Eds) (1998) The Black–White Test Score Gap. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
25.
KleinS.P.HamiltonL.S.McCaffreyD.F.StecherB.M. (2000) What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/440/.
26.
KozolJ. (2006a) Confections of Apartheid Continue in our Schools, Education Digest, 71(6), 4–22.
27.
KozolJ. (2006b) Success for All: Trying to make an end run around inequality and segregation, Phi Delta Kappan, 87(8), 624–626.
28.
LarsonJ. (2007) In Sheep's Clothing: Uncovering the wolf, in LarsonJ. (Ed.) Literacy as Snake Oil: Beyond the quick fix, 1–7. New York: Peter Lang.
29.
LeeC. (2004) Racial Segregation and Educational Outcomes in Metropolitan Boston. Boston: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
30.
LeeJ. (2006) Tracking Achievement Gaps and Assessing the Impact of NCLB on the Gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and math outcomes trends. Boston: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
31.
LilliardD.DeCiccaP. (2001) Higher Standards, More Dropouts? Evidence within and across Time, Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 459–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272–7757(00)00022–4.
32.
McNeilL. (2000) Contradictions of School Reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
33.
National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching Children to Read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
34.
PoliteV.C.DavisJ.E. (1999) African American Males in School and Society: Practices and policies for effective education. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2003) Learning for Tomorrow's World: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: PISA.
36.
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2006) PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: PISA.
37.
RoderickM. (2005) What's Happening to the Boys? Early High School Experiences and School Outcomes among African American Male Adolescents in Chicago, in FasholaO.S. (Ed.) Educating African American Males, 151–227. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
SaulJ.R. (1995) The Unconscious Civilization. Toronto, Ontario: Free Press.
39.
ThernstromA.ThernstromS. (2003) No Excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (1995) The Condition of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
41.
ViaderoD. (2008) Black–White Gap Widens Faster for High Achievers, Education Week, 27(33).
42.
Waiting for ‘Superman’ (2010a) Dir. GuggenheimD., prod. ChilcottL., Los Angeles: Paramount Vantage.
