There is a demand for the integration of global learning/diversity across the curriculum. A series of cross-cultural assignments was created to facilitate global learning in two social psychology classes, one in Egypt, and one in the USA. In these assignments, students collected data and applied course concepts to real-life problems, then discussed their work on a Facebook page. A survey at the end of the semester found that students reported a greater appreciation for diversity, a decline in prejudice, and a new recognition of cultural similarities. Students also felt that their cross-cultural collaboration had helped them better understand and think more deeply about course concepts. Considerations for using online platforms as a global learning tool are discussed.
BarczykC. C., & DuncanD. G. (2013). Facebook in higher education courses: An analysis of students' attitudes, community of practice, and classroom community. International Business and Management, 6, 1–11.
3.
BuskistW.ZuckermanC., & BuslerJ. (2012). Introduction to the special issue. Globalization and the teaching of psychology: A call to action. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11, 306–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.3.306
4.
ChiaR. C.PoeE., & WuenschK. L. (2009). Change after taking a virtual global understanding course. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 75–79.
5.
EpplerM. A., & CavanaughS. A. (2012). Learning from peers around the globe without leaving campus. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11, 370–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.3.370
6.
GibsonK. L.RimmingtonG. M., & Landwehr-BrownM. (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30, 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783190701836270
7.
HillG. W. (2000). Incorporating a cross-cultural perspective in the undergraduate psychology curriculum: An interview with David Matsumoto. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 71–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2701_14
8.
HovlandK. (2009). Global learning: What is it? Who is responsible for it?Peer Review, 11(4), 4–7.
9.
KakaiH. (2000). The use of cross-cultural studies and experiences as a way of fostering critical thinking dispositions among college students. Journal of General Education, 49, 110–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jge.2000.0016
10.
KimH., & MarkusH. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
11.
KirkwoodT. F. (2001). Our global age requires global education: Clarifying definitional ambiguities. The Social Studies, 92, 10–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00377990109603969
12.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington: Association of American Colleges & Universities.
13.
LampeC.DongheeY. W.VitakJ.EllisonN. B., & WalshR. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 329–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9115-y
14.
MaherJ. M. & HoonC. H. (2008). Gender, space and discourse across borders: Talking gender in cyberspace. Feminist Teacher, 18, 202–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ftr.0.0016
MyersD. (2012). Exploring social psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America's Promise. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
PattersonL. M.CarrilloP. B., & SalinasR. S. (2012). Lessons from a global learning virtual classroom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16, 182–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315311398665
RussellD. (1982). The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137–1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1137
