This qualitative study of understandings of critical thinking in higher education aimed to identify themes that could help to demystify critical thinking and inform its more explicit incorporation in the psychology curriculum. Data collected from focus groups with 26 undergraduate psychology students and individual semistructured interviews with 4 psychology lecturers were examined using thematic analysis. The same key themes were identified from both student and lecturer data: ‘vague beginnings’, ‘conceptualizations’, ‘development and transitions’, and ‘learning strategies’. Both students and lecturers described critical thinking as implicit knowledge that develops through social interactions. The findings indicate the importance of explicit discussion about critical thinking, and could be used to inform the design and delivery of instructional methods to promote critical thinking.
References
1.
AbramiP. C.BernardR. M.BorokhovskiE.WadeA.SurkesM. A.TamimR., & ZhangD. A. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage one meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084
ElanderJ.HarringtonK.NortonL.RobinsonH., & ReddyP. (2006). Complex skills and academic writing: A review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 71–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262379
7.
FacioneP. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. (ERIC document ED 315-423).
8.
GarsideC. (1996). Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45, 212–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379050
9.
HalpernD. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
HalpernD. F. (2007). The nature and nurture of critical thinking. In SternbergR. J.RoedigerH. L., & HalpernD. F.Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HarringtonK.NortonL.ElanderJ.LusherJ.AiyegbayoO.PittE.RobinsonH., & ReddyP. (2006). Using core assessment criteria to improve essay writing. In BryanC. & CleggK. (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 110–119). London: Routledge.
13.
HalxM. D., & ReyboldL. E. (2005). A pedagogy of force: Faculty perspectives of critical thinking capacity in undergraduate students. Journal of General Education, 54, 293–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jge.2006.0009
14.
JanesickV. J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379–399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MeltzoffJ. (1998). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
SáW. C.WestR. F., & StanovichK. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497
18.
SmithJ. A. & OsbornM. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A., Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage.
19.
TintoV. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599–623. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2959965
20.
WilligC. (2008). Introducing qualitative research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: McGare Hill/Open University Press.
