American undergraduate psychology students' (N = 438) beliefs about the scientific nature of the discipline were assessed as a function of their year in college (first to fourth year) and academic status in psychology (a comprehensive, limited, or minimal program of study in psychology). Students completed the Psychology as a Science (PAS) questionnaire, in which they evaluated 15 Likert-type statements about scientific psychology. There was a main effect of year in college and academic status, suggesting that those who are academically advanced and committed to a comprehensive study of psychology had a stronger belief that psychology is a science. The results are discussed in terms of the process of conceptual change by which students overcome their misconceptions about psychology as a science.
References
1.
AmselE.JohnstonA.AlvaradoE.KetteringJ.RankinR., & WardM. (2009). The effect of perspective on misconceptions in psychology: A test of conceptual change theory. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 6, 289–295.
2.
AmselE.SavoieD.DeakG., & ClarkM. (1991). Preschoolers' understanding of gravity. In HammondK. J. & GentnerD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 600–605). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
BennettJ. (1991). How to read minds in behavior: A suggestion from a philosopher. In WhitenA. (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 97–108). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
4.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.
ChiM. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In VosniadouS. (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York: Routledge.
7.
D'AndradeR. G. (1987). A folk model of the mind. In HollandD. & QuinnN. (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 112–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DriverR. (1983). The pupil as scientist?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
9.
DuitR. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
10.
FriedrichJ. (1996). Assessing students' perceptions of psychology as a science: Validation of a self-report measure. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 6–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2301_1
KowalskiP., & TaylorA. K. (2006). Ability and critical thinking as predictors of change in students' psychological misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 297–303.
15.
KowalskiP., & TaylorA. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 153–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986280902959986
16.
LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.RuscioJ., & BeyersteinB. L. (2009). Fifty great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
LimonM., & MasonL. (Eds.) (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
18.
McCloskeyM. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In GentnerD. & StevensA. (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 289–324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCutcheonL. E.AppersonJ. M.HansonE., & WynnV. (1992). Relationships among critical thinking skills, academic achievement, and misconceptions about psychology. Psychological Reports, 71, 635–639. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.71.6.635-639
21.
MercerJ. (2010). Child development: Myths and misunderstandings. New York: Sage.
22.
MillerR. L.WozniakW. J.RustM. R.MillerB. R., & SlezakJ. (1996). Counterattitudinal advocacy as a means of enhancing instructional effectiveness: How to teach students what they do not want to know. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 215–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2304_2
PosnerG. J.StrikeK. A.HewsonP. W., & GertzogW. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
ReinerM.SlottaJ. D.ChiM. T. H., & ResnickL. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01
28.
SelmanR.KrupaM.StoneC., & JacquetteD. (1982). Concrete operational thought and the emergence of the concept of unseen force in children's theories of electromagnetism and gravity. Science Education, 66, 181–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660205
29.
SlottaJ. D., & ChiM. T. H. (2006). The impact of ontology training on conceptual change: Helping students understand the challenging topics in science. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 261–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2402_3
30.
SmithC.CareyS., & WiserM. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21, 177–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
31.
StrikeK. A., & PosnerG. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In DuschlR. A. & HamiltonR. J. (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York: State University of New York.
32.
TaylorA. K., & KowalskiP. (2004). Naive psychological science: The prevalence, strength, and sources of misconceptions. Psychological Record, 54, 15–25.
33.
ThompsonR. A., & ZamboangaB. L. (2004). Academic aptitude and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in Introduction to Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 778–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.778
34.
VosniadouS. (Ed.) (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
