The OCR AS Level Examination as a Means of Assessing the Critical Thinking Skills of Undergraduate Students: A Pilot Study

Abstract

With the advent of benchmark statements (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education [QAA], 2002), psychology undergraduate degree courses in the UK are now required both to develop and assess the critical thinking skills of their students. The study reported here takes a pragmatic view of problems associated with the lack of a consensual definition of critical thinking by adopting a measure that has been implicitly endorsed by the educational establishment in the UK. The multiple choice component of the Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (OCR) AS level critical thinking examination was completed by 176 students. The results showed that the measure had a high level of internal reliability and was consistently related to performance on traditional measures of academic achievement. It is suggested that the measure is reliable enough to be used in further research.

References

Baron-Cohen

(2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. London: Basic Books.

Cole

(1997). The ETS gender study: How females and males perform in educational settings. Princeton, NJ: ETS Technical Report.

Engle

R. W.

Tuholski

S. W.

Laughlin

J. E.

Conway

A. R. A.

(1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

Ennis

R. H.

(1995). Critical thinking. New York: Prentice Hall.

Facione

P. A.

(1990). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test and manual. San Diego, CA: California Academic Press.

Fischer

S. C.

Spiker

V. A.

(2000). A framework for critical thinking research and training. Report prepared for the US Army Research Institute. Santa Barbara, California: Anacapa Sciences Inc.

Fisher

(2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gilligan

(1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of the self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481–517.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.

10.

Guardian The, (2004). University Guide 2004. London: Retrieved on 2 August 2004 from http://education.guardian.co.uk/guides.

11.

Halpern

D. F.

(2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th edition). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

12.

Lehmann

D. R.

Lempert

R. O.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. American Psychologist, 43, 431–442.

13.

Lehmann

D. R.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1990). A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 26, 6, 952–960.

14.

O'Hare

McGuinness

(2004, April). The good the bad and the ugly of critical thinking measurement in higher education. Paper delivered at Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.

15.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2002). Honours degree benchmark statements. London: Retrieved September 25, 2003 from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/crntwork/benchmark/honours.html.

16.

Reber

A. S.

(1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

US Department of Education, National Centre of Education Statistics (2000). The NPEC sourcebook on assessment, Volume 1: Definitions and assessment methods for critical thinking, problem solving and writing, (NCES 2000–172), prepared by T. Dary Erwin for the Council of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Student Outcomes Pilot Working Group: Cognitive and Intellectual Development. Washington, D.C. US: Government Printing Office.