This article puts forward a case for all who are involved in teaching psychology in higher education to reflect on and improve their teaching by engaging in action research. Drawing on her own experiences as a psychology lecturer, the author shows how the process works by using an example of a research study on the effects of written feedback to help students improve their essay writing. The article ends with a consideration of why psychology lecturers are particularly well qualified to undertake pedagogical action research.
References
1.
AdamsD. (2000). Views of academic work. Teacher Development. An international journal of teachers' professional development, 4(1) 65–78.
2.
BarnettR. (2000). Supercomplexity and the Curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3) 255–265.
BucklowC.ClarkP. (2000). The role of the Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in supporting professional development in learning and teaching in higher education. Teacher Development. An international journal of teachers' professional development, 4(1) 7–13.
6.
CarrW.KemmisS. (1986). Becoming critical. Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.
7.
EslandG.M. (1971). Teaching and learning as the organisation of knowledge. In YoungM. F. D. (ed.), Knowledge and control. London: Collier Macmillan.
8.
GadzellaB.M.MastenW.G. (1998). Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two major fields. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(4), 256–261.
9.
GibbsG. (ed) (1994). Improving Student Learning. Theory and Practice. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
10.
HartleyJ.NortonL.S. (submitted). Some preliminaries to action research with mature students. Paper submitted to Psychology Teaching Review.
11.
HigginsR. (2000). “59% - excellent!”: Making sense of Assessment Feedback. Paper given at the first annual conference of the institute for learning and teaching in higher education (iltac 2000), College of Ripon and York St John, 27–29 June
12.
HounsellD. (1987). Essay writing and the quality of feedback. In RichardsonJ.T.E.EysenckM.PiperD. Warren (eds), Student Learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.
13.
KellyG.A. (1955). A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W.W. Norton.
14.
KingP.M.KitchenerK.S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
15.
KolbD.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
16.
LathamA.GilbertJ. (1995). Hierarchical teams: Action research project. In GibbsG. (ed.), Improving Student Learning. Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
17.
LaurillardD. (1993) Rethinking university teaching. A framework for the effective use of technology. London: Routledge.
18.
LawsonT.J. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26(3), 207–209.
19.
LewinK. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–36.
20.
MacdonaldR.B. (1991). Developmental students' processing of teacher feedback in composition instruction, Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8(5), 8.
21.
MartonF.Dall'AlbaG.BeatyE. (1993). Conceptions of Learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.
22.
MartonF.HounsellD.EntwistleN. (eds), (1997). The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
23.
MartonF.SaljoR. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
24.
MartonF.SaljoR. (1997). Approaches to learning. In MartonF.HounsellD.EntwistleN. (eds), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
25.
MerryS.OrsmondP.ReilingK. (1998). Biology students' and tutors' understanding of ‘a good essay.’ In RustC. (ed.), Improving Student Learning. Improving Students as Learners. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
26.
MeyerE. (2001). How do students differ in the way they go about learning? Implications for pedagogical practice. Keynote presentation at Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: A Morning of Action Research, Liverpool Hope, 26 January.
27.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997). Higher Education in the learning society, Report of the National Committee. Norwich: HMSO [The Dearing report].
28.
NortonL.S. (1997). The effects of tutor feedback on student motivation in essay writing. Seminar paper presented at the SEDA Spring Conference on Encouraging Student Motivation. University of Plymouth, 8–10 April. A copy of this paper can be obtained from the author.
29.
NortonL.S.CrowleyC.M. (1995). Can students be helped to learn how to learn? An evaluation of an Approaches to Learning programme for first-year degree students. Higher Education, 29, 307–328.
30.
NortonL.HornR.ThomasS. (1997). Innovatory courses: Matching lecturers' objectives with students' perceptions and academic performance. In RustC.GibbsG. (eds), Improving student learning. Improving student learning through course design. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Part X, 331–343.
31.
NortonL. S.NortonJ.C.W. (2001). The essay feedback checklist: How can it help students improve their academic writing? Paper and workshop given at the First International Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing across Europe (EATAW), Groningen, The Netherlands, 18–20 June. A copy of this paper can be obtained from the author.
32.
NortonL.S.ScantleburyE.DickinsT.E. (1999). Helping undergraduates to become more effective learners: An evaluation of two learning interventions. Innovations in Education and Training International (IETI). 36 (4), 273–284.
33.
PerryW.G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34.
SheehanB.A.WelchA.R. (1996). The Academic Profession in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. In AdamsD. (ed.), Views of academic work. Teacher Development. An international journal of teachers' professional development, 4(1) 65–78.
35.
SmithD.CampbellJ.BrookerR. (1998) Developing students' essay writing skills: Implications of case studies in essay writing of undergraduate students in an education faculty. In RustC. (ed.), Improving Student Learning. Improving Students as Learners. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
36.
SpinelliE. (1989). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage.
37.
WeedonE. (2000). Do you read this the way I read this?British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 185–197.
38.
Zuber-SkerrittO. (1992a). Action research in higher education. Examples and reflections. London: Kogan Page.
39.
Zuber-SkerrittO. (1992b). Professional development in higher education. A theoretical framework for action research. London: Kogan Page.
