This article highlights a rarely utilized but effective technique for identifying intended and unintended consequences of past or current policy or policy change. The author guides the reader through the process of identifying potential participants, contacting participants, developing the policy Delphi instrument, and analyzing the findings by sharing an example of a research study he recently completed. In addition, the author also shares other potential uses of this methodology.
References
1.
BakerP. & MoonN. (2010) Policy Development and Access to Wireless Technologies for People with Disabilities: Results of policy Delphi research, Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 227–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0170-3
2.
BaxterL.R. (1986) A Cross-provincial Study in Canadian Art Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
3.
GierM.C. (2000) Policy Delphi as a Means of Identifying and Using Stakeholder Values in Policy Development and Implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado — Denver Graduate School of Public Affairs.
4.
HilliardM.T. (1986) The Identification of Nursing Ethics Content and Teaching Strategies for Baccalaureate Nursing Curriculum Through Policy Delphi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
5.
LinstoneH.A. (2002) Eight Basic Pitfalls: A checklist, in LinstoneH.A. & TuroffM. (Eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications, pp. 559–571. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html (accessed 21 August 2008).
6.
LinstoneH.A. & TuroffM. (Eds) (1975) The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications. London: Addison-Wesley.
7.
LinstoneH.A. & TuroffM. (2002) Introduction, in LinstoneH.A. & TuroffM. (Eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications, pp. 1–12. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html (accessed 15 December 2011).
8.
ManleyR. & PriceW. (2011) The Operational Infrastructure of Secondary-level CTE: Definition, validation, and application, Journal of Career and Technical Education, 26(1), 20–31.
9.
MilesD.E. (1997) Factors Influencing Curriculum Reform in a Community Technical College System: A Policy Delphi study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
10.
MitroffI. & TuroffM. (2002) Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Delphi, in LinstoneH. & TuroffM. (Eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications, pp. 17–34. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html (accessed 21 August 2008).
11.
MurryJ. (1992) Expectations of Department Chairpersons: A Delphi case study, Journal of Staff, Program & Organization Development, 10, 13–21.
12.
PlinskeK. & PackardW. (2010) Trustees' Perceptions of the Desired Qualifications for the Next Generation of Community College Presidents, Community College Review, 37, 291–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0091552109356980
ScrivenM. (1991) Evaluation Thesaurus, 4th edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
TapioP. (2002) Disaggregative Policy Delphi: Using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70, 83–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00177-9
16.
TuroffM. (2002) The Policy Delphi, in LinstoneH. & TuroffM. (Eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications, pp. 80–96. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html (accessed 15 December 2011).
17.
US Congress (1990) Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
18.
VedungE. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
19.
WaltonB.F. (1978) Policy Delphi: Issues in school to work transition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
20.
WeaverT. (1972) Delphi: A critical review. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Education Policy Research Center.
