Between 1990 and 2010, the New Zealand university adopted an enterprise form. The nature of academic work changed commensurate with changes in the external regulatory and funding environment, the internal performative research culture, the proliferation of trans-national researcher networks, and the growing managerial codification of acceptable academic behaviour. Based on emergent trends in these areas between 1990 and 2010, and using the author's institution as an illustrative case, the article looks forward to the possible relationships between academic freedom and research ethics in the New Zealand enterprise university of 2030.
BostonJ.MartinJ.PallotJ. & WalshP. (1996) Public Management: The New Zealand model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
3.
BourdieuP. (1972) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. NiceR.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CoddJ. (2006) The Performance-Based Research Fund and the Production and Commodification of Knowledge, in BakkerL.BostonJ.CampbellL. & SmuthR. (Eds) Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund: Framing the debate. Wellington, NZ: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
5.
DavisM. (1999) Ethics and the University. London: Routledge.
6.
GraceG. (1995) School Leadership: Beyond education management. An Essay in Policy Scholarship. London: Routledge.
7.
Health Research Council (2002/2006) HRC Guidelines on Ethics in Health Research. Wellington, NZ: Health Research Council.
8.
JessonB. (1997) Foreword: The role of the intellectual is to defend the role of the intellectual, in PetersM. (Ed.) Cultural Politics and the University in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979/1984) The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
11.
MartinsonB.CrainA.de VriesR. & AndersonM. (2010) The Importance of Organizational Justice in Ensuring Research Integrity, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67
Ministry of Health (2012) Summary of Submissions on the Draft Standard Operating Procedures for Health and Disability Ethics Committees, and the Draft HDEC Application Form. May. http://www.ethics.health.govt.nz
15.
New Zealand Parliament (1989) Education Act 1989 No 80.
O'NeillO. (2002) A Question of Trust, BBC Reith Lecture 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
PowerM. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
RobertsP. (1999) The Future of the University: Reflections from New Zealand, International Review of Education, 45(1), 65–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003525921200
25.
SavageD. (2000) Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy in New Zealand Universities, in CrozierR. (Ed.) Troubled Times: Academic freedom in New Zealand. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
26.
SlaughterS. & RhoadesG. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
SnookI. (2003) Are Ethics Committees Ethical? Paper presented to the annual conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Christchurch, December.
28.
TollichM. (2001) Beyond an Unfortunate Experiment: Ethics for small-town New Zealand, in TollichM. (Ed.) Research Ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand: Concepts, practice, critique. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education.
