This article begins by examining the dimensions of open science including the ethics of science and the peer review system before defining open science in terms of ‘wiki science’ or ‘science 2.0’. The article then briefly scrutinizes the future of open science, commenting upon the nature of open distributed knowledge systems and new models of production and innovation based on peer-to-peer systems.
BesleyA.C. (Ed.) (2009) Assessing the Quality of Educational Research in Higher Education: International perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense.
3.
DavidPaul A. (2003) The Economic Logic of ‘Open Science’ and the Balance between Private Property Rights and the Public Domain in Scientific Data and Information: A primer. SIEPR Discussion Paper no. 02-30.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
6.
HeelanP. (1991) Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Science, in SilvermanHugh (Ed.) Gadamer and Hermeneutics: Science, culture, and literature, 213–228. New York: Routledge.
7.
HollingsworthJ. RogersMüllerKarl H.HollingsworthEllen Jane (2008) End of Science Superpowers?Nature, 454, 412–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/454412a
LeighJasonBrownMaxine (2008) Cyber-commons: Merging real and virtual worlds, Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 50th anniversary issue: 1958–2008.
10.
LeighJasonBrownMaxineJohnsonAndrew (2008) Global Cyber-commons: Collaborative, instructional environments for the Virtual School of Computational Science and Engineering. White Paper for the Virtual School of Computational Science & Engineering Planning Meeting, organized by the Great Lakes Consortium for Petascale Computation, 1–2 July, University of Michigan. http://www.evl.uic.edu/files/pdf/EVL-VirtualSchool-max-062708.pdf
11.
NikamKhaiserBabuRajendra H. (2009) Moving from Script to Science 2.0 for Scholarly Communication, Webology, 6(1), Article 68. http://www.webology.ir/2009/v6n1/a68.html
12.
OlsonGary M.ZimmermanAnneBosNathan (2008) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. New Haven: MIT Press.
13.
PeltonenMarkku (1996) Introduction, in PeltonenMarkku (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
PetersM.A. (2006) The Rise of Global Science and the Emerging Political Economy of International Research Collaborations, European Journal of Education, 41(2), 225–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00257.x
15.
PetersM.A. (2008) Opening the Book: (from the closed to the open text), International Journal of the Book, 5(1), 11–24. http://ijb.cgpublisher.com/
16.
PetersM.A. (2009a) The Changing Architecture of Global Science. Policy Brief and Occasional Paper (long version), Center for Global Studies, University of Illinois. http://www.cgs.uiuc.edu
17.
PetersM.A. (2009b) Knowledge Economy and Scientific Communication: Emerging paradigms of ‘open knowledge production’ and ‘open education’, in SimonsMaartenOlssenMarkPetersMichael A. (Eds) Re-reading Education Policies: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century, 311–336. Rotterdam: Sense.
18.
PetersM.A. (2009c) Degrees of Freedom and the Virtues of Openness: The internet, the academy and digital rights, in SatterthwaiteJeromePiperHeatherSykesPat (Eds) Power in the Academy, 79–96. Stoke on Trent & Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.
19.
PetersM.A. (2009d) On the Philosophy of Open Science, International Journal of Science in Society, 1(1), 1–27.
20.
PetersM.A.BesleyTina (A.C.) (2006) Building Knowledge Cultures: Education and development in the age of knowledge capitalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
PetersM.A.RobertsP. (2010) The Virtues of Openness. Boulder: Paradigm.
SagotskyJonathan A.Le ZhangWangZhihuiMartinSeanDeisboecThomas S. (2008) Life Sciences and the Web: A new era for collaboration, Molecular Systems Biology, 4, 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.39
27.
SchuchardtK.L.BlackG.D.ChaseJ.M.ElsethagenT.O.SunL. (2007) Process Integration, Data Management, and Visualization Framework for Subsurface Sciences, Journal of Physics: Conference series78(012064), 1–5.
28.
SettleTomJavieI.C.AgassiJoseph (1967) Towards a Theory of Openness to Criticism, in CohenR.S.WartofskyM.W. (Eds) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, 293–323. New York: Humanities Press.
ToulminS. (1972) Human Understanding, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
ToulminS. (1982) The Construal of Reality: Criticism in modern and postmodern science, Critical Inquiry, 9, 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/448190
33.
ToulminS. (2002) The Hermeneutics of the Natural Sciences, in BabichB. (Ed.) Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science, Van Gogh's Eyes, and God: Essays in honor of Patrick A. Heelan, 25–30. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34.
UmplebyS. (1991) Strategies for Winning Acceptance of Second Order Cybernetics. International Symposium on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, 12–18 August, in Baden-Baden, Germany. http://www.gwu.edu/∼umpleby/Strategies_2nd_Cyb.txt
UmplebyS. (2009) Correspondence Principle. International Leadership Forum, conducted by the Western Behavioral Sciences Institute.
37.
Von HippelE.Von KroghG. (2003) Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for organization science, Organization Science, 14(2), 208–223.
