Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Foucault's concept of governmentality frames a critical discourse analysis of Grade Level of Achievement (GLA) Reporting in Alberta. GLA requires teachers to report to the provincial government a whole number that represents their judgment of each student's achievement in meeting the mandated curricular outcomes in grades 1 to 9 language arts and mathematics. Foucault's notion of governmentality guides the analysis as results are illuminated within three prominent themes: homogeneous, efficient effects of power; visibility; and identity. GLA is of interest and import due to the scope of the project, the unique requirements, not solely test-based, and the myriad of ways the data gathered could be used to influence future directions. GLA is significant, micropolitically, in the way it distributes power by involving the subjects directly. The results of this analysis will serve to provide teachers, administrators and policy makers with a way to reconsider their professional agency and identity within a culture of accountability.

References

Alberta Education (2005) Business Plan 2005–2008. http://education.alberta.ca/media/589304/bp2005-08.pdf (accessed May 2008).

Alberta Education (2006a) Grade Level of Achievement Reporting: Teacher and administrator handbook. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education.

Alberta Education (2006b) Business Plan 2006–2009. http://education.alberta.ca/media/589281/bp2006-09.pdf (accessed May 2008).

Alberta Education (2006c) Grade Level of Achievement Reporting Questions & Answers. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education.

Alberta Education (2007) Grade Level of Achievement Pilot Data Report. education.alberta.ca/media/770300/gla_2006_07_pilot_data%20report.pdf (accessed September 2008).

Alberta Teachers' Association (2006a) Revised GLA Reporting Plan Fails to Responds to Teachers' Concerns, ATA News, 41(6).

Alberta Teachers' Association (2006b) The Gathering Storm: The winds of grade level of achievement and computer adaptive assessment threaten Alberta classrooms, ATA News, 40(5).

Ball

(1987) The Micro-politics of the School, 1–27. London: Methuen.

Bushnell

(2003) Teachers in the Schoolhouse Panopticon: Complicity and resistance, Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124503035003001

10.

Department of Education (2008) Indicators to Track Nation's Education Progress. Washington, DC: ED.gov. http://www.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/results/trends/indicators.html (accessed September 2008).

11.

Ericson

Haggerty

K.D.

(1997) Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

12.

Foucault

(1975) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison (Trans. Sheridan

). New York: Vintage Books.

13.

Foucault

(1980) Prison Talks, in Gordon

(Ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michel Foucault, 1972–1977 (Trans. Gordon

), 109–133. New York: Pantheon.

14.

Government of Alberta (2007) Alberta Economic Quick Facts. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Finance and Enterprise. http://www.albertacanada.com/documents/SP-EH_factsonalberta_2007.pdf (accessed September 2008).

15.

Government of Alberta (2008) Higher Surplus to Boost Savings and Address Climate Change. Edmonton, AB. News release. http://www.alberta.ca/home/NewsFrame.cfm?ReleaseID=/acn/200808/24215000398E2-98DE-6DA2-DEED37D938CD99CD.html (accessed September 2008).

16.

Graham

Wood

(2003) Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality, Critical Social Policy, 23(3), 235–257.

17.

Iannaccone

(1991) Micropolitics in Education: What and why, Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 465–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124591023004008

18.

Jardine

(2005) Foucault and Education, 23–55. New York: Peter Lang.

19.

Larrinaga

Macías

(2005) Technologies of Power and Accountability in Sixteenth-Century Spain: Castillo's treatise on accounts revisited. http://www.muprivate.edu.au/fileadmin/SOE/Accounting_History/Larrinaga__Macias.pdf (accessed December 2006).

20.

Lemke

(2001) ‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality, Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.

21.

Mawhinney

(1999) Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micro-politics of leadership in reforming schools, School Leadership and Management, 19(2), 159–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632439969168

22.

Perry

(2006) Risk, Error and Accountability: Improving the practice of school leaders, Educational Research Policy and Practice, 5, 149–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10671-006-9002-x

23.

Ranson

(2003) Public Accountability in the Age of Neo-liberal Governance, Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000124848

24.

Simons

Masschelein

(2006) The Learning Society and Governmentality: An introduction, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00202.x

25.

Smits

(2003) Trying to Teach, Trying to Learn: Listening to students. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Teachers' Association.

26.

Strathern

(2000) The Tyranny of Transparency, British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.

27.

Taylor

(2001) The Politics of Educational Reform in Alberta. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

28.

Ungerleider

(2003) Failing our Kids. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.

29.

Van Manen

(1991) The Tact of Teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. London, ON: The Althouse Press.

Teaching in Full View: GLA as a Mechanism of Power

Abstract

References