Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2004-9
Undermining Democratic Education in the USA: The Consequences of Global Capitalism and Neo-Liberal Policies for Education Policies at the Local,State and Federal Levels
In the USA, many of the recent education reforms have been implemented in response to calls from neo-liberal and conservative policy makers to improve education efficiency and reduce public expenditures within an increasingly globalized economy. Consequently, local, state, and federal education policies increasingly employ curricular standards and high-stakes testing as a means of introducing competition and markets into education. Moreover, for some policy makers such reforms are the first step towards privatizing education through charter schools and vouchers programs. In this article the author analyzes the consequences such policies have had on the education system on three scales: the city of Chicago, the state of New York, and the US federal government. In particular, the reforms have shifted the control over education from the local to the state and federal levels. Further, the reforms have increased inequality between the advantaged middle-class and White students and the disadvantaged working-class students and students of color.
References
1.
AmreinA.L. & BerlinerD.C. (2002) High Stakes Testing, Uncertainty, and Student Learning, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
2.
AppleM.W. (1996) Cultural Politics and Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3.
AppleM.W. (2003) State and the Politics of Knowledge. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
4.
AppleM.W. & BeaneJ.A. (1995) Democratic Schools. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5.
ArensonK. (2003) New York Math Exam Trials Showed Most Students Failing, New York Times, 27 August, C-12.
6.
BallS. (1994) Education Reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. New York: The New Press.
8.
BraceyG. (2004) The 14th Bracey Report on the Condition of Public Education, Phi Delta Kappan, 86, pp. 149–167.
9.
CalaW. (2002, September 24) [Letter to the editor], Education Week.
10.
CallahanR. (1962) Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CastellsM. (1989) The Informational City. London: Blackwell.
13.
CastellsM. (1998) End of the Millennium. London: Blackwell.
14.
DaleR. (1989) The State and Education Policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
15.
DarderA. (2001) Rewriting Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of love. Boulder: Westview Press.
16.
DeanM. (2002) Liberal Government and Authoritarianism, Economy and Society, 31(1), pp. 37–61.
17.
EbelingR. (2000) It's Time to Put Public Education behind Us, The Future of Freedom Foundation Commentaries. Available at: www.fff.org/comment/ed0200f.asp
18.
FoucaultM. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
19.
FriedmanM. (1995) Public Schools: Make them private, Washington Post, 19 February. Cato Institute Briefing Paper No. 23, 23 June. Available at: www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-023.html
20.
HaneyW. (2000) The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
21.
HaneyW. (2003) Attrition of Students from New York Schools, invited testimony at public hearing ‘Regents Learning Standards and High School Graduation Requirements’ before the New York Senate Standing Committee on Education, Senate Hearing Room, New York, 23 September. Available at: http://www.timeoutfromtesting.org/testimonies/923_Testimony_Haney.pdf
22.
HarveyD. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HaydenC. (2001) Letter to the Hon. Richard Brodsky and the Hon. Richard Green, New York State Assembly, 7 May.
24.
HurshD. (1988) Becoming Teachers: Pre-service teachers' understanding of school and society, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
25.
HurshD. (2003) Discourse, Power and Resistance in New York: The rise of testing and accountability and the decline of teacher professionalism and local control, in SatterthwaiteJ.AtkinsonE. & GaleK. (Eds) Discourse, Power and Resistance: Challenging the rhetoric of contemporary education, pp. 43–56. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
26.
HurshD. (2004) The Rise of High Stakes Testing, Accountability and Education Markets and the Decline in Educational Equality, manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
HurshD. & AppleM. (1983) The Fiscal Crisis, Politics and Education: A critical analysis of the report of the National Commission of Excellence in Education, unpublished manuscript.
28.
HurshD. & MartinaC.A. (2003) Neoliberalism and Schooling in the US: How state and federal government education policies perpetuate inequality, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(2). Available at: http://www.jceps.com
29.
JohnsonD.C. & SalleL.M. (2004) Responding to the Attack on Public Education and Teacher Unions. London: Commonwealth Institute. Available at: www.commonwealinstitute.org
30.
KleinfieldN. (2002) ‘The Elderly Man and the Sea?’Test Sanitizes Literacy Texts, New York Times, June 2, p. 1.
31.
LemkeT. (2002) Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique, Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), pp. 49–64.
32.
LipmanP. (2004) High Stakes Education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
33.
McNeilL. (2000) Contradictions of School Reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
34.
McNeilL. & ValenzeulaA. (2001) The Harmful Impact of the TAAS System of Testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric, in OrfieldG. & KornhaberM.L. (Eds) Raising Standards or Raising Barriers? Inequality and High Stakes Testing in Public Education, pp. 127–150. New York: Century Foundation Press.
35.
MartinaC.HurshD.MarkowitzD.HartK. & DebesP. (2003) Contradictions in Educational Policy: Developing integrated problem-based curriculum in a high stakes environment, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Studies Association, Mexico City, October 30-November 2.
36.
MinerB. (1999/2000) Testing: Full speed ahead. A Report on the National Education Summit, Rethinking Schools, 15(2), pp. 8–10.
37.
MinerB. (2004) Seed Money for Conservatives, Rethinking Schools, 18(4), pp. 9–11.
38.
MonkD.SippleJ. & KilleenK. (2001) Adoption and Adaptation: New York State School Districts' Responses to State Imposed High School Graduation Requirements: An eight-year retrospective, a condition study prepared for the New York State Education Finance Research Consortium, 10 September. Available at: http://www.albany.edu/edfin/CR01_MSK_Report.pdf
39.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
40.
New York State School Boards Association (16 September 2002) Title I Accountability Status, updated for 10 March 2003.
41.
No Child Left Behind Act (2001) 20 USC, para. 6301.
42.
OrfieldG.LosenD.WaldJ. & SwansonC. (2004) Losing Our Future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Contributors: Advocates for Children of New York, The Civil Society Institute. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
US Department of Education (April 2002) What to Know and Where to Go: A parents' guide to No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of the Secretary.
53.
US Department of Education (September 2002) No Child Left Behind: A desk reference. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.
54.
WineripM. (2003a) Passing Grade Defies Laws of Physics, New York Times, 12 March, A-22 & B-7.
55.
WineripM. (2003b) The ‘Zero Dropout’ Miracle: Alas! alack! A Texas Tall Tale, New York Times, 13 August, B-7.
56.
WineripM. (2003c) 2 English Tests Speak Different Tongues, New York Times, 17 September, A-23.
57.
WinterG. (2004) Worst Rates of Graduation are in New York, New York Times, 26 February, B3.
