Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2003-6
Fostering a Global Imaginary: The Possibilities and Paradoxes of Japanese and Canadian Students’ Perceptions of the Responsibilities of World Citizenship
This article presents the results of a pilot study comparing how high-school students in Canada and Japan (n=194) understand and imagine the responsibilities of ‘world citizenship.’ Analysis of the results of our study indicate that despite similarities in perceptions between students in the two nations, significant differences exist in how Japanese and Canadian students construct a global imaginary of citizenship – particularly in terms of the extent to which students have a hopeful attitude towards the future and view themselves as active participants in the resolution of global issues. These results suggest that educational policy makers in Canada and Japan currently involved in curriculum reform that emphasizes internationalization and intercultural dialogue, must be mindful of the possibilities and paradoxes inherent in attempts to foster a global imaginary of citizenship among their students.
References
1.
AikenheadG. (1985) Science Curricula and Preparation for Social Responsibility, in BybeeR. W. (Ed.) Science, Technology, Society: 1985 yearbook of the National Science Teachers Association. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
2.
AikenheadG. (1994) What is STS Science Teaching?, in SolomonJ.AikenheadG. (Eds) Sts Education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
AndersonB. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
4.
AppleM. (1998) The Curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
BarberB. R. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory democracy for a new age. Berkley: University of California.
6.
BarrR. D.BarthJ. L.ShermisS.S. (1977) Defining the Social Studies. National Council for the Social Studies, Bulletin 51. Arlington: National Council for the Social Studies.
7.
BenczeL. (2000) Empowering Constructivist School Science: Promoting self- and democracy, in HodsonD. (Ed.) OISE Papers in Education. Toronto: OISE.
8.
BladesD. (1997) Procedures of Power & Curriculum Change: Foucault and the quest for change in science education. New York: Peter Lang.
9.
BybeeR. W. (1987) Science Education and the Science-Technology-Society (S-T-S) Theme, Science Education, 71(5), pp. 667–683.
10.
BybeeR. W.MauT. (1986) Science and Technology-related Global Problems: An international survey of science educators, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, pp. 599–618.
11.
ChatterjeeP. (1993) The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
CherryholmesC. H. (1980) Social Knowledge and Citizenship Education: Two views of truth and criticism, Curriculum Inquiry, 10, pp. 115–141.
13.
CoganJ. J. (1998) The Challenge of Multidimensional Citizenship for the 21st Century, in CoganJ. J.DerricotR. (Eds) Citizenship for the 21st Century: An international perspective on education. London: Kogan Page.
14.
deBoerG. E. (1991) A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
DuschlR. A. (1988) Abandoning the Scientistic Legacy of Science Education, Science Education, 72, pp. 51–62.
16.
FeinburgW. (1998) Common Schools/Uncommon Identities: National identity and cultural difference. New Haven: Yale University Press.
17.
FenshamP. J. (1993) Academic Influence on School Science Curricula, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, pp. 53–64.
18.
GellnerE. (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Government of Alberta (1995) Biology 20–30 Program of Studies. Edmonton: Alberta Learning.
20.
Government of Alberta (2000) Social Studies 10-20-30 Program of Studies. Edmonton: Alberta Learning.
21.
Government of Alberta (2002) Social Studies 10-20-30 Program of Studies. Edmonton: Alberta Learning.
HodsonD. (1998) Teaching and Learning Science: Towards a personalized approach. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
30.
HurdP. D. (1989) Problems and Issues in Science-curriculum Reform and Implementation, in Committee on High-school Biology Education (Eds) High-school Biology: Today and tomorrow. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
31.
International Center for the Advancement of Scientific Literacy (1993) A Statement of Purpose and Program. Chicago: Chicago Academy of Sciences.
32.
JenkinsF. (1990) STS Science Education: Unifying the goals of science education. Edmonton: Curriculum Support Branch, Alberta Education.
KingwellM. (2000) The World We Want: Virtue, vice and the good citizen. Toronto: Viking.
35.
KubowP.GrossmanD.NinomiyaA. (1998) Multidimensional Citizenship: Educational policy for the 21st century, in CoganJ. J.DerricotR. (Eds) Citizenship for the 21st Century: An international perspective on education. London: Kogan Page.
36.
KumanoY. (2000) The Effects of STS Instruction in Japan Compared to Results Reported in the US. Tokyo: Asusa Shuppan Sha.
37.
KymlickaW. (2001) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. London: Oxford University Press.
38.
MerryfieldM. (2001) Moving the Center of Global Education: From imperial worldviews that divide the world to double consciousness, contrapuntal pedagogy, hybridity, and cross-cultural competence, in ParkerW. C. (Ed.) Critical Issues in Social Studies Education for the 21st Century. Greenwich: Information Age Publishers.
39.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
40.
NorrisS. P. (1997) Intellectual Independence for Nonscientists, and Other Content-transcendent Goals of Science Education, Science Education, 81, pp. 239–258.
41.
NussbaumM. C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
PikeG.SelbyD. (1995) Reconnecting from National to Global Curriculum. Toronto: International Institute for Global Education, University of Toronto.
44.
RamseyJ. (1993) The Science Education Reform Movement: Implications for social responsibility, Science Education, 77, pp. 235–258.
45.
ReisnerE. (1925) Nationalism and Education Since 1789: A social and political history of modern education. New York: Macmillan.
46.
RichardsonG. H. (2002) The Death of the Good Canadian: Teachers, national identities and the social studies curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
47.
RichardsonG. H.BladesD. (2001a) Just Following Orders: The paralysis of teacher agency amidst the corporatization of freedom. Paper presented to The 2nd Annual Curriculum and Pedagogy Conference, University of Victoria, October.
48.
RichardsonG. H.BladesD. (2001b) Social Studies and Science Education: Developing world citizenship through interdisciplinary partnerships, Canadian Social Studies, 35(3), p. 10. Also available on-line at: http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/css
49.
RichardsonG. H.CoutureJ. C. (2000) Citizenship Education: Not the what, but the who. Paper presented to the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. University of Alberta, 28 May.
50.
SearsA.HughesA. (1996) Citizenship Education and Current Educational Reform, Canadian Journal of Education, 21, pp. 123–142.
51.
SearsA.WrightI. (Eds) (1997) Trends and Issues in Canadian Social Studies. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
52.
SmithA. (1998) Nationalism and Modernism: A critical review of recent theories of nations and nationalism. London: Routledge.
53.
SmithD. G. (1999) Globalization and Education: Prospects for postcolonial pedagogy in a hermeneutic mode, Interchange, 30, pp. 1–9.
54.
Torney-PurtaJ.SchwillerJ.AmadeoJ. A. (Eds) (1999) Civic Education Across Countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA Civic Education Project. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
