The discourse of the non-traditional classroom has found itself fundamentally intertwined with the rationalities of creating learning relevant for the future-orientated twenty-first century. In such an imaginary the idea of the conventional classroom – with its four walls, blackboard, ‘closed’ door, teacher-centred pedagogy and student learning conceptualised through the logics of the industrial era – is being renegotiated. This article focuses on an empirical examination of some of the changes to student classroom practice enabled by the material conditions of non-traditional learning spaces. In particular, it highlights the ways in which non-traditional learning spaces have become complex settings through which students negotiate increased learner autonomy, co-operative learning, acceptable classroom behaviour and fluid relations with teachers and peers. The article presents a discussion of the discourse of ‘twenty-first-century learning’ and focuses on non-traditional classrooms as an example of a localised expression of this discourse, supported by ethnographic data generated from field visits to three primary schools in Sydney, Australia to explore student practices enabled by such spaces.
References
1.
ArmstrongF. (2007) Disability, Education, and Space: Some critical reflections, in GulsonK.SymesC. (Eds) Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and geography matters, pp. 95–110. New York: Routledge.
2.
BiestaG. (2011) From Learning Cultures to Educational Cultures: Values and judgements in educational research and educational improvement, International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 199–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13158-011-0042-x.
BoylanC.WallaceA. (2009) Engaging with ‘Learnscapes’: Connecting community and school, Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38, 94–102.
5.
BradleyD. (2004) Dimensions Vary: Technology, space and power in the 20th century office, Topia: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 11 (Spring), 67–82.
FurmanG.C.GruenewaldD.A. (2004) Expanding the Landscape of Social Justice: A critical ecological analysis, Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1) (February), 47–76.
17.
GarbuttM.SchlatterJ. (2010) Look Inside Our Space!Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 16(1), 12–16.
HineT. (2000) Office Intrigues: The interior life of corporate culture, in AlbrechtD.BroikosC. (Eds), On the Job: Design and the American office, pp.128–143. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
20.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2000) Lifelong Learning in the Twenty-first Century: The changing roles of educational personnel. Report prepared for discussion at the Joint Meeting on Lifelong Learning in the Twenty-First Century. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
McCarthyC.PittonV.KimS.MonjeD. (2009) Movement and Stasis in the Neoliberal Reorientation of Schooling, in AppleM.W.AuW.GandinL.A. (Eds) Routledge International Handbook of Critical Education, pp. 36–50. New York: Routledge.
27.
McGregorJ. (2004) Spatiality and the Place of the Material in Schools, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(3), 347–372.
OblingerD. (2005) Leading the Transition from Classrooms to Learning Spaces, Educause Quarterly, 1, 14–18.
30.
PearlmanB. (2010) Designing New Learning Environments to Support 21st Century Skills, in BellancaJ.BrandtR. (Eds) 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how students learn, pp. 117–147. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
31.
SaltmarshS.ChapmanA.CampbellM.DrewC. (2014, in review) Putting ‘Structure within the Space’: Spatially un/responsive pedagogies in open-plan learning environments, Educational Review.
32.
SojaE.W. (1989) Postmodern Geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.
StephensW.CostaE. (2007) Common Ground, Teacher, February, 44–48.
35.
ThriftN. (2003) Space: The fundamental stuff of human geography, in HollowayS.RiceS.ValentineG. (Eds) Key Concepts in Geography, pp. 95–107. London: Sage.
