Bruce and Bishop's community informatics work brings forward four critical concepts: inquiry, community, technology, and literacy. These four terms serve as the basis for a discussion of qualitative research in the twenty-first century — what is lacking and what is needed. The author suggests that to resolve the tensions or challenges qualitative research currently faces, a fifth term is needed — aesthetics. These five terms are then used to describe a repositioned field of qualitative research.
BreslerL. (2006b) Toward Connectedness: Aesthetically based research, Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 52–69.
4.
BruceB. & BishopA. (2008) New Literacies and Community Inquiry, in CoiroJ.KnobelM.LankshearC. & LeuD. (Eds) Handbook of Research on New Literacies, pp. 699–742. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
5.
DavidsonJ. (2000) Living Reading: Exploring the lives of reading teachers. New York: Peter Lang.
6.
DavidsonJ. & diGregorioS. (2010) Qualitative Research and Technology: In the midst of a revolution, in DenzinN. & LincolnY. (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DiGregorioS. & DavidsonJ. (2008) Qualitative Research Design for Software Users. New York: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
StarS. & GriesemerJ. (1989) Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and professionals in Bereley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001