Responsive evaluation builds upon the methods of informal evaluation in disciplined ways: getting personally acquainted with the evaluand, observation of activities, interviewing people who are in different ways familiar with the evaluand, searching documents that reveal what happened in the past or somewhere else. It calls for sustained effort to know quality and insufficiency, by different definitions.
MejíaA. (2010) The General in the Particular, Journal of Philosophy in Education, 44(1), 99–107.
9.
MonnierE. (2007) Un sistema pluralista y participativo: Coproducir la evaluatión con la sociedad civil. Paper presented at Instituto Madrileño de Administration Pública, April 26, in Madrid.
10.
PattonM. (2010) Developmental Evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
11.
PolanyiM. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. New York: Double Day.
12.
ScrivenM. (1967) The Methodology of Evaluation, in StakeR. (Ed.) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
13.
SimonsH. (1987) Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy: The politics and process of evaluation. Lewes: Falmer.
14.
StakeR. (1967) The Countenance of Evaluation, Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540.
15.
StakeR. (1974) Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation, New Trends in Evaluation. Report No. 35, pp. 1–20. Gothenburg: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.
16.
StakeR. (2004) Standards-based and Responsive Evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
