This article presents the results of a mixed-methods study of the Adult Literacy Education Wiki. Two research questions framed the study: (1) What do participants report they have learned by contributing to the wiki? and (2) What is the nature of participation and collaboration in the wiki? A key finding of the study is that the wiki does not achieve the levels of participation and collaboration that its founders hope for, and that contributors' own perspectives on literacy may be a contributing factor. The article includes suggestions for ways wiki organizers can address the issue of limited participation.
References
1.
BelzerA. (1998) The Pennsylvania Adult Literacy Practitioner Inquiry Network. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 427 222.
2.
ComingsJ.P.ParrellaA.SoriconeL. (1999) Persistence among Adult Basic Education Students in Pre-GED Classes. Report No. 12. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
EliaA, (2006) An Analysis of Wikipedia Digital Writing. Proceedings of the workshop on New Text: Wikis and blogs and other dynamic text sources, 16–23. 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www6.ufrgs.br/limc/escritacoletiva/pdf/writing.pdf
HeathS.B. (1983) Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
JacobsonE. (2008) The Adult Literacy Education Wiki as a Virtual Community of Practice, in HildrethP.KimbleC. (Eds) Communities of Practice: Creating learning environments for educators, 325–343. Charlotte: Information Age.
10.
JoyceB.ShowersB. (2002) Student Achievement through Staff Development, 3rd edn.Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
KutnerM.ShermanR.TibbettsJ.CondelliL. (1997) Evaluating Professional Development: A framework for adult education. Washington, DC: Pelavin Research Associates.
12.
LankshearC.KnobelM. (2006) New Literacies: Everyday practices and classroom literacies, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
LeonardL.LeonardP. (2003) The Continuing Trouble with Collaboration: Teachers talk, Current Issues in Education, 6(15). http://cie.asu.edu/volume6/number15/
14.
LesserE.FontaineM. (2004) Overcoming Knowledge Barriers with Communities of Practice: Lessons learned through practical experience, in HildrethP.KimbleC. (Eds) Knowledge Networks: Innovation through communities of practice, 14–23. Hershey: Idea Group.
SengeP. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
17.
SmithC.BingmanM.B.HoferJ.MedinaP. (2002) Connecting Practitioners and Researchers: An evaluation of NCSALL's Practitioner Dissemination and Research Network. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 469 857.
18.
SmithC.HoferJ.GillespieM. (2001) The Working Conditions of the Adult Literacy Teachers: Preliminary findings from the NCSALL Staff Development Study, Focus on Basics, 4, D, 1–7.
19.
United States Department of Education (2007) Adult Education Annual Report to Congress, 2004–05. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
