This article draws on constructs in second-language acquisition, literacy, cultural, and media studies as theoretical bases for examining how networked technologies and fan culture provide a young English language learner (ELL) with a site for developing her English language and writing skills. During this process, she also develops an online identity as a popular, multiliterate writer. To understand how this happens, the notion of identity is explored as a fluid construct that shifts over time with this ELL's long-term participation in a fan community. Popular and fan culture are also examined as points of affiliation and as dialogic resources that she appropriates, both in her writing and in her interactions with other fans. In so doing, the article demonstrates how popular culture and technology converge to provide a context in which this adolescent ELL is able to develop a powerful, transcultural identity, discursively constructed through the different cultural perspectives and literacies that she and other fans from across the globe bring to this space.
References
1.
AtkinsonD.R.MortenG.SueD.W. (1983) Counseling American Minorities: A cross-cultural perspective. Dubuque: William C. Brown.
2.
BakhtinM.M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Ed. HolquistM., Trans. HolquistM.EmersonC., Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BlackR.W. (2005) Access and Affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language learners in an online fanfiction community, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(2), pp. 118–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.2.4
4.
BlackR.W. (forthcoming) Digital Design: English language learners and reader feedback in online fanfiction, in KnobelM.LankshearC. (Eds) A New Literacies Sampler. New York: Peter Lang.
5.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2000) Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, pp. 69–91. London: Routledge.
6.
DysonA. (1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
GayG. (1985) Implications of the Selected Models of Ethnic Identity Development for Educators, Journal of Negro Education, 54, pp. 43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2294899
9.
GeeJ.P. (1986) Units in the Production of Narrative Discourse, Discourse Processes, 9, pp. 391–422.
10.
GeeJ.P. (1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
11.
GeeJ.P. (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
12.
GeeJ.P. (2001) Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education, in SecadaW.G. (Ed.) Review of Research in Education, vol. 25, pp. 99–126. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13.
GeeJ.P. (2004) Situated Language and Learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
GoldenA. (1997) Memoirs of a Geisha. New York: Random House.
16.
HallidayM.A.K.MatthiessenC.M.I.M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd revised edn.London: Hodder Arnold.
17.
HarklauL. (forthcoming) The Adolescent English Language Learner: Identities lost and found, in CumminsJ.DavisonC. (Eds) Handbook of English Language Teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18.
ItoM. (forthcoming) Technologies of the Childhood Imagination: Yugioh, media mixes, and everyday cultural production, in KaraganisJ.JeremijenkoN. (Eds) Network/Netplay: Structures of participation in digital culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. http://www.itofisher.com/mito/archives/technoimagination.pdf (accessed 30 May 2006).
19.
JeffresL.W. (1983) Communication, Social Class, and Culture, Communication Research, 10(2), pp. 220–246.
20.
JenkinsH. (1992) Textual Poachers: Television, fans, and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
21.
JonesS., (Ed.) (1997) Virtual Culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22.
LamW.S.E. (2000) Literacy and the Design of the Self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet, TESOL Quarterly, 34, pp. 457–482.
23.
LamW.S.E. (2004) Second Language Socialization in a Bilingual Chat Room: Global and local considerations, Language Learning and Technology, 8(3), pp. 44–65. http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/ (accessed 15 January 2005).
24.
LamW.S.E. (2005) Re-envisioning Language, Literacy, and the Immigrant Subject in New Mediascapes. Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
25.
LankshearC.KnobelM. (2003) New Literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
26.
LemkeJ. (2005) Critical Analysis across Media: Games, franchises, and the new cultural order, in PostigoM. Labarto (Ed.) Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, CD-ROM edn.Valencia: University of Valencia.
MitraA. (1997) Virtual Commonality: Looking for India on the Internet, in JonesS.G. (Ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety, pp. 55–79. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29.
NewkirkT. (2002) Misreading Masculinity: Boys, literacy, and popular culture. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30.
New London Group (1996) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing social futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66, pp. 60–92.
31.
NystrandM. (1997) Dialogic Instruction: When recitation becomes conversation, in NystrandM.GamoranA.KachurR.PrendergastC., Opening Dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
