As awarding bodies modernise their procedures and incorporate elements of e-assessment into their qualifications, e-portfolios are emerging as a popular method of allowing candidates to display their abilities. All major United Kingdom awarding bodies now accept evidence from e-portfolio products for at least some of their qualifications. Although there is a substantial body of emerging literature looking at how e-portfolios can be used and the practical implications of increasing provision, issues of identity and privacy with widespread use of e-portfolio products are rather less well explored. This article highlights the two dominant paradigms of e-portfolios – e-portfolio as assessment and e-portfolio as story – before exploring the concept of identity, particularly in relation to authentication, within an e-portfolio. It also considers the concept of ‘emplotment’ as defined by Ricoeur as a means of making sense of the narrative identity created. The article examines the implications and issues for awarding bodies associated with personal identity, privacy and surveillance which are raised by the widespread use of e-portfolios. It goes on to suggest some areas for further investigation and exploration.
References
1.
BacardA. (1996) The Computers have Eyes: How private is private in the digital age, Playboy Magazine, February.
ClarkeR. (1994a) Human Identification in Information Systems: Management challenges and public policy issues, Information Technology & People, 7(4), pp. 6–37.
8.
ClarkeR. (1994b) The Digital Persona and its Application to Data Surveillence, The Information Society, 10(2).
9.
DearingR. (1997) Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO.
10.
EriksonE.H. (1968) Identity, Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
FoucaultM. (1983) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
13.
GillC. (2003) E-portfolios: Scrutinised and valued. Report for the Learning and Skills Council.
14.
GonsiorekG.C.RudolphJ. (1991) Homosexual Identity: Coming out and other developmental events, in GonsiorekJ.C.WeinrichJ.D. (Eds) Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15.
HallS. (1992) New Ethnicities in Race Culture and Difference. London: Sage.
16.
HarterS. (1999) The Construction of the Self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guildford Press.
17.
Home Office (2004) Keep Your Child Safe on the Internet. London: Home Office Communications Department.
18.
hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to Transgress. New York: Routledge.
JarrettK. (2004) Battlecat Then, Battlecat Now: Temporal shifts, hyperlinking and database subjectivities, in GurakL.AntonijevicS.JohnsonL.RatliffC.ReymanJ. (Eds) Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/battlecat_then_battlecat_now.html
21.
Joint Information Systems Council /British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (JISC/BECTA) (2004) e-Portfolios and e-Assessment: JISC and Becta announce major collaboration. Joint JISC/BECTA press release, 13 December.
22.
LandR.BayneS. (2002) Screen or Monitor? Issues of Surveillance and Disciplinary Power in Online Learning Environments, in RustC. (Ed.) Improving Student Learning Using Learning Technologies. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Learning and Staff Development.
23.
LewisM.Brookes-GunnJ. (1979) Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self. New York: Plenum.
24.
LyonD. (1994) The Electronic Eye: The rise of surveillence society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
McAlpineM. (2004) E-portfolios: An analysis and some suggestions. SQA (Scottish Qualifications Authority) internal report. Dalkeith: SQA.
26.
MossP.A.SutherlandL.M.HanifordL.MillerR.JohnsonD.GeistP.KoziolS.M.StarJ.R.PecheoneR.L. (2004) Interrogating the Generalizability of Portfolio Assessments of Beginning Teachers: A qualitative study, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(32). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n32/
27.
PosterM. (2001) Essays: The information subject. New York: G & B Arts International.
28.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (2002) Memorandum of Understanding between the DfES and the QCA. http://www.qca.org.uk/11978.html
29.
RicoeurP. (1995) Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
RochatP.StrianoT. (2002) Who is in the Mirror? Self and other discrimination in specular images by four and nine month old infants, Child Development, 73(1), pp. 35–46.
31.
RosenbergJ.F. (1986) Self-concept from Middle Childhood through Adolescence, in SulsJ.GreenwaldA.G. (Eds) Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol. 3. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
32.
RushdieS. (1991) One Thousand Days in a Balloon, New York Times, 12 December.
33.
Scotland on Sunday (2002) Paedophile Fears Lead to Nativity Camera Ban, 15 December.
34.
ShulmanL. (1998) Teacher Portfolios: A theoretical activity, in SmithE.GrantP. (2004) From Evidence to e-Moderation – the centre and providers perspectives, paper presented at The Challenge of the Electronic Portfolio Conference, Museum of Science and Industry, Manchester, 21 October.
35.
SmithE.GrantP. (2004) From Evidence to E-moderation – the centre and providers perspectives, paper presented at The Challenge of the Electronic Portfolio Conference, Museum of Science and Industry, Manchester, 21 October.
36.
StefanakisE.H. (2002) Multiple Intelligences and Portfolios. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
37.
StrykerS.BurkeP.J. (2000) The Past, Present and Future of Identity Theory, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, pp. 284–297.
SulerJ. (2004) The Online Disinhibition Effect, Cyber-Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), pp. 321–326.
41.
SulerJ.PhillipsW. (1998) The Bad Boys of Cyberspace: Deviant behaviour in multimedia chat communities, Cyber-Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), pp. 275–294.
42.
TillemaH. (2001) Portfolios as Developmental Assessment Tools, International Journal of Training & Development, 5(2), pp. 126–135.
43.
TomlinsonM. (2002) Inquiry into A Level Standards. London: HMSO.
44.
ToshD.WerdmullerB. (2004a) The Learning Landscape: A conceptual framework for e-portfolios, Interact, 29, pp. 14–15.
